Tesla-Panasonic update

On December 27, 2016, Tesla Motors (TSLA), the popular electric carmaker, announced that it reached an agreement with Panasonic “to begin the manufacturing of photovoltaic (or PV) cells and modules at the Buffalo, NY factory.” Under the deal, Panasonic will invest about $256 million in the Buffalo plant, while Tesla promises to purchase PV cells and modules from the Japanese electronics company for the long term. Now, let’s take a look at how investors reacted to the update.

How Did Investors React to Panasonic’s Investment in Tesla?

Tesla stock surges

On the day of the announcement, Tesla stock rose to a four-month high and closed at $219.53 with 2.9% gains for the session. However, the optimism in Tesla’s stock didn’t last long. Its stock erased the gains in the next two days. As of December 29, 2016, it’s trading at $214.68.

On October 16, 2016, Tesla revealed that it’s in the process of partnering with Panasonic to manufacture PV cells and modules at the plant in Buffalo, New York. Back then, no information was provided on Panasonic’s intention to invest in the Buffalo facility. Panasonic’s decision to invest $256 million in the plant could be the primary reason for the initial optimism among Tesla investors.

YTD performance

As of December 29, 2016, Tesla stock lost about 10.6% on a YTD (year-to-date) basis. Concerns about Tesla’s ability to meet its ambitious 2018 production targets and deliver Model 3 in time could reflect in investors’ cautious approach on its stock.

So far in 4Q16, Tesla recovered ~5.2%. Tesla reported strong growth in its 3Q16 earnings, deliveries, and production rate which could be the key reason for this recovery.

In 2016, General Motors (GM) has gained about 3.3% YTD. Other mainstream automakers (XLY) such as Ford (F) and Fiat Chrysler (FCAU) have witnessed YTD value erosion of about 13.2% and 0.7%, respectively.

In the next part, we’ll look at the key milestones in the Tesla-Panasonic partnership.

Latest articles

Broadcom (AVGO) stock fell ~8.5% after markets closed yesterday following the semiconductor giant's fiscal 2019 second-quarter earnings release. It missed analysts' revenue estimate and cut its fiscal 2019 revenue guidance by $2 billion to $22.5 billion due to sluggishness in its semiconductor solutions business.

The SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD), which tracks physical gold prices, has underperformed the broader markets year-to-date, rising just 4.4% compared to the S&P 500’s (SPY) gain of 15.9% as of June 14. The sentiment for gold, however, has been turning around.

Safe havens such as Treasuries and gold were back in favor on June 14 as stocks fell due to rising tensions in the Middle East, concerns over growth, and the looming threat of the US-China trade war. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index fell 0.67% in the first hour of trading.

Lululemon (LULU) stock rose 2.1% on June 13 in reaction to better-than-expected first-quarter results and an upgraded outlook for fiscal 2019 overall. The company's first-quarter adjusted EPS grew 34.5% to $0.74 on revenue growth of 20.4% to $782.32 million. Analysts had expected EPS of $0.70 and revenue of $755.31 million. Here's why the outlook got an upgrade.

14 Jun

IEA Again Slashes Its Oil Demand Growth Estimate

WRITTEN BY Rabindra Samanta

As of 4:40 AM Eastern Time today, US crude oil active futures were at $51.83, ~4% below their closing level in the previous week. If US crude oil prices stay at those levels today, they'll mark their third week of decline in five weeks.

Amazon is discontinuing its Amazon Restaurants service, which has been delivering food for restaurants in parts of the United States. Amazon Restaurants launched in the United States in 2015 and entered the British market the following year. However, it met strong opposition in the British market.