US crude oil rigs
Baker Hughes (BHI) reported that the weekly US crude oil rig count declined by nine rigs, from 614 to 605, in the week ended October 9. The sustained fall in the past six weeks dealt a blow to the turnaround signs the US oil rig counts were showing. Approximately 9% of crude oil rigs have been idled in the past six weeks. The crude oil rig count now is the lowest since August 2010.
The crude oil rig count had fallen for 29 weeks until the week ended June 26. Amid crude oil price’s continued weakness, a rig count turnaround looks uncertain once again.
The four-week average reduction in the crude oil rig count was 12 for the week ended October 9. In comparison, the four-week average decrease was also 12 for the week ended October 2. Four-week averages give a smoother view of this trend that otherwise can be quite volatile on a weekly basis.
The crude oil rig count is down by 1,004, or 62%, since hitting 1,609 rigs on October 10, 2014. That week, the crude oil rig count was at its highest level since July 1987, according to Baker Hughes. Lower activity in the oil-rich Permian Basin in West Texas drove most of the fall.
Who gains and who loses?
Crude oil prices have fallen sharply since June of last year, and they still remain on the low side. This is good for drivers and the economy.
However, oil producers such as Denbury Resources (DNR) and Marathon Oil (MRO) had to cut their rigs in operation in order to reduce costs. So, oil companies not only get lower prices for their crude oil production, but their production may also fall.
Falling active rigs are negative for oilfield service companies such as Schlumberger (SLB) and Baker Hughes (BHI). When crude oil rigs decrease like they did last week, oilfield service companies lose revenues.
Lower active rigs can also affect rig operators negatively. These operators include Nabors Industries (NBR) and Precision Drilling (PDS) as well as rig makers National Oilwell Varco (NOV). Nabors Industries accounts for 3.6% of the VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH).
A lower amount of rigs could lead to decreased production, which would lower midstream energy companies’ transportation volumes. This would be negative for midstream MLPs like Plains All American Pipeline (PAA), Williams Partners (WPZ), Genesis Energy (GEL), Targa Resources Partners (NGLS), and Sunoco Logistics Partners (SXL).