uploads///Upstream capex and Margin

Can Upstream Operators’ Capex Affect PTEN’s Margin in 2017?

Alex Chamberlin - Author
By

Jun. 7 2017, Updated 7:36 a.m. ET

Upstream operators’ capex cut

Some of the major US upstream and integrated companies have gradually reduced their capex (capital expenditure) following crude oil’s sharp price fall since mid-2014. From 1Q16 to 1Q17, 19 of the most prominent names in this space, in aggregate, lowered their capex by 21.0%. Lower upstream capex led to lower prices for OFS (oilfield services and equipment) companies’ services and products. That lowered OFS companies’ operating revenues and margins.

Article continues below advertisement

Patterson-UTI Energy’s EBITDA margin

As you can see in the above graph, from 1Q16 to 1Q17, PTEN’s EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization) margin (or EBITDA as a percentage of revenues) fell to 22.5% from 30.3%. The average EBITDA margin for 11 of the most prominent names in the OFS industry didn’t change much during that period. EBITDA margin is a measure of a company’s operating earnings. PTEN makes up 0.01% of the iShares Dow Jones US (IYY). PTEN and IYY both rose ~15.0% in the past year.

EBITDA margin for PTEN’s peers

Core Laboratories’ (CLB) EBITDA margin was 19.4% in 1Q17. Schlumberger’s (SLB) EBITDA was 22.0% that same quarter, while Fairmount Santrol Holdings’ (FMSA) EBITDA margin was 12.0%. You can read more on Schlumberger’s performance in Market Realist’s Schlumberger: Bumpy Roads Might Be in Its Future.

How dependent is Patterson-UTI Energy’s business on the US rig count? We’ll look at that in the next part of this series.

Advertisement

Latest FMSA Holdings Inc News and Updates

    © Copyright 2022 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.