uploads///COP Q Hedging Effectiveness

How Important Is ConocoPhillips’s Hedging Effectiveness?


Jan. 11 2017, Updated 10:35 a.m. ET

ConocoPhillips’s hedging effectiveness

According to ConocoPhillips’s (COP) Form 10Q for 3Q16, COP reported a total non-cash and cash profit of ~$11.0 million on its commodity derivative instruments. Dividing that by ConocoPhillips’s E&P (exploration and production) revenues of ~$3.9 billion gives us a hedging effectiveness of ~0.28%.

In other words, in 3Q16, profits on hedging activities caused ConocoPhillips’s E&P revenues to rise ~0.28%. That’s much better than the previous quarter when its revenues fell ~4.0% due to losses on hedging activities.

Article continues below advertisement

Oil and gas producers that reported losses on hedges

Almost all upstream companies are involved in hedging, but their hedging effectiveness varies due to derivative coverage, hedge types, and hedge prices. For 3Q16, upstream companies W&T Offshore (WTI), California Resources (CRC), and Stone Energy (SGY) have a hedging effectiveness of -0.38%, -3.3%, and -0.21%, respectively.


More From Market Realist

    • CONNECT with Market Realist
    • Link to Facebook
    • Link to Twitter
    • Link to Instagram
    • Link to Email Subscribe
    Market Realist Logo
    Do Not Sell My Personal Information

    © Copyright 2021 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.