Oil Services ETF OIH Disappoints in the Week Ended August 21



The VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF

The VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) lost 9.83% in the week ended August 21. This ETF tracks an index of the top 25 US-listed oilfield equipment and services (or OFS) companies. OIH is a good proxy for playing energy prices because OFS companies’ fortunes tend to be closely linked to those of upstream, or E&P (exploration and production), companies.

Article continues below advertisement

Comparing performances

OIH should mirror the performance of the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP), which tracks an index of predominantly upstream E&P companies. In the week ended August 21, while OIH did indeed closely mirror movements in XOP, XOP fell slightly less than OIH for the week, as you can see in the chart above. Please refer to the previous part of this series to find out more about XOP’s performance.

OIH was the biggest loser among energy stock ETFs in the week ended August 21. As we noted earlier, the United States Oil Fund (USO) fell ~5.43% while the United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) fell 4.98% in the week ended August 21. These commodity ETFs track changes in prompt futures prices.

OFS companies, as their name suggests, provide equipment and services that help E&P companies extract energy, which can range from resource analyses even before a well is drilled to drilling and energy transportation equipment.

As upstream companies expand operations, OFS companies stand to gain. The opposite is also true. So, even though OFS companies tend to have longer-term contracts with upstream companies, any strength or weakness in upstream stocks quickly flows to OFS stocks. Another sector that benefits when upstream companies expand operations is the MLP sector, which includes companies like Magellan Midstream Partners (MMP).

About OIH

OIH tracks a capitalization-weighted index. As we saw with XLE in part one of this series, OIH can also be prone to dominance by a handful of large companies. Industry leaders Schlumberger (SLB) and Halliburton (HAL) together account for almost a third of OIH’s holdings.

Indeed, just the top five holdings, including Baker Hughes (BHI), National Oilwell Varco (NOV), and Cameron International (CAM), together with SLB and HAL, account for about half of OIH’s portfolio. This makes OIH not only a very industry-specific security, but also highly reliant on a handful of big companies’ fortunes.

In the week ending August 21, OIH’s biggest losers included Weatherford International (WFT), which lost ~18%, and Halliburton (HAL), which lost 15%. Silica Holdings (SLCA) lost 14.64% in the same period. These three companies constitute ~17.4% of OIH.


More From Market Realist