uploads///BAC energy exposure

Bank of America and Wells Fargo: Comparing Energy Exposure


Feb. 20 2017, Updated 9:05 a.m. ET

Oil and gas exposure

Investors have expressed concern about the banking sector’s (XLF) exposure to energy-related loans. In 2015 and 2016, plunging oil prices negatively impacted energy companies. Banks that provided loans to these energy companies were then impacted by volatility in the energy sector. Major banks have large oil and gas loan portfolios and with the drop in oil prices, collateral on these loans lost value.

Article continues below advertisement

As a result of these events, banks increased their provisions for losses on these loans. JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Wells Fargo (WFC), and Citigroup (C) also increased their provisions for loan losses tied to the energy sector. Banks with direct exposure to the energy sector are more vulnerable to the fall in oil prices.

Wells Fargo (WFC) seems fairly secure with respect to risks arising from energy-related loans, as its $14.8 billion energy loan portfolio comprises ~1% of its total loan portfolio.

In contrast, Bank of America (BAC) had energy exposure of $19.7 billion in December 2016, and this sector makes up 3.4% of the bank’s total loan portfolio. In our view, Wells Fargo seems better protected against losses of its energy loans.


More From Market Realist

  • CONNECT with Market Realist
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Twitter
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to Email Subscribe
Market Realist Logo
Do Not Sell My Personal Information

© Copyright 2021 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.