Black Knight Financial Services Mortgage Monitor—June 2014

1 2 3 4
Part 4
Black Knight Financial Services Mortgage Monitor—June 2014 PART 4 OF 4

Must-know: Understanding non-qualified mortgage loans

Mortgage originators are moving out on the risk curve

Mortgage originators have had a difficult time over the past year as rates have started increasing. The increase in interest rates stopped the refinance boom in its tracks. As a result, originators have had to focus on the purchase business—a more difficult channel.

Refinance shops were able to put up a website, advertise the best price, and compete for business through awareness and national campaigns. The purchase business is more local and relationship-driven. For this reason, service matters more than price.

Must-know: Understanding non-qualified mortgage loans

Interested in TWO? Don't miss the next report.

Receive e-mail alerts for new research on TWO

Success! You are now receiving e-mail alerts for new research. A temporary password for your new Market Realist account has been sent to your e-mail address.

Success! has been added to your Ticker Alerts.

Success! has been added to your Ticker Alerts. Subscriptions can be managed in your user profile.

The non-QM opportunity

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau produced a list of requirements for a mortgage to be considered a qualified mortgage (or QM). On January 1, the new QM rules took effect. This rule gives the originator safe harbor from being sued by the borrower if they default—provided that certain requirements are met.

The biggest requirement is that the debt-to-income ratio must be below 43%. In other words, the mortgage payment and all other debt service can’t be more than 43% of the borrower’s gross income. Many originators are choosing to stick with QM loans, but some are starting to look at the non-QM opportunity.

Non-QM loans would typically be useful for borrowers with sporadic income, but a large amount of assets. However, lenders will only consider low loan-to-value (or LTV) loans—like 80% maximum, which really is a ceiling. Most lenders are below that. This ensures that the borrower has “skin in the game” and won’t choose to default.

Also, we’re seeing more of the traditional stated income type loan. This is suited for an independent contractor who can demonstrate cash flow through a bank statement, but doesn’t necessarily have W-2 income because they don’t have an employer.

Implications for mortgage REITs

Mortgage originators like PennyMac (PMT) and Nationstar (NSM) are looking at possibilities in the non-QM space. Impac (or IMH) has a non-QM product, but it’s holding it for its own balance sheet. Right now, these loans are unsecuritizable, or at least no one has tried to securitize one.

The only private-label securitizer has been Redwood Trust (RWT). It’s doing strictly high-quality jumbos. Once the private label market comes back, we could see some non-agency real estate investment trusts (or REITs) like Newcastle (NCT) or Two Harbors (TWO) take an interest in non-QM securitized loans.


Please select a profession that best describes you: