ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Supreme court ruling on Friday could reshape the future of Trump-era tariffs

A potential ruling on the legality of the sweeping tariffs may have huge implications on the economy.
PUBLISHED 1 DAY AGO
 U.S. President Donald Trump holds up a chart showing the reciprocal tariffs (Cover image source: Getty Images/Photo by Chip Somodevilla)
U.S. President Donald Trump holds up a chart showing the reciprocal tariffs (Cover image source: Getty Images/Photo by Chip Somodevilla)

President Donald Trump's sweeping emergency tariffs have come under legal scrutiny in the U.S. Supreme Court, apart from widespread criticism. On Tuesday, the court indicated on its website that it could release decisions in argued cases when the justices take the bench during a scheduled sitting on Friday. However, it isn't clear if the ruling on the tariffs will be a part of the verdicts, as the court does not announce ahead of time which rulings it intends to issue.

Representative image of activists outside the Supreme Court on November 5, 2025 (Image source: Getty Images/Photo by Andrew Harnik)
Representative image of activists outside the Supreme Court on November 5, 2025 (Image source: Getty Images/Photo by Andrew Harnik)

The cases challenging the legality of the Trump administration's tariffs have been closely watched for months, as the ruling will have major implications for the U.S. economy and global trade. Previously, on November 5, the conservative and liberal justices heard arguments of the case and appeared to cast doubt on the legality of the tariffs, as the president invoked a 1977 law that is meant for use during national emergencies.

The case challenged the administration's legal authority to use the 'International Emergency Economic Powers Act' to impose the tariffs without congressional approval. After lower courts ruled that the president exceeded his authority, the cases were passed on to the U.S. Supreme Court. Back in November, during the hearings of the cases, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch drew scepticism over the president's authority to take such actions, as per The Hill.

Charts showing the “reciprocal tariffs” the U.S. is charging other countries are on display at the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House on April 2, 2025 (Image source: Getty Images/Photo by Alex Wong)
Charts showing the “reciprocal tariffs” the U.S. is charging other countries are on display at the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House on April 2, 2025 (Image source: Getty Images/Photo by Alex Wong)

Meanwhile, the Republican president has continued to express concern over losing the case and the tariffs being struck down. Last week, he stated that a ruling against the tariffs will be a "terrible blow" to the U.S. on his social media platform, Truth Social. "Because of Tariffs, our Country is financially, AND FROM A NATIONAL SECURITY STANDPOINT, FAR STRONGER AND MORE RESPECTED THAN EVER BEFORE," Trump added in another post on Monday. The court’s 6-3 conservative majority mostly avoided direct confrontations with Trump in 2025 and handed him a series of wins, which drew criticism from lower courts and some judges.

(Image Source: Getty Images| Photo by Chip Somodevilla)
U.S. President Donald Trump holding the board showing the reciprocal tariffs (Image Source: Getty Images| Photo by Chip Somodevilla)

However, as per CNBC, this is likely to change in 2026, as the court has pushed several contentious rulings into the new year. Apart from the tariffs, the court is set to rule on the president's plan to curtail automatic birthright citizenship and his attempt to fire a member of the Federal Reserve’s powerful board of governors, Lisa Cook. The Supreme Court has a long history of delaying ruling until a president has lost some of his post-election power and popularity, before handing out legal losses, as per the publication. The court is now about to issue definitive rulings, not provisional decisions.

Source: GettyImages | Kevin Dietsch  Staff
The U.S. Supreme Court Building (Image source: Getty Images/ Photo by Kevin Dietsch Staff)

As per Reuters, the court has a busy few months ahead of it as it is set to hear arguments on January 13, in a bid to enforce Republican backed state laws that ban transgender athletes from participating in female sports teams at public schools. On January 21, the court will hear arguments on Trump's attempt to remove Cook, a move without precedent that challenges the central bank's independence.

More on Market Realist:

Americans will feel the real impact of Trump's tariffs as economy looks grim in 2026

Trump's tariffs quietly forced 700 American companies to file for bankruptcy in 2025

Wells Fargo urges Americans to stock up on these items ASAP as tariffs could make them pricier

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Analysts have shared their outlook on stocks that will be in focus for 2026.
9 minutes ago
Harvey thought that the answer had to be on the board, and he was surprised.
1 hour ago
It's safe to say that Harvey didn't think people had the habit of tidying up in the morning.
5 hours ago
Harvey was a bit harsh in telling he player that he almost had no chance of winning $20,000
23 hours ago
Harvey got lost in the moment and thought the contestants were yelling at him.
23 hours ago
Becoming a Costco member comes with a lot of perks like great offers on premium products.
1 day ago
Health and Human Services will withhold funds to five Democratic states over suspicions of fraud.
1 day ago
A potential ruling on the legality of the sweeping tariffs may have huge implications on the economy.
1 day ago
People always tie things like big houses and fancy cars to wealth, but the little things matter more
2 days ago
The company had made use of underhanded tactics to enroll customers to its Prime program.
2 days ago
A gigantic victory for the player who had reportedly purchased their ticket online.
2 days ago
While the guest admitted she was in the antiques business, she was still astonished by the estimate.
2 days ago
While businesses absorbed the blow last year, they may run out of reserves in 2026.
2 days ago
Reacting to the muted reaction of the market, Burry says the larger impact is soon to be seen.
2 days ago
The shopper claimed the store's hassle free policy helped him save $170.
3 days ago
Harvey couldn't help but praise the contestant for his smart answer.
3 days ago
The 3 major U.S. oil companies, Chevron, Exxonmobil, ConcoPhillps are still monitoring the situation.
3 days ago
Harvey admitted that he didn't have the childhood that would enlighten him with the right answers
6 days ago
A "call for action" and slogans such as "we want our money back" are found on several posters that are circulating online.
6 days ago