ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Rapper Lil Durk Hit With $12 Million Lawsuit For Reportedly Selling Rights To The Same Song Twice

The case is filed over a fraudulent deal to sell the rights to Lil Durk’s track “Bedtime”.
PUBLISHED DEC 19, 2023
 Lil Durk gained a cult following with the release of his mixtape series, “Signed to the Streets”. Getty Images | Photo by Gonzalo Marroquin
Lil Durk gained a cult following with the release of his mixtape series, “Signed to the Streets”. Getty Images | Photo by Gonzalo Marroquin

A New York-based fintech startup, Exceed Talent Capital, has sued Lil Durk for $12 million accusing the Chicago rapper, his business manager, and the label of “manifest fraud”.

The case is filed over a deal to sell the rights to Lil Durk’s track “Bedtime”. The suit claims that Durk signed deals with two different entities for the same song's rights.



 

 Lil Durk performs during day 3 of Lollapalooza | Getty Images | Photo by Josh Brasted
Lil Durk performs during day 3 of Lollapalooza | Getty Images | Photo by Josh Brasted

Durk Derrick Banks, professionally known as Lil Durk, is a rapper and singer. Durk gained a cult following with the release of his mixtape series, “Signed to the Streets”, which led to Def Jam Recordings signing him. More recently, Durk’s track “All My Life” enjoyed success on the charts. Reaching No. 2 on the Hot 100."



 

However, throughout his career, he has been a subject of litigation for his behind-the-scenes maneuvers, and his recent alleged fraudulent actions surrounding the song rights of "Bedtime" have jeopardized the financial standing of the firm, Exceed Talent Capital.

In a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, Exceed Talent Capital accused Durk, his business manager Andrew Bonsu, and his label OTF of “Manifest Fraud” of selling the rights of a song to different entities. Exceed has accused Durk of selling the rights to his song “Bedtime” to the firm even though he already had an exclusive contract with Sony Music Entertainment’s Alamo Records.

Exceed and Durk announced their partnership last fall, in which Exceed paid the artist for the exclusive rights to transform his track "Bedtime" into a fractional investment opportunity, Hot New Hip Hop reported. They offered fans a “Trenches All-Access Pass,” a sort of NFT that provided fans exclusive access to a private Grand Theft Auto roleplay server custom-built by Lil Durk and his OTF Gaming company. The fans were also offered immediate lifetime access, and dibs on shares from proceeds of the song “Bedtime” as well.



 

However, the startup claimed that it was later blindsided when it discovered that the rapper had an exclusive deal with Alamo Records. This implied that the assertions and guarantees made in the contract with Exceed were deliberately false.

The revelation came to light when Exceed received a cease-and-desist letter from Alamo Records stating that Durk was under an exclusive recording agreement with the firm and he had no authority to sell his recording royalties to any other entity.

Exceed then demanded Durk to refund the $450,000 that it had already paid to the artist. However, the rapper allegedly ignored these pleas, as per the suit. Thus, the suit filed by Exceed claims that Durk committed fraud by entering an agreement with them, and the fallout from the legal affair with Alamo Records proved costly for the firm.

The lawsuit filed by the fintech startup claims that it had to cancel the sale of its scheme after already investing "significant time, effort, and financial resources." They further claimed that they also had to go through the trouble of securing approval from the Securities and Exchange Commission. Ultimately, the firm estimated that the financial implications from the alleged fraud exceed a staggering $12 million. It stated that it has left the firm in a precarious financial position.



 

“Exceed was compelled … to return the funds that had been invested by third parties in the Offering, further significantly damaging Exceed’s reputation and relationships with its partners and investors,” the company wrote, as per a Billboard report.

Exceed has asked to court to award compensatory damages as well as punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, and “costs incurred as a result of Durk’s misconduct.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Hearing the answers, Harvey wondered how the team that won the question got so far in the game
1 day ago
Shopper, creator, @sharpintx fell victim to 'return fraud' in the worst possible way.
1 day ago
Several companies have publicly stated that they are passing on the tariff costs to customers.
1 day ago
The guest was at a loss for words after hearing the value of the Patek Phillippe watch.
2 days ago
The fast food chain has raise prices like other but won over its customer base like none.
2 days ago
BofA Metals Cheif, Michael Widmer estimates gold to hit the $5,000/oz mark in 2026.
2 days ago
Kevin Hassett said it would solely be up to the Fed Officials to make decisions on interest rates.
2 days ago
As per the Congress' Joint Economic Committee, Americans paid over $158 billion in tariff costs
5 days ago
It was clear that the host was expecting much more from the player, as the question had potential.
6 days ago
An expert believes that raising the minimum wages has been a crucial boost for underpaid workers.
6 days ago
Costco keeps its aisle labels vague intentionally to make the shoppers wander around and explore products.
6 days ago
While rate cuts may eventually bring relief, other factors may push costs upwards.
6 days ago
A Politico poll conducted last month found Americans were struggling with spending constraints.
7 days ago
The shopper who was buying coats to donate to the homeless was met with incredible generosity.
7 days ago
The Democratic senators argued that no living/sitting president should have their likeness on a coin.
Dec 10, 2025
The contestant had a slim chance after getting only two out of five guesses right.
Dec 9, 2025
The payments will be funded by the tariff revenue and reach farmers early next year.
Dec 9, 2025
Sweeney's team blatantly broke a rule and the host had to let it go multiple times.
Dec 8, 2025
Dimon reiterated a nuanced and overall upbeat view about the effect of artificial intelligence on the economy.
Dec 8, 2025