ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

You might be eligible to get a part of $60 million settlement — if you’ve used Tinder in the past

The suit alleged Tinder charged older users more for its Gold and Platinum subscriptions
PUBLISHED 1 HOUR AGO
Representative image of a young woman walking past a billboard advertisement for the dating app Tinder (Cover image source: Getty Images/Photo by Sean Gallup)
Representative image of a young woman walking past a billboard advertisement for the dating app Tinder (Cover image source: Getty Images/Photo by Sean Gallup)

Popular online dating app Tinder has agreed to pay $60.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit in the state of California that claimed it charged older users more than younger users for its premium services and subscriptions. According to the suit, the app unfairly charged users over 28 more for its Tinder Plus and Tinder Gold subscriptions, violating the state's laws. While the Match Group-owned platform denied any wrongdoing, it agreed to settle the case, and part of the payout is to the affected users in the state. 

Representative image of the general views of the Tinder Headquarters (Image source: Getty Images/Photo by AaronP/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images)
Representative image of the general views of the Tinder Headquarters (Image source: Getty Images/Photo by AaronP/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images)

What is the lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleged that Tinder violated California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act and Unfair Competition Law by charging older users more than younger users when they opted for premium subscriptions. The suit was filed in 2015 on behalf of user Allan Candelore, who accused the dating platform of discriminating against older users based on their age, according to classaction.org. “Tinder has brazenly announced and employed a multi-tiered pricing plan that treats consumers unequally based solely on their age,” the original lawsuit said. Under the terms of the agreement, the platform did not admit any wrongdoing, but it agreed to pay $60.5 million to resolve the class action suit. 

Representative image of gavel and scales with a US flag (Image source: Getty Images/Stock photo by Simpleimages)
Representative image of gavel and scales with a US flag (Image source: Getty Images/Stock photo by Simpleimages)

Who is eligible for a payment?

As per the lawsuit, over 260,000 users are expected to be eligible for a share of the settlement. It will benefit users who purchased its Plus or Gold subscriptions in California on or after March 2, 2015, when they were over the age of 29, or on/after March 2, 2016, when they were over 28. The affected individuals have until April 18 to specify how they would like to receive the payment. As per the official documents, users can choose PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, ACH, or a mailed check on the settlement website to receive their payments. The payments are expected to vary depending on how much they paid for the two premium subscriptions, the settlement notice added. 

Representative image of a man using a phone in a cafe (Image source: Getty Images/Stock photo by martin-dm)
Representative image of a man using a phone in a cafe (Image source: Getty Images/Stock photo by martin-dm)

Those who haven't received a class member notification need to submit their verification online or mail it by August 19. Furthermore, individuals have until April 8 to either opt out of the suit and not be a plaintiff or object to the settlement in court. The final hearing on the approval of the settlement is scheduled for May 20 in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

This marks another major settlement from a corporation where users are entitled to get a piece of the funds. Earlier, energy drink company ZOA, which is backed by famous actor/wrestler Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, agreed to pay $3 million to settle a suit that alleged the company mislabelled its products. The energy drink maker boasted its products didn't have added preservatives, but the suit alleged that the drinks contained citric acid and ascorbic acid, which function as chemical preservatives. With this, buyers were entitled to get up to $150 if they had purchased the allegedly mislabelled products. 

More on Market Realist: 

Millions of Americans could get $100 checks from State Farm — key details revealed

Starbucks to pay $38.9 million settlement after it violated New York's labor laws

Are you an Android user? You could be eligible for settlement money from Google

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The suit alleged Tinder charged older users more for its Gold and Platinum subscriptions
1 hour ago
The Yoyo Gummy candies are part of an ongoing recall across 14 states over unallowed food dye.
3 hours ago
The two progressives estimate the tax would bring in $4.4 trillion over the next decade.
1 day ago
Hearing the answer, Harvey knew the contestant would need god by his side to save his marriage.
2 days ago
After painfully losing out by 5 points the previous night, the Baccus family made a comeback
2 days ago
Harvey's anecdotes made it clear that he had been through some steamy situations.
3 days ago
Michael Green isn't worried about AI stocks, as a passive investment bubble is a "more salient" risk
3 days ago
The AI assistant app seems to have benefitted from the headlines that emerged after Trump's rant.
3 days ago
AT&T, Verizon Wireless, and T-Mobile have their own spam blocking tools for their subscribers.
3 days ago
The newly introduced Trump accounts have the same tax advantages as IRAs.
5 days ago
While the IMF warned the current administration's policies could make deficits worse.
5 days ago
Fans couldn't believe how a contestant failed to secure just 31 points out of the 200 that his partner had scored.
6 days ago
While the answer touched Harvey's heart, he was sure nobody would do that for a celebrity.
6 days ago
Trump's claims were both partially true and ridiculous, according to industry analysts.
6 days ago
People on social media accused the actor of being a hypocrite, urging him to step up first.
6 days ago
Trump's pledge sounds empty as OBBBA has shaved over $1 trillion in social safety nets funding.
7 days ago
While her answer wasn't technically wrong, the survey begged to differ.
7 days ago
After getting three zeros on the board, Nori had the impossible task of winning with two answers
7 days ago
An underlying stock rotation has triggered a potential countdown to a crash.
7 days ago
Harvey couldn't pass up the opportunity to take a jab at J-Lo's relationship status
Feb 25, 2026