ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

'Shark Tank' offers $500,000 deal to founders whose pitch involved bringing two sheep to the set

Everyone loves to see animals, but they don't expect someone to bring out sheep on national TV.
PUBLISHED MAR 3, 2025
Screenshots showing the entrepreneurs and sheep on "Shark Tank" (Cover image source: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)
Screenshots showing the entrepreneurs and sheep on "Shark Tank" (Cover image source: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)

Anyone who has watched "Shark Tank” long enough knows that almost anything can appear on the sets as part of a pitch by innovative and eccentric entrepreneurs. However, it's extremely rare for someone to turn up with animals on the popular reality show. Laura Schubert and Lillian Tung brought sheep on "Shark Tank" to demonstrate what their brand called 'Fur' was all about. One of the sheep was fully shaved, and the other had huge locks of wool to signify the different amounts of hair that people like to have on their bodies.

The products made by Fur tend to hair in all parts of the body, including the private areas. Schubert and Tung explain that making commercial products for pubic hair was taboo, but they wanted to break those notions. To that end, they wanted $500,000 for 2.5% of the company. “I see dead people,” Daymond John said when he heard it, but the company had solid sales figures to back up its idea. Firstly, they were endorsed by popular actor Emma Watson in 2017, which blew their brand up in the eyes of the public. Tung and Schubert had raised $500,000 all by themselves and were without any other investors or debts. At the time of recording, they said that they were on track to make $5 million that year. The average margin of profit on their products was also impressive. To sum things up, Fur was already a big deal by the time it got to "Shark Tank."

Screenshot showing Lori Grenier with a Fur product on
Screenshot showing Lori Grenier with a Fur product on "Shark Tank" (Image credit: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)

Unsurprisingly, the brand got three offers, as John offered $500,000 for 15%, Kevin O'Leary offered $500,000 for 2.5% along with a $1 per unit royalty, and Lori Greiner then weighed in with her offer of $500,000 for 12% and $50,000 for a charity that promoted body positivity. After some deliberation, the entrepreneurs decided to strike a deal with Grenier for 8%.



 

However, a lot of the deals that seemingly get closed on "Shark Tank" are not legally binding. They’re just verbal agreements, and the paperwork comes later. Fur’s deal with Grenier never happened in real life. Both parties must've failed to find common ground about all the terms of the contract, according to a report in Women. However, that doesn’t mean that the company hasn’t been able to make it big. Just being on the show allowed the brand to expand its consumer base since someone like Emma Watson had already endorsed its product. In 2023, Tung and Schubert won the "Brand of the Year, Body" award at Ulta Beauty's Field Leadership Conference as well.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Fur (@fur_you)


 

"There was definitely increased sales and traffic to our website for sure ... we just think that having the opportunity to get in front of that many people, seeing the comments ... that was really powerful,” Schubert said when asked if the “Shark Tank” episode helped them in any way.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Pressure from the government and consumers choices have forced this decision.
9 hours ago
She took her time to secure the big prize, drawing a loud cheer from the audience.
9 hours ago
The billionaire also predicted that other companies would follow suit in the future.
13 hours ago
His comments have led to several Americans calling him out for not reducing beef prices.
13 hours ago
Billionaires grew their wealth by an incredible 22% in the last year as regular Americans struggled.
13 hours ago
Americans in a Reuters/Ipsos poll identified the cost of living as the primary factor influencing their votes in the upcoming midterms.
15 hours ago
This will be damning for the DHS, which is already under immense pressure from the public.
1 day ago
Experts believe that it has to do with getting a sense of momentary control.
1 day ago
It seemed like the contestant was heading towards defeat, but his luck soon turned around.
1 day ago
The company says it has taken action to protect its rights as an importer to seek duty refunds.
1 day ago
The payout was driven by the company’s financial strength and strong underwriting performance.
1 day ago
Trump made this claim during his lengthy State Of The Union address earlier.
1 day ago
Research predicted that in the consumer sector, "AI personalization strategists" and "AI supply-chain analysts" jobs are expected to emerge.
1 day ago
The product might contain germs as the pasteurization process was not done properly due to a equipment troubleshooting error
2 days ago
The contestant came as close as possible to winning big, but had her heart broken in the end.
2 days ago
Trump failed to address the affordability issue that voters care most about.
2 days ago
He said that society is not quite ready for the pace at which AI is currently displacing workers.
2 days ago
The recall affected products that were sold to customers in four states and in Canada.
2 days ago
Those opposed to the changes believe Trump is politicizing the health of children.
2 days ago
Bessent said that the proposition would be rolled out “in the coming weeks and months,” as a tool for working-class Americans left behind.
2 days ago