ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

AI artist says he lost several million dollars because people 'stole' his work. Oh, the irony.

Other artists have alleged that generative AI tools are enabling the theft of their art.
PUBLISHED OCT 23, 2024
A tattoo artist in the studio design uses virtual reality glasses | (Image source: Getty Images | 	Carlos Duarte)
A tattoo artist in the studio design uses virtual reality glasses | (Image source: Getty Images | Carlos Duarte)

AI has taken the world by storm ever since generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Dall-E sprung onto the scene allowing people to write entire essays and papers, or create art with a few prompts. Two years ago, AI artist, Jason M. Allen made headlines when his artwork 'Théâtre D’opéra Spatial' won a prominent fine arts contest. While Allen disclosed that he created the artwork using the computer program called Midjourney, the judges weren't fully aware of the use of AI. This triggered a debate over the ethical validity of art generated by AI. It also marked the beginning of a battle for Allen who has since been trying to get a copyright for his artwork, as it was being stolen. 



 

Is it Theft?

Back in 2022 when AI image generators were just emerging, Allen's art gained global attention after winning at the Colorado State Fair. This raised questions on the originality of Allen's work while he claimed that he spent more than 110 hours creating the piece named Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial, as per Creative Bloq.

Since AI uses images from all over the internet to create new work, proponents of fine art created without tech argued that it was theft. However, at the time, Allen famously told the New York Times “This isn’t going to stop, art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost." But the tables have been turned and now the artist finds himself defending his own work against theft.



 

Copyright for AI Art Remains Tricky

Following his state fair win, Allen submitted a copyright application for his artwork with the U.S. Copyright Office. However, the Copyright Office rejected his request arguing that it contained an “inextricably merged, inseparable contribution” from both Allen and Midjourney, Vice reported.

Illustrative image of a gavel and block and Intellectual Property Text | Getty Images | stock photo
Illustrative image of a gavel and block during an intellectual property trial | (Image source: Getty Images)

The AI artist then requested the office to reconsider multiple times, but they kept rejecting it. Finally, the Copyright Office Review Board made a final decision saying that Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial wasn’t eligible for copyright protection. Now, Allen claims that people are “blatantly and repeatedly stealing” his art and selling it on sites like Etsy and OpenSea without his permission. 

Losing Millions

The artist filed a lawsuit in September 2024, requesting the Colorado federal court to reverse the Copyright Office’s decision, Vice reported. He argued that a Copyright Examiner "may not be able to distinguish an artwork that used AI tools" which makes the review process "arbitrary" according to him.



 

According to Creative Bloq, Allen claimed that he was losing "several million dollars" without a copyright. "The Copyright Office's refusal to register Theatre D'Opera Spatial has put me in a terrible position, with no recourse against others who are blatantly and repeatedly stealing my work without compensation or credit," the outlet quoted the artist as saying.

AI in Legal Trouble?

On the opposite end of the spectrum, a group of artists filed a lawsuit against Midjourney AI and other related AI companies, alleging copyright infringement. The artists allege that the popular generative AI services were trained on a dataset that included their work and, in some cases, the users of the AI programs could directly reproduce copies of their work without permission.



 

The recently filed lawsuit alleges that Midjourney in particular misled users with a “Midjourney Style List,” which offered the names of 4,700 artists to generate works in their style, according to The Verge.

The AI companies on the other hand have countered the allegations by claiming that the reproductions are rare and difficult and that the training of the programs should be considered legal fair use.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Taking advice from his dad in the audience, Robert chose to play it safe.
1 day ago
The reduction in utility bills will be temporary and residents will end up paying some of that back
1 day ago
The player, Chad Hedrick got the fans to the edge of their seats before scoring the win.
1 day ago
The layoffs are expected to hit the People Experience and Technology units of the retailer.
1 day ago
In the retailer's latest earnings call, CEO Ron Vachris praised the app based checkout system.
2 days ago
The bill aims to overhaul the governance of community associations to increase transparency.
2 days ago
The silicone strings attached to a Yetonamr toy have caused over 30 instances of choking. attached to the toy violate the safety standards and pose as a choking hazard.
2 days ago
The young man earned Harvey's respect with his mature but creative answer.
2 days ago
After the market saw its worst day since October, Trump seemed to soften his threats to the E.U.
3 days ago
The guest had previously bet that her 'His Master's Voice' gramophone wasn't authentic.
3 days ago
At the World Economic Forum, Trump made claims about the economy that the numbers fail to support.
3 days ago
The court is hearing arguments in a case challenging the president's authority to fire Cook.
4 days ago
The sweeping order directs the FTC and DOJ to limit purchase of homes by institutional investors.
4 days ago
Despite the pushback, Trump has made it clear that there is "no going back" on the issue.
4 days ago
Harvey knew the answer wouldn't be on the board as he had some first hand experience.
4 days ago
The guest, who knew about the artist's popularity, didn't expect to get a five-figure appraisal.
5 days ago
New tariffs will follow immediately if the court voids current ones.
5 days ago
Harvey was sure the answer was too weak as he knew women well enough.
5 days ago