ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Restaurateurs Blast Big Tech Vendor for Unexplained Surcharge on Diners: ‘Toast Did Us Dirty'

Restaurateurs are expressing their discontent with Toast's decision to impose the fee as they have no control over it.
PUBLISHED JUL 16, 2023
Cover Image Source: Pexels/Helena Lopes
Cover Image Source: Pexels/Helena Lopes

Something worrying is happening to people who eat at restaurants in America. A cloud-based restaurant management software company based in Boston, Toast Inc. is causing frustration by adding a new fee to online and other orders. This fee of 99 cents goes directly to customers who order $10 or more worth of food and not to the restaurants that use Toast's services, per Fox Business. The charge from Toast appears as a line item on receipts under the term 'order processing fee' and the receipts also have a note at the end, added without input from the shop owner, saying, "The Order Processing Fee is set by Toast to help provide affordable digital ordering services for local restaurants." This has angered both restaurant owners and customers.

Source: GettyImages | Jonas Gratzer  Stringer
Image Source: Jonas Gratzer Stringer/GettyImages 

Restaurateurs are expressing their discontent with Toast's decision to impose the fee as they have no control over it. This lack of control highlights the issue of ceding control over sales mechanisms to third-party vendors like Toast, thereby giving rise to concerns about the violation of ethical and legal standards. Toast processes the sale for client companies when a customer orders food online or pays a bill in a restaurant. Matt Wilhelmson, the owner of Koehn Bakery in Missouri, argues that the fee is not only unethical but should also be deemed illegal. U.S. Representative Mark Alford shares these concerns and plans to address the issue with the House Financial Services Committee to protect retailers and consumers alike.

The introduction of the new fee comes at a time when Toast appears to be facing financial distress. The company reported a net loss of $275 million in 2022 and is projected to fare even worse in 2023, with an $81 million loss in the first quarter alone. In February, Toast partnered with Google, and the new fee was tested in various locations across the country. Despite the financial challenges faced by Toast, the decision to pass the fee on to customers has been met with widespread dissatisfaction.

Toast
Image Source: Toast

Restaurant owners are dismayed by the inclusion of this charge as income, even though the money is deducted directly from customers' bank accounts by Toast. Massachusetts restaurateur Elias Khoury asked of Toast, “These are my customers. Why are you charging my customers?” in an interview with Fox News Digital. "Today it's 99 cents. Tomorrow it could be $2 or $3. It's at their discretion. We have no control over it," added Khoury. He emphasized that the decision to charge customers should be the responsibility of the restaurants themselves, not a third-party vendor. 

Image Source: Igor Starkov/Pexels
Image Source: Igor Starkov/Pexels

In states with meal taxes, the fee is subject to taxation, compounding the financial burden on restaurants. The resentment toward Toast's decision has been echoed on the company's client message forums, with restaurant owners expressing frustration at being punished for a decision they had no control over. Many of the consumers who are being charged these fees have never heard of Toast nor agreed to do business with them. “Toast did us dirty,” one Toast customer fumed on the company’s client forum. Even orders placed through restaurants’ websites are being charged this fee, per New York Post.

Toast defends the new fee as necessary for funding research and development initiatives, claiming that it benefits all parties involved. The company asserts that the fee will support product investments and innovations to enhance restaurants' relationships with their guests. However, many industry experts view the fee as an attempt to bolster Toast's financial position at the expense of restaurants and their customers. Restaurateurs argue that if Toast's business model is unsustainable, the company should renegotiate contracts or seek alternative solutions rather than burdening their customers.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Toast (@toasttab)


 

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
About 1.5 million subscribers were affected by the seven-hour-long outage.
1 day ago
The country in Trump's crosshairs accounts for roughly 4% of the global oil production.
1 day ago
Harvey made the joke at the risk of landing in trouble at home.
2 days ago
Harvey simply said "My Man!" as soon as he heard the player's response.
2 days ago
As president Trump pushes for measures to acquire the island, new poll shows Americans aren't sure.
2 days ago
Trump said starting Feb. 1, his administration will block funds, but he didn't provide specifics.
3 days ago
Harvey did not like the opinion about men that he heard from Maria.
3 days ago
Harvey didn't hold back and even went on to name some of the top celebrities.
3 days ago
Senior editor Charles C.W. Cooke said the cap could destroy the GOP's chances in the midterms
3 days ago
The proposed bill aims to tackle healthcare costs, and cut the federal deficit by $1 trillion.
3 days ago
As ACA benefits expire, the president claimed his framework would reduce drug prices dramatically.
3 days ago
Harvey could not believe that the contestant could say that with her family around.
4 days ago
The family aced three Fast Money rounds in a row to cash out big
4 days ago
The donors poured in millions to support the Trump affiliated super PAC MAGA Inc.
4 days ago
These reports come at a time when consumer sentiment seems to be improving.
4 days ago
The lawmakers called the probe 'coercive' demanding a congressional investigation into the DOJ.
4 days ago
The player bizarrely named "Jeopardy!" in a totally unrelated question.
5 days ago
Seacrest expressed that the player had no way of solving the puzzle with the clues on the board.
Jan 10, 2026
Harvey had to shut every contestant up who thought it was a good answer.
Jan 10, 2026