ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Restaurateurs Blast Big Tech Vendor for Unexplained Surcharge on Diners: ‘Toast Did Us Dirty'

Restaurateurs are expressing their discontent with Toast's decision to impose the fee as they have no control over it.
PUBLISHED JUL 16, 2023
Cover Image Source: Pexels/Helena Lopes
Cover Image Source: Pexels/Helena Lopes

Something worrying is happening to people who eat at restaurants in America. A cloud-based restaurant management software company based in Boston, Toast Inc. is causing frustration by adding a new fee to online and other orders. This fee of 99 cents goes directly to customers who order $10 or more worth of food and not to the restaurants that use Toast's services, per Fox Business. The charge from Toast appears as a line item on receipts under the term 'order processing fee' and the receipts also have a note at the end, added without input from the shop owner, saying, "The Order Processing Fee is set by Toast to help provide affordable digital ordering services for local restaurants." This has angered both restaurant owners and customers.

Source: GettyImages | Jonas Gratzer  Stringer
Image Source: Jonas Gratzer Stringer/GettyImages 

Restaurateurs are expressing their discontent with Toast's decision to impose the fee as they have no control over it. This lack of control highlights the issue of ceding control over sales mechanisms to third-party vendors like Toast, thereby giving rise to concerns about the violation of ethical and legal standards. Toast processes the sale for client companies when a customer orders food online or pays a bill in a restaurant. Matt Wilhelmson, the owner of Koehn Bakery in Missouri, argues that the fee is not only unethical but should also be deemed illegal. U.S. Representative Mark Alford shares these concerns and plans to address the issue with the House Financial Services Committee to protect retailers and consumers alike.

The introduction of the new fee comes at a time when Toast appears to be facing financial distress. The company reported a net loss of $275 million in 2022 and is projected to fare even worse in 2023, with an $81 million loss in the first quarter alone. In February, Toast partnered with Google, and the new fee was tested in various locations across the country. Despite the financial challenges faced by Toast, the decision to pass the fee on to customers has been met with widespread dissatisfaction.

Toast
Image Source: Toast

Restaurant owners are dismayed by the inclusion of this charge as income, even though the money is deducted directly from customers' bank accounts by Toast. Massachusetts restaurateur Elias Khoury asked of Toast, “These are my customers. Why are you charging my customers?” in an interview with Fox News Digital. "Today it's 99 cents. Tomorrow it could be $2 or $3. It's at their discretion. We have no control over it," added Khoury. He emphasized that the decision to charge customers should be the responsibility of the restaurants themselves, not a third-party vendor. 

Image Source: Igor Starkov/Pexels
Image Source: Igor Starkov/Pexels

In states with meal taxes, the fee is subject to taxation, compounding the financial burden on restaurants. The resentment toward Toast's decision has been echoed on the company's client message forums, with restaurant owners expressing frustration at being punished for a decision they had no control over. Many of the consumers who are being charged these fees have never heard of Toast nor agreed to do business with them. “Toast did us dirty,” one Toast customer fumed on the company’s client forum. Even orders placed through restaurants’ websites are being charged this fee, per New York Post.

Toast defends the new fee as necessary for funding research and development initiatives, claiming that it benefits all parties involved. The company asserts that the fee will support product investments and innovations to enhance restaurants' relationships with their guests. However, many industry experts view the fee as an attempt to bolster Toast's financial position at the expense of restaurants and their customers. Restaurateurs argue that if Toast's business model is unsustainable, the company should renegotiate contracts or seek alternative solutions rather than burdening their customers.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Toast (@toasttab)


 

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
It wasn't an ordinary ring but the 2004 Patriots Super Bowl Ring, which Harrison refused to let go.
43 minutes ago
Harvey was in disbelief after he misheard what Ming-Na Wen's teammate said.
1 hour ago
Harvey could feel the pain as he collected the answers from the contestants.
2 hours ago
The owner of Harry Karstens' First Ascent Denali Ice Axe was shocked to learn how valuable it was.
22 hours ago
As model Rachel Reynolds slammed on the brakes, fellow presenter Alexis Gaube nearly fell over.
23 hours ago
Harvey couldn't believe his eyes when an answer did not show up on the board.
1 day ago
The winner, Trish yelled "This cannot be happening!" as she sat in her new car.
1 day ago
The seemingly tough puzzle cost contestant, Kelly Amodio a brand new Mini Cooper.
1 day ago
The contestant, Jodi Hope took home $75,000, using her puzzle solving skills.
1 day ago
The guest had to promise on camera to share the profits with her friend who gifted the item.
2 days ago
Harvey just couldn't seem to understand what Giuliana Rancic's mother was saying.
2 days ago
Harvey had to take a moment to school the contestant on how the game is played.
2 days ago
It seemed like Veronica forgot she was holding the host's hand after the win.
2 days ago
The owner of the Jean-Michel Basquiat Oil Stick Painting made it clear that it wasn't going anywhere
2 days ago
The player, Jason Warren missed out on taking home more than $86,000.
2 days ago
The TikTok creator @thebiteo87 stirred a debate on social media by exposing the new tactic.
3 days ago
Harvey couldn't believe what the NFLPA stars would choose for their wives to wear
3 days ago
Harvey barely held on to the podium after hearing the answers that shook him.
3 days ago