ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Restaurateurs Blast Big Tech Vendor for Unexplained Surcharge on Diners: ‘Toast Did Us Dirty'

Restaurateurs are expressing their discontent with Toast's decision to impose the fee as they have no control over it.
PUBLISHED JUL 16, 2023
Cover Image Source: Pexels/Helena Lopes
Cover Image Source: Pexels/Helena Lopes

Something worrying is happening to people who eat at restaurants in America. A cloud-based restaurant management software company based in Boston, Toast Inc. is causing frustration by adding a new fee to online and other orders. This fee of 99 cents goes directly to customers who order $10 or more worth of food and not to the restaurants that use Toast's services, per Fox Business. The charge from Toast appears as a line item on receipts under the term 'order processing fee' and the receipts also have a note at the end, added without input from the shop owner, saying, "The Order Processing Fee is set by Toast to help provide affordable digital ordering services for local restaurants." This has angered both restaurant owners and customers.

Source: GettyImages | Jonas Gratzer  Stringer
Image Source: Jonas Gratzer Stringer/GettyImages 

Restaurateurs are expressing their discontent with Toast's decision to impose the fee as they have no control over it. This lack of control highlights the issue of ceding control over sales mechanisms to third-party vendors like Toast, thereby giving rise to concerns about the violation of ethical and legal standards. Toast processes the sale for client companies when a customer orders food online or pays a bill in a restaurant. Matt Wilhelmson, the owner of Koehn Bakery in Missouri, argues that the fee is not only unethical but should also be deemed illegal. U.S. Representative Mark Alford shares these concerns and plans to address the issue with the House Financial Services Committee to protect retailers and consumers alike.

The introduction of the new fee comes at a time when Toast appears to be facing financial distress. The company reported a net loss of $275 million in 2022 and is projected to fare even worse in 2023, with an $81 million loss in the first quarter alone. In February, Toast partnered with Google, and the new fee was tested in various locations across the country. Despite the financial challenges faced by Toast, the decision to pass the fee on to customers has been met with widespread dissatisfaction.

Toast
Image Source: Toast

Restaurant owners are dismayed by the inclusion of this charge as income, even though the money is deducted directly from customers' bank accounts by Toast. Massachusetts restaurateur Elias Khoury asked of Toast, “These are my customers. Why are you charging my customers?” in an interview with Fox News Digital. "Today it's 99 cents. Tomorrow it could be $2 or $3. It's at their discretion. We have no control over it," added Khoury. He emphasized that the decision to charge customers should be the responsibility of the restaurants themselves, not a third-party vendor. 

Image Source: Igor Starkov/Pexels
Image Source: Igor Starkov/Pexels

In states with meal taxes, the fee is subject to taxation, compounding the financial burden on restaurants. The resentment toward Toast's decision has been echoed on the company's client message forums, with restaurant owners expressing frustration at being punished for a decision they had no control over. Many of the consumers who are being charged these fees have never heard of Toast nor agreed to do business with them. “Toast did us dirty,” one Toast customer fumed on the company’s client forum. Even orders placed through restaurants’ websites are being charged this fee, per New York Post.

Toast defends the new fee as necessary for funding research and development initiatives, claiming that it benefits all parties involved. The company asserts that the fee will support product investments and innovations to enhance restaurants' relationships with their guests. However, many industry experts view the fee as an attempt to bolster Toast's financial position at the expense of restaurants and their customers. Restaurateurs argue that if Toast's business model is unsustainable, the company should renegotiate contracts or seek alternative solutions rather than burdening their customers.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Toast (@toasttab)


 

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Taking advice from his dad in the audience, Robert chose to play it safe.
1 day ago
The reduction in utility bills will be temporary and residents will end up paying some of that back
1 day ago
The player, Chad Hedrick got the fans to the edge of their seats before scoring the win.
1 day ago
The layoffs are expected to hit the People Experience and Technology units of the retailer.
2 days ago
In the retailer's latest earnings call, CEO Ron Vachris praised the app based checkout system.
2 days ago
The bill aims to overhaul the governance of community associations to increase transparency.
2 days ago
The silicone strings attached to a Yetonamr toy have caused over 30 instances of choking. attached to the toy violate the safety standards and pose as a choking hazard.
2 days ago
The young man earned Harvey's respect with his mature but creative answer.
2 days ago
After the market saw its worst day since October, Trump seemed to soften his threats to the E.U.
3 days ago
The guest had previously bet that her 'His Master's Voice' gramophone wasn't authentic.
3 days ago
At the World Economic Forum, Trump made claims about the economy that the numbers fail to support.
3 days ago
The court is hearing arguments in a case challenging the president's authority to fire Cook.
4 days ago
The sweeping order directs the FTC and DOJ to limit purchase of homes by institutional investors.
4 days ago
Despite the pushback, Trump has made it clear that there is "no going back" on the issue.
4 days ago
Harvey knew the answer wouldn't be on the board as he had some first hand experience.
4 days ago
The guest, who knew about the artist's popularity, didn't expect to get a five-figure appraisal.
5 days ago
New tariffs will follow immediately if the court voids current ones.
5 days ago
Harvey was sure the answer was too weak as he knew women well enough.
5 days ago