ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Byron Allen Loses $100 Million Lawsuit Against McDonald's: What Was The Case?

The suit accused McDonald's of falsely pledgeding an increase of ad spend with Black-owned companies
PUBLISHED FEB 12, 2024
Byron Allen and a McDonald's Sign | Getty Images
Byron Allen and a McDonald's Sign | Getty Images

Byron Allen has lost the $100 million lawsuit against the global fast food chain McDonald’s. In the lawsuit, Allen’s company accused the fast-food giant of lying when it pledged to increase national ad spend with Black-owned outlets by the end of 2024. On Sunday, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge dismissed the lawsuit finding that McDonald’s will likely win the case if it’s allowed to proceed since the company still has more time to live up to its vow, The New York Post reported.



 

Amid racial discrimination allegations, McDonald's in 2021 announced a self-described “four-year plan” to increase its national media spending with Black-owned media companies.

At the time, McDonald’s press release said that the allocation of ad spends in diverse-owned partners including Black, Hispanic, Asian Pacific American, Women, and LGBTQ-owned platforms will increase from 4% to 10% of its national ad spend between 2021 and 2024. The release specifically stated that McDonald’s spending with Black-owned media companies will increase from 2% to 5% in the period.



 

However, assessing the fast-food chain’s plan, Allen’s Weather Group, LLC which operates under the Allen Media Group (AMG) and Plaintiff Entertainment Studios Networks, concluded that McDonald’s had done nothing to stand up to its promise and its press release was a publicity stunt to make business gains.



 

In a declaration to the court, AMG chief revenue officer Darren Galatt stated that they submitted a proposal for $30 million in ad spend to McDonald’s, which was rejected by the company. In turn, the company offered to spend only a fraction of that amount. He further attested that McDonald’s needs to spend roughly $25 million with Black-owned media by this year to stand true to its commitment.

Therefore, the suit which looked for upwards of $100 million alleged that the company committed to promote sales and avoid a mass boycott of its business at the time.



 

Moving for dismissal of the suit, McDonald’s argued that the suit brought on by Allen’s media company was intended to restrict its free speech rights as it is based on a press release, which was part of a national dialogue about racial inequality and systemic racism.

Late last week, Superior Court Judge Mel Red Recana decided McDonald’s motion to strike the initial complaint under the Golden State’s anti-SLAPP statute was applicable and dismissed the suit.

The judge noted that the company did not engage in a “false promise,” as the plaintiffs claim, and emphasized that the lawsuit was premature as the deadline had not passed.

“Defendant still has about 11 months remaining in this year to perform on its promise and commit to spending the necessary amount with Black Owned Media. It is purely speculative to conclude Defendant will not perform on its promise even if Defendant has not yet committed the amount needed in spending,” the judge noted, according to a Deadline report.



 

Further, on the allegation of the plaintiff that McDonald's made the claims to promote the sale of goods or services, the judge stressed that the company never touted its food products in the release.

Following the dismissal of the case, McDonald’s said in a statement that the court’s dismissal proves that “this was just another frivolous lawsuit brought by Byron Allen as part of his smear campaign against” the company.

However, in a report from The Hollywood Reporter, Louis Miller, a lawyer representing the Allen Media Group, said the ruling will be appealed as the California law bars “companies from making false statements to the public.”

Further, there is a parallel suit running against McDonald’s from AMG in federal court. The suit alleged that the company engages in racial stereotyping through a tiered advertising structure that discriminates based on race. “That lawsuit against McDonald’s is alive and well — and is headed for trial,” Miller said in a statement as per the report.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Despite the questionable morality of CATE App, Neal Desai managed to partner with two Sharks.
18 hours ago
A supplier of Costco's Dubai Styled chocolate issued a notice regarding misinformation of allergens.
19 hours ago
While some felt the puzzle was easy, many agreed that the player's letter picks let her down.
22 hours ago
Harvey couldn't believe that a contestant mentioned John Madden as a response to the question.
1 day ago
The host was impressed with the contestant, John Boese's puzzle solving skills.
1 day ago
Despite making a decent offer, Harrison could not make a deal for the rare Mormon Bank Dollar.
1 day ago
The player, Lisa Santangelo, was dumbfounded by a puzzle that was allegedly reused by the show.
2 days ago
The player, Brittany Brock was visibly shaken after the big $40,000 win in the Bonus Round.
2 days ago
Steve Harvey was thoroughly entertained by the plans some of the contestants had for their final hour on Earth.
2 days ago
Costco's executive membership costs $130 annually, and with it, you can enter the store up to an hour earlier on most days.
3 days ago
Not only the contestants, but the audience also took a dig at the host with their survey responses.
3 days ago
The guest was happy that she took the vase from her father's estate after falling in love with it.
4 days ago
Rick Harrison called in a forensic document examiner because he wasn't sure Carlo Gambino would sign his own checks.
4 days ago
The guest always believed his investment in the 1984 Howard Finster painting would pay off one day.
4 days ago
While the player, Kristin Cook was happy to take home over $26,000, fans were disappointed.
5 days ago
The contestant, Erwin Paminiano, was stumped by the Bonus Round puzzle, but took the loss in stride.
5 days ago
The host put his arm around the player, Daryl, and said he was 'shocked' when he got the correct answer.
5 days ago
Once again, Ken Jennings proved that players can have a lot of fun on the serious game show.
6 days ago
While Harvey was expecting to hear some funny responses, the ladies blew his mind with their powerful answers.
6 days ago
The player, Clint Ingalls' disastrous choice of letters gave him no chance in the end.
7 days ago