ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Byron Allen Loses $100 Million Lawsuit Against McDonald's: What Was The Case?

The suit accused McDonald's of falsely pledgeding an increase of ad spend with Black-owned companies
PUBLISHED FEB 12, 2024
Byron Allen and a McDonald's Sign | Getty Images
Byron Allen and a McDonald's Sign | Getty Images

Byron Allen has lost the $100 million lawsuit against the global fast food chain McDonald’s. In the lawsuit, Allen’s company accused the fast-food giant of lying when it pledged to increase national ad spend with Black-owned outlets by the end of 2024. On Sunday, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge dismissed the lawsuit finding that McDonald’s will likely win the case if it’s allowed to proceed since the company still has more time to live up to its vow, The New York Post reported.



 

Amid racial discrimination allegations, McDonald's in 2021 announced a self-described “four-year plan” to increase its national media spending with Black-owned media companies.

At the time, McDonald’s press release said that the allocation of ad spends in diverse-owned partners including Black, Hispanic, Asian Pacific American, Women, and LGBTQ-owned platforms will increase from 4% to 10% of its national ad spend between 2021 and 2024. The release specifically stated that McDonald’s spending with Black-owned media companies will increase from 2% to 5% in the period.



 

However, assessing the fast-food chain’s plan, Allen’s Weather Group, LLC which operates under the Allen Media Group (AMG) and Plaintiff Entertainment Studios Networks, concluded that McDonald’s had done nothing to stand up to its promise and its press release was a publicity stunt to make business gains.



 

In a declaration to the court, AMG chief revenue officer Darren Galatt stated that they submitted a proposal for $30 million in ad spend to McDonald’s, which was rejected by the company. In turn, the company offered to spend only a fraction of that amount. He further attested that McDonald’s needs to spend roughly $25 million with Black-owned media by this year to stand true to its commitment.

Therefore, the suit which looked for upwards of $100 million alleged that the company committed to promote sales and avoid a mass boycott of its business at the time.



 

Moving for dismissal of the suit, McDonald’s argued that the suit brought on by Allen’s media company was intended to restrict its free speech rights as it is based on a press release, which was part of a national dialogue about racial inequality and systemic racism.

Late last week, Superior Court Judge Mel Red Recana decided McDonald’s motion to strike the initial complaint under the Golden State’s anti-SLAPP statute was applicable and dismissed the suit.

The judge noted that the company did not engage in a “false promise,” as the plaintiffs claim, and emphasized that the lawsuit was premature as the deadline had not passed.

“Defendant still has about 11 months remaining in this year to perform on its promise and commit to spending the necessary amount with Black Owned Media. It is purely speculative to conclude Defendant will not perform on its promise even if Defendant has not yet committed the amount needed in spending,” the judge noted, according to a Deadline report.



 

Further, on the allegation of the plaintiff that McDonald's made the claims to promote the sale of goods or services, the judge stressed that the company never touted its food products in the release.

Following the dismissal of the case, McDonald’s said in a statement that the court’s dismissal proves that “this was just another frivolous lawsuit brought by Byron Allen as part of his smear campaign against” the company.

However, in a report from The Hollywood Reporter, Louis Miller, a lawyer representing the Allen Media Group, said the ruling will be appealed as the California law bars “companies from making false statements to the public.”

Further, there is a parallel suit running against McDonald’s from AMG in federal court. The suit alleged that the company engages in racial stereotyping through a tiered advertising structure that discriminates based on race. “That lawsuit against McDonald’s is alive and well — and is headed for trial,” Miller said in a statement as per the report.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The expert needed further tests to be done before confirming the item's authenticity.
10 hours ago
The player kept on winning but the host didn't encourage her to repeat her performance.
11 hours ago
In the celebrity edition of the show, Harvey had a hard time going through with the questions.
12 hours ago
She did not have a lot of confidence when she gave her answer, and her reaction was hilarious.
13 hours ago
While the player got one of the top answers on the board, he put his marriage in jeopardy!
16 hours ago
The old painting turned out to be an early piece from the renowned artist David Hockney.
1 day ago
The player aced the tricky game of 'Gas Money' and, needless to say, she celebrated in style.
1 day ago
Fans were shocked to see how the player couldn't solve one of the easiest puzzles in the show's history.
1 day ago
The company, Scholly, entered the Shark Tank Hall of Fame as it gave a 60x return years later.
1 day ago
After the contestant, Drew Carey broke the board further while trying to fix it...
2 days ago
As it so turned out, a crucial ruling from the judges led to a BIG win for the player.
2 days ago
When a guest brought a precious Charles Rohlfs chair, expert John Sollo confessed that he was nervous to appraise it.
2 days ago
The guest had no idea about the item being a Tiffany product and being embedded with a rare gem.
3 days ago
The host was baffled by the goof up that the contestant made between two words.
3 days ago
Carey showed that he has got the weapon of sarcasm, and he isn't afraid to use it.
3 days ago
Whatever the host was expecting, it was far away from what the contestant said on national TV.
3 days ago
The guest was surprised to learn more about the item he had actually found on the street for free.
3 days ago
After going through everything on the board, the player left Harvey in hysterics with his answer.
4 days ago
As it so turned out, the weird-looking floor lamp was a piece from a very famous studio.
4 days ago
Most contestants were consistently getting the answers wrong, and Harvey was worried about what was next.
5 days ago