ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Economists are worried about Trump's healthcare plan that could be very 'damaging'

The President hopes to make medication cheaper, but he might not have thought it through.
PUBLISHED DEC 25, 2025
US President Donald Trump. (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Win McNamee)
US President Donald Trump. (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Win McNamee)

President Donald Trump's policies have naturally faced criticism from the Democratic Party and have even affected his ratings. But in some cases, even people from his own party find it hard to defend him. Trump has spoken a lot about how the US healthcare system is in dire need of a revamp. However, some of his policies that affect the healthcare sector are drawing flak not just from independent economists, but also from people who are seemingly aligned with his party. The President has been a big supporter of citizens getting medicines at affordable rates, but the way he is going to make that possible might not go down well with many.

According to a report in Raw Story, the President wants to formulate a federal price cap for medication, so that companies are prevented from charging sky-high prices. That seems like a sound policy on paper, but there are a lot of things to consider when it comes to such matters. Trump called his plan TrumpRX, and said that he would use $150 billion in new investments from nine drug companies and a process to convince consumers to buy lower-priced drugs directly from manufacturers.

(Image Source: Getty Images| Photo by Photo by Kevin Dietsch)
US President Donald Trump. (Image Source: Getty Images| Photo by Kevin Dietsch)

The problem with this is that it would raise costs in other areas of the supply chain, in which case, someone always has to bear the financial burden. Experts even believe that this policy will be the reason why US citizens will experience less of the “crown jewel” of the country’s healthcare system. It does not seem like the President or any of his associates thought this one through.

"At the most basic level, government price setting only limits what patients pay for a drug — usually reflected in an out-of-pocket or co-insurance payment," Michael Baker, director of healthcare policy at the American Action Forum, said, before explaining, "This does nothing to address the overall cost of the drug, which someone still has to pay, nor does it lower the cost associated with development. Patients will experience far less of the crown jewel of the U.S. healthcare system that they are currently accustomed to receiving.”

Pills | Pexels | Pixabay
Representative image of medicines. (Image source: Pexels | Pixabay)

Economists from the Heritage Foundation, which is an organization aligned with the President, also criticised this policy. "The kind of government price controls that are most damaging to innovation are ones that limit the initial price a company can charge for a new product. That is the situation in some countries, but fortunately not yet in the United States," Ed Haislmaier, an expert in healthcare policy and markets at The Heritage Foundation, said.

different report by Raw Story states that there are many who are questioning the legality of this policy. The President said that his scheme would allow Americans to purchase medicines at discounted prices from a direct-to-consumer website. However, this might also end up infringing on people’s privacy.

Representative image of a customer buying medicines. (Image credit: Getty Images | Photo by Catherine Delahaye)
Representative image of a customer buying medicines. (Image source: Getty Images | Photo by Catherine Delahaye)

"But here is the real catch: privacy... in order to use this site you'd have to tell the government exactly what medications you take, what conditions you have, when you refill them, everything about yourself, including your medical history, it could be mental health meds, HIV meds, reproductive health meds — everything tied to your name," Eliza Orlins, a public defender and former Manhattan DA candidate explained.

More on Market Realist:

US economy defies expectations with a surge in third quarter — a big win for Trump?

President Trump's image takes a major hit as America is jolted by economic headwinds

Trump administration to seize wages of student loan defaulters - here are the key details

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Americans in a Reuters/Ipsos poll identified the cost of living as the primary factor influencing their votes in the upcoming midterms.
36 minutes ago
This will be damning for the DHS, which is already under immense pressure from the public.
17 hours ago
Experts believe that it has to do with getting a sense of momentary control.
19 hours ago
It seemed like the contestant was heading towards defeat, but his luck soon turned around.
19 hours ago
The company says it has taken action to protect its rights as an importer to seek duty refunds.
22 hours ago
The payout was driven by the company’s financial strength and strong underwriting performance.
23 hours ago
Trump made this claim during his lengthy State Of The Union address earlier.
23 hours ago
Research predicted that in the consumer sector, "AI personalization strategists" and "AI supply-chain analysts" jobs are expected to emerge.
1 day ago
The product might contain germs as the pasteurization process was not done properly due to a equipment troubleshooting error
1 day ago
The contestant came as close as possible to winning big, but had her heart broken in the end.
1 day ago
Trump failed to address the affordability issue that voters care most about.
1 day ago
He said that society is not quite ready for the pace at which AI is currently displacing workers.
1 day ago
The recall affected products that were sold to customers in four states and in Canada.
1 day ago
Those opposed to the changes believe Trump is politicizing the health of children.
2 days ago
Bessent said that the proposition would be rolled out “in the coming weeks and months,” as a tool for working-class Americans left behind.
2 days ago
“It’s a bad idea. We are very alarmed,” a financial source stated about the proposed move.
2 days ago
A post on X could move trillions of dollars due to the power that retail investors hold
2 days ago
Despite a poor start, the contestant came close to winning the big prize.
2 days ago
The retailer had to face big losses as customers abused the no questions asked return policy.
2 days ago
The President is reportedly looking to pass tax breaks using reconciliation.
2 days ago