ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Economists are worried about Trump's healthcare plan that could be very 'damaging'

The President hopes to make medication cheaper, but he might not have thought it through.
PUBLISHED 2 HOURS AGO
US President Donald Trump. (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Win McNamee)
US President Donald Trump. (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Win McNamee)

President Donald Trump's policies have naturally faced criticism from the Democratic Party and have even affected his ratings. But in some cases, even people from his own party find it hard to defend him. Trump has spoken a lot about how the US healthcare system is in dire need of a revamp. However, some of his policies that affect the healthcare sector are drawing flak not just from independent economists, but also from people who are seemingly aligned with his party. The President has been a big supporter of citizens getting medicines at affordable rates, but the way he is going to make that possible might not go down well with many.

According to a report in Raw Story, the President wants to formulate a federal price cap for medication, so that companies are prevented from charging sky-high prices. That seems like a sound policy on paper, but there are a lot of things to consider when it comes to such matters. Trump called his plan TrumpRX, and said that he would use $150 billion in new investments from nine drug companies and a process to convince consumers to buy lower-priced drugs directly from manufacturers.

(Image Source: Getty Images| Photo by Photo by Kevin Dietsch)
US President Donald Trump. (Image Source: Getty Images| Photo by Kevin Dietsch)

The problem with this is that it would raise costs in other areas of the supply chain, in which case, someone always has to bear the financial burden. Experts even believe that this policy will be the reason why US citizens will experience less of the “crown jewel” of the country’s healthcare system. It does not seem like the President or any of his associates thought this one through.

"At the most basic level, government price setting only limits what patients pay for a drug — usually reflected in an out-of-pocket or co-insurance payment," Michael Baker, director of healthcare policy at the American Action Forum, said, before explaining, "This does nothing to address the overall cost of the drug, which someone still has to pay, nor does it lower the cost associated with development. Patients will experience far less of the crown jewel of the U.S. healthcare system that they are currently accustomed to receiving.”

Pills | Pexels | Pixabay
Representative image of medicines. (Image source: Pexels | Pixabay)

Economists from the Heritage Foundation, which is an organization aligned with the President, also criticised this policy. "The kind of government price controls that are most damaging to innovation are ones that limit the initial price a company can charge for a new product. That is the situation in some countries, but fortunately not yet in the United States," Ed Haislmaier, an expert in healthcare policy and markets at The Heritage Foundation, said.

different report by Raw Story states that there are many who are questioning the legality of this policy. The President said that his scheme would allow Americans to purchase medicines at discounted prices from a direct-to-consumer website. However, this might also end up infringing on people’s privacy.

Representative image of a customer buying medicines. (Image credit: Getty Images | Photo by Catherine Delahaye)
Representative image of a customer buying medicines. (Image source: Getty Images | Photo by Catherine Delahaye)

"But here is the real catch: privacy... in order to use this site you'd have to tell the government exactly what medications you take, what conditions you have, when you refill them, everything about yourself, including your medical history, it could be mental health meds, HIV meds, reproductive health meds — everything tied to your name," Eliza Orlins, a public defender and former Manhattan DA candidate explained.

More on Market Realist:

US economy defies expectations with a surge in third quarter — a big win for Trump?

President Trump's image takes a major hit as America is jolted by economic headwinds

Trump administration to seize wages of student loan defaulters - here are the key details

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The President hopes to make medication cheaper, but he might not have thought it through.
2 hours ago
It seems like things are about to get a lot worse before they get better.
3 hours ago
The shopper was charged more than $80 for her items, and she might have paid that as well.
6 hours ago
The decision makes a lot of sense for the retailer in terms of morale and finances.
23 hours ago
The numbers were unexpected, and those in power will hope to make the most out of this situation.
23 hours ago
This will not be good news for Republicans ahead of the next midterm elections.
1 day ago
No one would want to eat a radioactive shrimp ahead of the holiday season.
1 day ago
The Trump administration will have its hands full if this situation truly unfolds next year.
1 day ago
With the Midterms next year, this crisis has become one of the key areas of conversation.
1 day ago
Gyms are predicted to be popular in 2026 despite the advent of at-home fitness and virtual exercises, according to 86% of Americans surveyed.
2 days ago
The host was not impressed with the question and said that it was shame that he knew the answers.
2 days ago
He was overjoyed at first but that quickly turned into bitter disappointment.
2 days ago
“Our AI-powered inventory management system is essential for supplying customers with what they need, when they need, and at the low costs," it stated.
2 days ago
 “A program that provides roughly $50 an acre will not save the thousands of family farms that will go bankrupt before the end of the year," an expert stated.
2 days ago
"This is another reason why I don’t like the Phrase category in the Bonus Round," a fan reacted.
2 days ago
The host of the show was shocked upon hearing the answer and had to speak to the contestant's wife.
2 days ago
Reports suggest these three companies with strong ties to AI can make it to the coveted club.
2 days ago
Money manager Loius Navellier thinks the U.S. GDP could grow by 5% in 2026.
2 days ago
The contestant could have comfortably won the round but it was not meant to be.
2 days ago
The retailer's low price point may be a positive but product quality still matters.
2 days ago