ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Teacher wins a house worth $2.6 million in lottery, but ends up with $6,600 instead due to a loophole

She was only offered $6,600 as a “goodwill gesture” for being the winner. 
UPDATED DEC 6, 2024
Representative image of a woman receiving house keys (Cover image source: Pexels)
Representative image of a woman receiving house keys (Cover image source: Pexels)

A schoolteacher from Radford, Nottingham, UK was left heartbroken after she was denied over a $2.6 million (£2 million) house that she won fair and square. Loretta Buchanan, who participated in the "Win My Home" contest, was paraded as a winner in a video posted on the contest's now-defunct website, per Daily Mail UK. Buchanan, who was knocked off her feet, was excited to finally move out of her cramped flat. However, when the time came to move, her prize was denied by the contest due to technical issues.

Representational image showing a lottery game (Image source: Pexels | Anderson Rodrigues)
Representational image showing a lottery game (Image source: Pexels | Anderson Rodrigues)

A loophole shattered her dreams of owning a house

As per reports, the terms and conditions on the contest's website said that in case the company fails to reach £2.5 million (~$3.3 million) of net sales in lottery tickets, then the winner will only receive 50% of the net proceeds. 

Further, as per emails reviewed by Nottinghamshire Live, the competition organizers claimed that in Buchanan's case, they made a loss as they spent nearly £200,000 ($267,000) on "marketing costs" and didn't sell enough tickets to cover it. So only £5,000 ($6600) was offered as a  “goodwill gesture” to the winner. 

Speaking from her cramped council flat in Nottingham, Buchanan told MailOnline: "I was promised a new home, but I got the booby prize." She said she won the property fair and square but was badly let down and left devastated. 

Buchanan told Nottinghamshire Live that two people came to her residence and said she had won the contest. However, when she asked for the keys, they told her that she hadn't won the home and could only get the compensation.

Representative image by Freepik
Representative image showing keys to a house (Image source: Freepik)

"I entered it thinking this could be a new start, maybe it might happen," she said. She further added that she got messages on social media from people congratulating her on her win and when she told them she hadn't won, they thought she was lying. 

"I need everyone to stop saying congratulations. It's not that I'm not grateful for the £5,000," she told the local news outlet. 

A twist in the story

When MailOnline reached out to the owner of the property Elliott Andrew, he claimed that there was no link between him and the organisers of Win My Home. However, the publication later learned that Andrew was dating a glamorous Ukrainian businesswoman, Yevheniia Levytska, who was the sole director of Win My Home. 

Andrew later told MailOnline that the firm had approached him to raffle off his property, but no agreement was reached. However, he didn't explain why Win My Home was registered at his address when it was founded.  



 

The publication also concluded that it was Andrew's partner Levytska who came to Buchanan's house in a flashy Tesla car to inform her about the win (loss). Thus, the school teacher told MailOnline that she was speaking to a lawyer about taking legal action against the company to get justice. 

"The competition is a scandal and should be investigated, and I am now looking to see what rights I have with the Financial Ombudsman," she said. She also warned anyone looking to participate in the contest or any such similar competition in the future.

This article originally appeared 2 months ago.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The companies that were linked to the recalled products were Food To Live and Africa Imports.
1 day ago
This is perhaps the biggest incentive shoppers have received this year to become a member.
1 day ago
The tariffs on beef-exporting countries and resources have put pressure on the U.S. supply chain
1 day ago
The deals were struck with four countries, which will exempt certain essential items from tariffs.
1 day ago
They blamed it on the Democrats because they were responsible for the shutdown.
1 day ago
In its analysis, Gartner, Inc found that 25% of IT jobs will be done by AI by 2030.
2 days ago
A recent analysis by UBS suggests the tariffs are holding inflation steady and troubling Americans.
2 days ago
Some fans only want the host to give the clues to the contestants instead of an outsider.
2 days ago
The current price of the item is $16.99, which is several times higher than the $9.99 it used to be.
2 days ago
Fans were clearly not happy after two straight losses in the Bonus Round.
3 days ago
Costco one is sold for a premium price, making it a lot less affordable than the Walmart one.
3 days ago
The retail giant would not want one of its best seasonal products to remain unsold.
3 days ago
This move would severely hurt businesses and consumers will have to pay a lot more.
3 days ago
The contestant was momentarily disappointed, but she was happy to have won more than $17,000.
4 days ago
Those interested can avail the Walmart Plus membership for $49 instead of the usual $98 for a year.
4 days ago
No one saw this coming, but it doesn't mean the product won't return to the shelves again.
4 days ago
Several businesses are offering free meals to current and former military personnel on November 11.
4 days ago
Emmer believed that the President had inherited a broken economy from the previous administration.
5 days ago