ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Woman takes weatherman to court for predicting sunshine. She won $1,000 because it rained

"I feel like that weatherman got robbed. Legally robbed"
PUBLISHED SEP 1, 2024
Representative image of a 1970s Television Weather Person | Getty Images | Photo by H. Armstrong Roberts/Classicstock
Representative image of a 1970s Television Weather Person | Getty Images | Photo by H. Armstrong Roberts/Classicstock

The weather dictates several aspects of people's lives. From work to leisure, plans are made according to the weather and predictions shared by the MET department. In extreme cases like adventure sports, predictions are crucial. So when things go south, it is natural for people to feel frustrated. A woman from Israel decided to take the weatherman from a local news channel to court for getting the prediction wrong. Surprisingly, she ended up winning as the news channel agreed to fulfil her demands, as per Prezi.com.

Representative image of a lightning Bolt Discharge Over City Buildings in Texas | Getty Images | Photo by A Bolesta/Classicstock
A lightning bolt discharge over city buildings in Texas | Getty Images | Photo by A Bolesta/Classicstock

In this case from 1996, the woman from Haifa sued local news station Channel 2 and its weather forecaster Danny Rup for $1,000 in a small claims court. She claimed that Rup had predicted on television that a particular day would be sunny. Kahane Law reported that the woman followed Rup’s forecast and decided to leave home dressed lightly. 

However, the weather on the day turned out to be the opposite of sunny with heavy rains and a storm. The woman claimed that she ended up being inappropriately dressed and ultimately caught the flu. She mentioned that she missed out on four days of work, had to spend $38, and suffered from stress. So she sought $1,000 in damages from the news station and wanted Rup to apologize for sharing a wrong prediction.

Representative image | Unsplash | Photo by Clay LeConey
Representative image | Unsplash | Photo by Clay LeConey

While the suit was seemingly frivolous, the woman's demands weren't outrageous. The channel ended up settling the case out of court and paid the woman $1,000. Not only that, she also got an apology from the weatherman. While the case pertains to a common problem for people, it remains a unique one. If today, people start suing weathermen for wrong predictions, channels would run out of money. 

The case was shared in a post on Reddit where people debated its merits. Most people in the comments sided with the weatherman. "I feel like that weatherman got robbed. Legally robbed," wrote one user u/Falsus.

Meanwhile, another user suggested that the case wouldn't last in the U.S. "I don’t know what the law is in Israel... but I’m pretty sure in the US a judge would have tossed this case in a heartbeat," wrote u/farmerarmor. 

The case does make people wonder if the same can be done in the U.S. In a blog post, defense attorney, Lauren J. Morask writes that it may not be possible to replicate in the U.S. The law practitioner wrote that people have tried in the past to sue authorities for damages caused by wrong predictions.

Representative image of Meteorologist Chris Landsea with the National Hurricane Center | Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle
Meteorologist Chris Landsea with the National Hurricane Center | Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle

But in the US the cases were brought against the federal government for failing to protect them and warn them about the extreme weather. This is because, as per the Federal Tort Claims Act, the government can be sued for a negligent act or misrepresentation committed by a person representing the government. However, the majority of cases were thrown out by the court, she mentions.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The companies that were linked to the recalled products were Food To Live and Africa Imports.
1 day ago
This is perhaps the biggest incentive shoppers have received this year to become a member.
1 day ago
The tariffs on beef-exporting countries and resources have put pressure on the U.S. supply chain
1 day ago
The deals were struck with four countries, which will exempt certain essential items from tariffs.
1 day ago
They blamed it on the Democrats because they were responsible for the shutdown.
1 day ago
In its analysis, Gartner, Inc found that 25% of IT jobs will be done by AI by 2030.
2 days ago
A recent analysis by UBS suggests the tariffs are holding inflation steady and troubling Americans.
2 days ago
Some fans only want the host to give the clues to the contestants instead of an outsider.
2 days ago
The current price of the item is $16.99, which is several times higher than the $9.99 it used to be.
2 days ago
Fans were clearly not happy after two straight losses in the Bonus Round.
3 days ago
Costco one is sold for a premium price, making it a lot less affordable than the Walmart one.
3 days ago
The retail giant would not want one of its best seasonal products to remain unsold.
3 days ago
This move would severely hurt businesses and consumers will have to pay a lot more.
3 days ago
The contestant was momentarily disappointed, but she was happy to have won more than $17,000.
4 days ago
Those interested can avail the Walmart Plus membership for $49 instead of the usual $98 for a year.
4 days ago
No one saw this coming, but it doesn't mean the product won't return to the shelves again.
4 days ago
Several businesses are offering free meals to current and former military personnel on November 11.
4 days ago
Emmer believed that the President had inherited a broken economy from the previous administration.
5 days ago