ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

CFPB Caps Credit Card Late Fees at $8: Critics Divided on Consumer Impact

CFPB claims the new rule will save Americans over $10 million in late credit card payment fees.
PUBLISHED MAR 6, 2024
Photo illustration of the Visa, Mastercard and American Express logos | Getty Images | Photo by Matt Cardy
Photo illustration of the Visa, Mastercard and American Express logos | Getty Images | Photo by Matt Cardy

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) finalized a rule on Tuesday to ban excessive late fees charged by credit card companies. The new rule will cut late fees from $31 to just $8 when it comes into effect. The agency claims that it will close a loophole that large card issuers exploited and save Americans over $10 million in late credit card payment fees. As per CFPB’s estimates, there will be an average savings of $220 per year for over 45 million people who are charged late fees by card companies.



 

The crackdown on late fees comes as part of the broader initiative taken up by the Biden administration to limit so-called junk fees. Biden announced the battle against hidden surcharges that consumers pay on credit cards, loans, and hotel rooms.

"Today's rule ends the era of big credit card companies hiding behind the excuse of inflation when they hike fees on borrowers and boost their bottom lines," Rohit Chopra, Director of CFPB, said in a statement.

However, major financial institutions, legislators, and industry groups representing big banks and credit card issuers see the rule with skepticism with many opposing it. The opposers of the rule argue that it could force them to raise interest rates and charge consumers to compensate for costs accrued over late payments.



 

CFPB’s new rule stems from the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009, which introduced several reforms and banned credit card companies from charging excessive fees.

However, the CARD Act instructed banks to charge late fees only to recover their costs in collecting the tardy payments. This was deemed as a loophole by the CFPB which it claims allowed credit card issuers to skirt the rules by charging less than $25 for the first late payment fee and then ramping the charges up to $35. With inflation adjustments, this fee was pushed to $30 and $41 respectively.



 

This cost American families over $14 billion a year in late fees, according to the CFPB. Thus, with the new rule, the agency aims to close the loophole and limit late payment fees to $8.

Card issuers have slammed the latest rule, warning that it could ultimately hurt consumers by reducing competition and increasing the cost of credit. They have also argued that the rule will cause people to pay late which in turn forces issuers to limit credit access to those who may need it more.



 

American Bankers Association President and CEO Rob Nichols said, "Today’s flawed final rule will not only reduce competition and increase the cost of credit, but will also result in more late payments, higher debt, lower credit scores, and reduced credit access for those who need it most," in a press release shared with Fox News Digital.

Nichols added that this rule should not be allowed to go into effect.

Senator Tim Scott, R-S.C. has announced plans to fight the new rule and its implementation. Scott has argued that the new rule will reduce credit availability and increase interest rates for borrowers.

“Lawful and contractually agreed upon payment incentives promote financial discipline and responsibility," Scott said in a press release on Tuesday. The Senator stated that he will be using the Congressional Review Act process to fight the implementation of CFPB’s rule.

Furthermore, the Consumer Bankers Association (CBA), which represents the nation’s largest retail banks like Capital One, Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo also criticized the new rule.

"The rule’s policy goals are, at best, consumer redistribution, not consumer protection. Equally concerning is that this rule continues the CFPB’s deeply problematic practice of rushing to prioritize headlines at the expense of legal process,” CBA President and CEO Lindsey Johnson said in a Tuesday statement, ABC7 reported.



 

Johnson argued that the rule will only benefit a small section of the cardholders who miss deadlines and hurt about 74% of the cardholders who pay dues on time through increased interest rates and costs that card issuers will be forced to implement to offset costs.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The expert who examined the helmet using an X-ray gun was bowled over by what he discovered.
4 hours ago
The World War II veteran had no family to take care of him, hence the staff stepped forward.
8 hours ago
He had no car or furniture, and his mobile home was almost empty except for a TV.
11 hours ago
While the contestants believed they had the truth backing them, they also had great obstacles.
23 hours ago
She also specifically mentioned the types of cookies more likely to contain the lost stone.
1 day ago
The drawing signed by the artist was auctioned off after being displayed in a museum for years.
1 day ago
The USDA released a 326-page document about all the products that have been recalled.
1 day ago
The auction had previously raised eyebrows but that was before Chatila revealed his plan.
1 day ago
The customer who was influenced by the "Tips for Jesus" movement, left everyone disappointed.
1 day ago
The 90-year journey of the painting from Europe to a shop in California still remains a mystery.
2 days ago
A random purchase on the way back home made her celebration of life even better.
2 days ago
He happened to grab the blanket after his grandmother died and held on to it for seven years.
2 days ago
He was expected to make a move after TNT lost the broadcasting rights for the NBA.
2 days ago
She's married with two kids, but she's been chatting about everything with this person, from morning meals to steamy shower scenes.
3 days ago
Franco was feeling so lucky while buying those tickets, that he even thought of winking at a camera.
3 days ago
Although the auction house did not reveal if an expert was consulted, the painting did trigger a bidding war.
3 days ago
The list clearly shows that lessons have not been learned despite the surge in cyber-crime.
3 days ago
"I'll take the blame for that. Ronnie, I'm so sorry," the host told the contestant.
3 days ago
The woman was told by the management that they had received dozens of complaints against her.
4 days ago
One of the women said she had no idea that the other had such a bill and was just riding along.
4 days ago