ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

'Shark Tank' judge invests $100,000 in a product — moments after she dismissed it as a 'gimmick'

Things took a turn for the better with the shark as far as the entrepreneurs were concerned.
PUBLISHED JUL 12, 2025
Screenshots showing Bethenny Frankel (L) and the entrepreneurs on "Shark Tank." (Cover image source: YouTube | Shark Tank Global)
Screenshots showing Bethenny Frankel (L) and the entrepreneurs on "Shark Tank." (Cover image source: YouTube | Shark Tank Global)

“Shark Tank” investors are some of the sharpest minds in the business, and they always have their eyes on the potential and profits that a venture offers, beyond their personal opinions. On many occasions, sharks have refused to offer a deal to entrepreneurs even after being impressed by their pitches, and sometimes they may back a product that they aren't fond of. That happened when a couple of entrepreneurs pitched an innovative solution for hair removal. Guest shark Bethenny Frankel believed that the product was nothing more than a gimmick, but ended up teaming up with another shark and investing $100,000 in the company.

Founders Jennifer Paschall and Gita Vasseghi sought $100,000 for a 25% stake in their company, No Mo-Stache, which sells products to facilitate the removal of hair from the upper lip. The entrepreneurs claimed that, unlike traditional waxing, their product, which is essentially a waxing strip, did not require a high temperature.

The strips also came in small containers, which were portable and could be used anywhere. While waxing strips aren’t anything new, the innovation was the portability and discretion. The entrepreneurs claimed to have made $400,000 from sales, but the guest shark did not believe that their product was special or unique.

Screenshot showing the product on
Screenshot showing the product on "Shark Tank." (Image source: YouTube | Shark Tank Global)

“I really do think this is a gimmick. It’s what you buy on the way out of the lingerie store,” she said. Robert Herjavec challenged her notion and said, “It’s a $400,000 gimmick.” The product at one point was in all 200 Sephora stores across the country, but the number had come down to 60.

While this was a concern, some of the sharks still saw value in the product. Kevin O’Leary, who had been ranting about how there was nothing proprietary about the product, perhaps saw the numbers and changed his mind. He offered $100,000 for a 10% stake and a $1 per strip royalty until he received $300,000.

Screenshot showing Kevin O'Leary on
Screenshot showing Kevin O'Leary on "Shark Tank." (Image source: YouTube | Shark Tank Global)

However, Frankel also believed the product needed rebranding as a part of an emergency kit for women. She asked for 40% of the business for $100,000. Lori Greiner liked the idea and wanted to be part of the deal with Frankel.

Mr. Wonderful then made his offer better and reduced his royalty to 50 cents per strip. Frankel and Greiner then offered $100,000 for 35% and a $1 royalty per strip until the money is recovered. The entrepreneurs were not keen on giving up that much of their company. Therefore, they offered 25% of the company for $100,000 along with a $1 royalty until $200,000 was paid. That was an agreeable deal for all parties, and they ended up shaking on it.

More on Market Realist:

'Shark Tank' offers a life-changing deal to entrepreneur who cut her hair boldly on live TV

'Shark Tank' offers a life-changing deal to founders who gave the investors a brand new look

'Shark Tank' contestants get the judges to wear wigs before making them fight for a deal

RELATED TOPICS SHARK TANK
MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The President recently signed an order barring corporations from buying single family homes.
4 hours ago
If consumed the product could prove fatal for those with a peanut allergy.
4 hours ago
She missed out on the car by just one number, which must have been painful.
4 hours ago
Regional grocers had a fantastic performance as they took the top three spots in the rankings.
4 hours ago
They wished to remain anonymous and took some time to seek financial and legal advice.
7 hours ago
Increased consumer spending, exports, government expenditure, and investment drove the U.S. economy's 2.5% annualized growth rate.
9 hours ago
"The A was a good guess but the B or the O could be used. Q is a rare letter but not frequently used here," a fan reacted.
15 hours ago
She had a good feeling about the item when she saw it but she wasn't sure of its value.
1 day ago
The overhaul comes as a direct result of the Trump administration's aggressive budget cuts.
1 day ago
She did not put a foot wrong in her performance which left fans and the cast impressed.
1 day ago
He also credited US President Donald Trump for his vision of re-industrialization with AI.
1 day ago
His comments were made in response to a Danish pensioner pulling their investment from the US.
1 day ago
This ruling reflects growing trade tensions between the US and Europe amidst the Greenland crisis.
1 day ago
She did not win much but it would have been better than going home empty-handed.
2 days ago
Brian Moynihan told Fox that a number of factors will contribute to the US GDP growth.
2 days ago
The President has a desire to take control of Greenland, threatening allies with tariffs.
2 days ago
It seems like the people of Denmark are replying to the US by using their own tactics.
2 days ago
It is part of a program running from 2017 which has seen almost $7 billion in payouts.
2 days ago