ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

'Shark Tank' judge invests $100,000 in a product — moments after she dismissed it as a 'gimmick'

Things took a turn for the better with the shark as far as the entrepreneurs were concerned.
PUBLISHED JUL 12, 2025
Screenshots showing Bethenny Frankel (L) and the entrepreneurs on "Shark Tank." (Cover image source: YouTube | Shark Tank Global)
Screenshots showing Bethenny Frankel (L) and the entrepreneurs on "Shark Tank." (Cover image source: YouTube | Shark Tank Global)

“Shark Tank” investors are some of the sharpest minds in the business, and they always have their eyes on the potential and profits that a venture offers, beyond their personal opinions. On many occasions, sharks have refused to offer a deal to entrepreneurs even after being impressed by their pitches, and sometimes they may back a product that they aren't fond of. That happened when a couple of entrepreneurs pitched an innovative solution for hair removal. Guest shark Bethenny Frankel believed that the product was nothing more than a gimmick, but ended up teaming up with another shark and investing $100,000 in the company.

Founders Jennifer Paschall and Gita Vasseghi sought $100,000 for a 25% stake in their company, No Mo-Stache, which sells products to facilitate the removal of hair from the upper lip. The entrepreneurs claimed that, unlike traditional waxing, their product, which is essentially a waxing strip, did not require a high temperature.

The strips also came in small containers, which were portable and could be used anywhere. While waxing strips aren’t anything new, the innovation was the portability and discretion. The entrepreneurs claimed to have made $400,000 from sales, but the guest shark did not believe that their product was special or unique.

Screenshot showing the product on
Screenshot showing the product on "Shark Tank." (Image source: YouTube | Shark Tank Global)

“I really do think this is a gimmick. It’s what you buy on the way out of the lingerie store,” she said. Robert Herjavec challenged her notion and said, “It’s a $400,000 gimmick.” The product at one point was in all 200 Sephora stores across the country, but the number had come down to 60.

While this was a concern, some of the sharks still saw value in the product. Kevin O’Leary, who had been ranting about how there was nothing proprietary about the product, perhaps saw the numbers and changed his mind. He offered $100,000 for a 10% stake and a $1 per strip royalty until he received $300,000.

Screenshot showing Kevin O'Leary on
Screenshot showing Kevin O'Leary on "Shark Tank." (Image source: YouTube | Shark Tank Global)

However, Frankel also believed the product needed rebranding as a part of an emergency kit for women. She asked for 40% of the business for $100,000. Lori Greiner liked the idea and wanted to be part of the deal with Frankel.

Mr. Wonderful then made his offer better and reduced his royalty to 50 cents per strip. Frankel and Greiner then offered $100,000 for 35% and a $1 royalty per strip until the money is recovered. The entrepreneurs were not keen on giving up that much of their company. Therefore, they offered 25% of the company for $100,000 along with a $1 royalty until $200,000 was paid. That was an agreeable deal for all parties, and they ended up shaking on it.

More on Market Realist:

'Shark Tank' offers a life-changing deal to entrepreneur who cut her hair boldly on live TV

'Shark Tank' offers a life-changing deal to founders who gave the investors a brand new look

'Shark Tank' contestants get the judges to wear wigs before making them fight for a deal

RELATED TOPICS SHARK TANK
MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The companies that were linked to the recalled products were Food To Live and Africa Imports.
2 days ago
This is perhaps the biggest incentive shoppers have received this year to become a member.
2 days ago
The tariffs on beef-exporting countries and resources have put pressure on the U.S. supply chain
2 days ago
The deals were struck with four countries, which will exempt certain essential items from tariffs.
2 days ago
They blamed it on the Democrats because they were responsible for the shutdown.
2 days ago
In its analysis, Gartner, Inc found that 25% of IT jobs will be done by AI by 2030.
3 days ago
A recent analysis by UBS suggests the tariffs are holding inflation steady and troubling Americans.
3 days ago
Some fans only want the host to give the clues to the contestants instead of an outsider.
3 days ago
The current price of the item is $16.99, which is several times higher than the $9.99 it used to be.
3 days ago
Fans were clearly not happy after two straight losses in the Bonus Round.
4 days ago
Costco one is sold for a premium price, making it a lot less affordable than the Walmart one.
4 days ago
The retail giant would not want one of its best seasonal products to remain unsold.
4 days ago
This move would severely hurt businesses and consumers will have to pay a lot more.
4 days ago
The contestant was momentarily disappointed, but she was happy to have won more than $17,000.
5 days ago
Those interested can avail the Walmart Plus membership for $49 instead of the usual $98 for a year.
5 days ago
No one saw this coming, but it doesn't mean the product won't return to the shelves again.
5 days ago
Several businesses are offering free meals to current and former military personnel on November 11.
5 days ago
Emmer believed that the President had inherited a broken economy from the previous administration.
6 days ago