ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Job Seeker Exposes Troubling Questions In Application Process, Sparks Legal Concerns

In her TikTok post, Maureen shared an online form that asked intrusive questions
PUBLISHED MAR 12, 2024
Cover Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirlfab
Cover Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirlfab

Job hunting can be intimidating, but certain demands of employers can make it even more difficult. While smooth application processes, with no or minimal intrusion, encourage new applicants, the opposite often drives them away. This was seen in the case of a TikToker named McKenna Maureen (@fatgirlfab) who faced some discriminatory questions while applying for a job. She is raising awareness on the issue with her post helping her followers learn from it.

In her TikTok post, Maureen shared an online form that she claims she had to fill up as part of a job application. However, there were some troubling questions in the digital form which Maureen shared with her followers.

The first one asked the applicants how they identified themselves by generation. The question that appeared on Maureen’s screen showed that applicants had to choose from the options Gen Z, Millennial, Gen X, or Boomer. While this may not seem relevant to the application, the next question was outright racist. The totally unwanted question also had options that mentioned different ethnicities.

Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirlfab
Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirlfab

The last question that Maureen shared asked if the job seekers identified as ‘neurodivergent’. This is again discriminatory and inappropriate to ask especially to job seekers, she said.

Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirlfab
Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirlfab

All of these questions go against the rules of the U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission. The firm advises employers to not pose questions about race, religion, color, age, national origin, and more. This was pointed out by one of the viewers of the post who rightfully called the questions, “ILLEGAL”.

Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirfab
Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirfab

Meanwhile, some users suggested a way in which applicants could get back at the organization. One viewer said they would deliberately put in false information just to mess up the information collection of the firm. While another said that he would not disclose that he was a neurodivergent until the organization hired him.

Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirlfab
Image Source: TikTok | @fatgirlfab

The U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission oversees employers who practice diversity and inclusion. As an equal opportunity employer, organizations are required by law to make decisions of hiring people regardless of sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, race, ethnic origin, color, religion, national origin, citizenship, age, physical or mental disability, and all the other characteristics that are protected by law.

However, under the provisions, employers with 100 or more employees are required to file an EEO-1 report with the commission detailing the race and gender information of their employees. While this is allowed, the exercise needs to be undertaken only after the employees have been hired and the demographic information needs to be disclosed voluntarily by the employees.

As per an SHRM report, the data is collected by the commission only to monitor if an organization is engaging in unlawful employment practices. People who come across such practices can report the organizations to the U.S. Labor Department. Complainants can reach out to the authorities through the online portal or call on reach out to them by calling 1-866-487-9243.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The comedian was impressed by the simplicity of the product and amused by the pitch.
4 hours ago
Harrison usually makes smart deals on the show, but this vintage car buy turned into a costly mistake.
7 hours ago
Had she started the game in a better way, she might have won the five-figure prize money.
8 hours ago
Barbara Corcoran made the exact same offer, and she wasn't happy about being rejected.
1 day ago
The guest believed that it was worth a modest amount of money, but that was clearly not the case.
1 day ago
With James Holzhauer in the lead, Amy Schneider and Andrew He decided to joke around.
1 day ago
Barbara Corcoran told the founders that she had never seen Greiner so passionate.
1 day ago
The guest said that it was left to her by her grandmother who passed at the age of 102.
2 days ago
The host was quick to latch on to his way of speaking and made a mockery of it on TV.
2 days ago
The contestant was clearly just happy to win the chance of being on the same stage as Drew Carey.
2 days ago
The player, Thomas Russo, nearly put all of his strength into spinning the wheel.
2 days ago
Things took a turn for the better with the shark as far as the entrepreneurs were concerned.
3 days ago
The expert pointed out the intricate details on the item and said it was a personal item of the royals.
3 days ago
The expert said that if the signature was on a letterhead when Garfield was President, it would be worth more.
3 days ago
Had the contestants not gotten their gamble right, they would have lost everything they'd earned.
4 days ago
The revelation came thanks to a fan who asked the question during a "Jeopardy!" taping.
4 days ago
The entrepreneurs' decision came as a big shock to the sharks, and they did not hide it.
4 days ago
Tina double-guessed her third answer, "Does April have 31 days?" Harvey gave her the stink eye.
4 days ago
All the theatrics didn't work when sharks started scrutinizing profit margins.
4 days ago
"Can I stop at any time?" the player nervously inquired. "You can stop any time you want, yes," Carey assured.
4 days ago