ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Here's why Walmart has Agreed to pay $45 Million as Settlement to Customers

The lawsuit filed in 2022 accused Walmart of overcharging customers for certain products and misleading labeling practices.
UPDATED APR 15, 2024
Cover Image Source: A customer leaves a Walmart store in Miami, Florida | Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle
Cover Image Source: A customer leaves a Walmart store in Miami, Florida | Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle

Walmart is one of the leading retail chains across the globe, and the go to option for Americans to find daily essentials. But it has also found itself on the receiving end of complaints from consumers in the past few years, either due to pricing or new policies at its stores. In a significant development for Walmart shoppers across the nation, the retail giant has agreed to a $45 million settlement to resolve a class-action lawsuit alleging deceptive business practices. The lawsuit filed in 2022 accused Walmart of overcharging customers for certain products and misleading labeling practices, per NPR.

A Wal-Mart store sign | Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle
A Walmart store sign | Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle

According to the settlement terms, customers who purchased specified "weighted goods," such as meat, poultry, pork, and seafood products, as well as bagged citrus fruits, at Walmart stores in the U.S. and Puerto Rico between October 19, 2018, and January 19, 2024, may be eligible for cash payments.

Walmart was accused of mentioning the false weight for certain grocery items, mislabeled bagged produce, and overcharged for clearance products sold by weight. This forced the customers to pay more than the advertised price.

While Walmart has consistently denied the allegations and any wrongdoing, it opted for a settlement to avoid prolonged litigation. A spokesperson for the company reiterated this stance, stating, "We still deny the allegations; however, we believe a settlement is in the best interest of both parties."



 

The amount each customer receives from the Walmart settlement will vary depending on their eligibility and documentation. If customers have receipts, proof of purchase, or other documentation for the weighted goods or bagged citrus bought from a Walmart store during the specified period, they could receive 2% of the total cost of those items, with a maximum compensation cap of $500 per person. For those without receipts or documentation, eligibility for compensation remains possible. The amount they receive hinges on the quantity of weighted goods or bagged citrus purchased during the settlement period. This ranges from $10 for up to 50 items, to $25 for 101 or more items. To claim compensation, customers can submit their claims at walmartweightedgroceriessettlement.com or via mail by downloading the claim form or requesting a paper copy by calling the claims administrator at 1-833-987-9998.

People walk from a Walmart store | Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle
People walk from a Walmart store | Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle

Settlement payments will be distributed electronically via platforms such as Venmo, Zelle, ACH, or virtual prepaid Mastercard. Alternatively, claimants can request paper checks. However, the settlement administrator cautions that it may take several months for payments to be finalized and processed.

The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled to take place on June 12 at the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa. Pending any appeals, settlement payments will be processed after the hearing.



 

Apart from this, the retail giant settled on March 7 with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regarding a disability discrimination lawsuit. The EEOC accused Walmart of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by revoking an employee's permission to use a store electric cart as a reasonable accommodation for his disability. The employee, Luis Quiñones, who uses a prosthetic leg, was forced to take unpaid leave after Walmart claimed the electric carts were for customer use only. Despite accommodating other employees with temporary injuries, Walmart failed to provide an alternative accommodation for Quiñones, leading to his indefinite unpaid leave. As part of the settlement, Walmart will pay $70,000 in damages and offer Quiñones a job at one of its South Carolina locations.

RELATED TOPICS WALMART
MORE ON MARKET REALIST
What is Judy Sheindlin’s salary per episode? Here’s what we know about the TV judge and her new IMDb TV show, ‘Judy Justice.’
7 hours ago
Sajak was criticized by fans on the internet but the contestant clarified that it was just for fun.
8 hours ago
Danielle Perez had gone viral after talking about the awkward moment on "The Price is Right" on social media.
1 day ago
The singer also got Malone's number but is only focusing on sharing his work with him for now.
1 day ago
The incident did not bring down the woman's excitement as she kept jumping on stage.
1 day ago
The guest had no idea whose face was engraved on the top of the box and how much it cost.
2 days ago
The young entrepreneur saw a common problem kids his age faced and came up with an invention.
2 days ago
It was a gift from the father of his first client to whom he had sold a condo.
2 days ago
The singer wanted to celebrate his journey by sending fans to the place linked to his early days.
2 days ago
Wait till you hear the list of weird prizes that 'Price is Right' gave in the '50s.
3 days ago
The bottled water from the popular retailer has nanoplastic particles more than the firm's limits.
3 days ago
Most of the sharks had concerns about water pressure even though the product impressed them.
3 days ago
The host wanted to be sure about the signature that added a lot of value to the doll and the cards.
4 days ago
The incident took place on a busy Friday night and the staff failed to keep track of the group.
4 days ago
Some users also told her to just sell the car back and take cash for it instead of just paying taxes.
5 days ago
The man was initially convinced that there was a gold nugget inside the rock but he just couldn't crack it.
5 days ago
The question may not have been suggestive but fans read between the lines and interpreted it their way.
5 days ago
Sajak acknowledged that his farewell was robbing the players of time and winning opportunities.
5 days ago
The user finally decided to spend what he found on a camera and still had $500 left.
5 days ago
The guest made it clear that he intended to hold on to the precious instrument for life.
6 days ago