ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

The most valuable thing on Earth still remains a mystery to many — it costs $62 trillion for one gram

It can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
UPDATED OCT 8, 2024
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)

The rarest and most challenging materials to produce on Earth are often the most valuable. While painite and diamonds are certainly among the planet's most expensive substances, they do not hold the top spot. That title belongs to antimatter, which is valued at a staggering $62 trillion per gram.

If you have watched the 2009 Tom Hanks film "Angels and Demons" based on the Dan Brown novel of the same name, then you have come across it without realizing it. Antimatter is almost the same as normal matter only it has the opposite electric charge. 

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

In "Angels and Demons", we learned how it comes into contact with anything made of matter, it can simply explode. This is of course because two opposing forces not liking each other. Unlike normal matter, antimatter is extremely rare, which makes it ultra expensive. 

Antimatter can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which is, in part, why it is so expensive. Back in 1999, NASA scientists had predicted that it would cost $62 trillion to make one gram of antihydrogen or antimatter. A hydrogen atom consists of just one electron and one proton. This means that the simplest form of antimatter, antihydrogen, is made up of an antiproton and a positron. The first antihydrogen was made back in 1995 by CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | 	Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

As mentioned the substance is manufactured which means it cannot be found in nature.  According to UNILAD, it costs about $1 billion per year to run, with electricity costs alone running at $23.5 million per year. For the particle collision to occur to create the substance, scientists need to get up to a speed of 99.99 percent of the speed of light. This process will use a lot of power. Also to create a whole gram with this technology it will take about 100 billion years. Now, that explains why it's so very expensive. 



 

However, despite the cost, the potential applications of the antimatter have sparked intrigue among scientists. It is proposed as a fuse for interstellar space travel, offering an energy yield far superior and to any current propulsion system. Moreover, in medicine, this substance finds applications in imaging and radiation therapy.

The challenges when it comes to this substance are truly significant. Not only is the manufacturing process a mammoth task, but the handling and storage of the substance is also extremely tricky. Also, the entire quantity produced at the moment by humans is not even enough to power a lightbulb for more than a few minutes.  The antihydrogen made in CERN’s laboratory only amounted to a mass of about 1.67 nanograms. The reason why it takes so much time lies in the technology. According to Science to Go, to make antihydrogen, the required antiprotons must be made one atom at a time using a particle accelerator.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The President recently signed an order barring corporations from buying single family homes.
13 hours ago
If consumed the product could prove fatal for those with a peanut allergy.
13 hours ago
She missed out on the car by just one number, which must have been painful.
13 hours ago
Regional grocers had a fantastic performance as they took the top three spots in the rankings.
13 hours ago
They wished to remain anonymous and took some time to seek financial and legal advice.
16 hours ago
Increased consumer spending, exports, government expenditure, and investment drove the U.S. economy's 2.5% annualized growth rate.
17 hours ago
"The A was a good guess but the B or the O could be used. Q is a rare letter but not frequently used here," a fan reacted.
1 day ago
She had a good feeling about the item when she saw it but she wasn't sure of its value.
1 day ago
The overhaul comes as a direct result of the Trump administration's aggressive budget cuts.
1 day ago
She did not put a foot wrong in her performance which left fans and the cast impressed.
1 day ago
He also credited US President Donald Trump for his vision of re-industrialization with AI.
1 day ago
His comments were made in response to a Danish pensioner pulling their investment from the US.
1 day ago
This ruling reflects growing trade tensions between the US and Europe amidst the Greenland crisis.
1 day ago
She did not win much but it would have been better than going home empty-handed.
2 days ago
Brian Moynihan told Fox that a number of factors will contribute to the US GDP growth.
2 days ago
The President has a desire to take control of Greenland, threatening allies with tariffs.
2 days ago
It seems like the people of Denmark are replying to the US by using their own tactics.
2 days ago
It is part of a program running from 2017 which has seen almost $7 billion in payouts.
2 days ago