ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

The most valuable thing on Earth still remains a mystery to many — it costs $62 trillion for one gram

It can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
UPDATED OCT 8, 2024
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)

The rarest and most challenging materials to produce on Earth are often the most valuable. While painite and diamonds are certainly among the planet's most expensive substances, they do not hold the top spot. That title belongs to antimatter, which is valued at a staggering $62 trillion per gram.

If you have watched the 2009 Tom Hanks film "Angels and Demons" based on the Dan Brown novel of the same name, then you have come across it without realizing it. Antimatter is almost the same as normal matter only it has the opposite electric charge. 

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

In "Angels and Demons", we learned how it comes into contact with anything made of matter, it can simply explode. This is of course because two opposing forces not liking each other. Unlike normal matter, antimatter is extremely rare, which makes it ultra expensive. 

Antimatter can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which is, in part, why it is so expensive. Back in 1999, NASA scientists had predicted that it would cost $62 trillion to make one gram of antihydrogen or antimatter. A hydrogen atom consists of just one electron and one proton. This means that the simplest form of antimatter, antihydrogen, is made up of an antiproton and a positron. The first antihydrogen was made back in 1995 by CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | 	Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

As mentioned the substance is manufactured which means it cannot be found in nature.  According to UNILAD, it costs about $1 billion per year to run, with electricity costs alone running at $23.5 million per year. For the particle collision to occur to create the substance, scientists need to get up to a speed of 99.99 percent of the speed of light. This process will use a lot of power. Also to create a whole gram with this technology it will take about 100 billion years. Now, that explains why it's so very expensive. 



 

However, despite the cost, the potential applications of the antimatter have sparked intrigue among scientists. It is proposed as a fuse for interstellar space travel, offering an energy yield far superior and to any current propulsion system. Moreover, in medicine, this substance finds applications in imaging and radiation therapy.

The challenges when it comes to this substance are truly significant. Not only is the manufacturing process a mammoth task, but the handling and storage of the substance is also extremely tricky. Also, the entire quantity produced at the moment by humans is not even enough to power a lightbulb for more than a few minutes.  The antihydrogen made in CERN’s laboratory only amounted to a mass of about 1.67 nanograms. The reason why it takes so much time lies in the technology. According to Science to Go, to make antihydrogen, the required antiprotons must be made one atom at a time using a particle accelerator.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
He spoke about the 5% wealth tax proposed in California as a starting point.
19 hours ago
Child care costs are a major concern in Pennsylvania’s 7th District.
20 hours ago
The Shark Tank investor believes that the new Mayor would tax people into oblivion.
21 hours ago
The President's tariffs were recently adjudged illegal by the US Supreme Court.
1 day ago
“If Wendy’s wants to stay competitive, it needs mouthwatering vegan options—not another animal on the menu,” PETA president Tracy Reiman stated.
1 day ago
With a net worth of $7.1 billion, Spielberg would have shelled out an estimated $355 million in taxes if the levy were passed. 
1 day ago
"In the meantime, it's going to be very disruptive. It's going to be painful for a lot of people," he claimed.
1 day ago
Several major companies have pointed to AI as the major factor behind their workforce reductions.
2 days ago
Reports estimate workers will soon push back against losing their jobs to AI.
3 days ago
The contestant came close to winning it all, but her mistake came right at the very end.
3 days ago
The retailer has often brought back items after a long gap, and the strategy usually always works.
3 days ago
From a sales perspective, Walmart has been on top for several years thanks to high revenue.
3 days ago
He believes that only the global elite will benefit from AI's growth on almost every single front.
4 days ago
He claimed that traditional ingredients had been replaced with cheap substitutes.
4 days ago
"So, they will always point the finger at the president and say it's his fault and not take the blame," they said.
4 days ago
"All it took was a president willing to impose tariffs, willing to present manufacturers with the appropriate economic incentives," they said.
4 days ago
The contestant was feeling good about his chances but ended up with nothing.
4 days ago
Several large-scale projects will be undertaken as part of the deal.
4 days ago
Stuart Russel says companies are playing Russian Roulette with humans, and governments should step in.
4 days ago