ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

The most valuable thing on Earth still remains a mystery to many — it costs $62 trillion for one gram

It can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
UPDATED OCT 8, 2024
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)

The rarest and most challenging materials to produce on Earth are often the most valuable. While painite and diamonds are certainly among the planet's most expensive substances, they do not hold the top spot. That title belongs to antimatter, which is valued at a staggering $62 trillion per gram.

If you have watched the 2009 Tom Hanks film "Angels and Demons" based on the Dan Brown novel of the same name, then you have come across it without realizing it. Antimatter is almost the same as normal matter only it has the opposite electric charge. 

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

In "Angels and Demons", we learned how it comes into contact with anything made of matter, it can simply explode. This is of course because two opposing forces not liking each other. Unlike normal matter, antimatter is extremely rare, which makes it ultra expensive. 

Antimatter can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which is, in part, why it is so expensive. Back in 1999, NASA scientists had predicted that it would cost $62 trillion to make one gram of antihydrogen or antimatter. A hydrogen atom consists of just one electron and one proton. This means that the simplest form of antimatter, antihydrogen, is made up of an antiproton and a positron. The first antihydrogen was made back in 1995 by CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | 	Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

As mentioned the substance is manufactured which means it cannot be found in nature.  According to UNILAD, it costs about $1 billion per year to run, with electricity costs alone running at $23.5 million per year. For the particle collision to occur to create the substance, scientists need to get up to a speed of 99.99 percent of the speed of light. This process will use a lot of power. Also to create a whole gram with this technology it will take about 100 billion years. Now, that explains why it's so very expensive. 



 

However, despite the cost, the potential applications of the antimatter have sparked intrigue among scientists. It is proposed as a fuse for interstellar space travel, offering an energy yield far superior and to any current propulsion system. Moreover, in medicine, this substance finds applications in imaging and radiation therapy.

The challenges when it comes to this substance are truly significant. Not only is the manufacturing process a mammoth task, but the handling and storage of the substance is also extremely tricky. Also, the entire quantity produced at the moment by humans is not even enough to power a lightbulb for more than a few minutes.  The antihydrogen made in CERN’s laboratory only amounted to a mass of about 1.67 nanograms. The reason why it takes so much time lies in the technology. According to Science to Go, to make antihydrogen, the required antiprotons must be made one atom at a time using a particle accelerator.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Reports estimate workers will soon push back against losing their jobs to AI.
20 hours ago
The contestant came close to winning it all, but her mistake came right at the very end.
20 hours ago
The retailer has often brought back items after a long gap, and the strategy usually always works.
20 hours ago
From a sales perspective, Walmart has been on top for several years thanks to high revenue.
22 hours ago
He believes that only the global elite will benefit from AI's growth on almost every single front.
23 hours ago
He claimed that traditional ingredients had been replaced with cheap substitutes.
23 hours ago
"So, they will always point the finger at the president and say it's his fault and not take the blame," they said.
1 day ago
"All it took was a president willing to impose tariffs, willing to present manufacturers with the appropriate economic incentives," they said.
1 day ago
The contestant was feeling good about his chances but ended up with nothing.
1 day ago
Several large-scale projects will be undertaken as part of the deal.
1 day ago
Stuart Russel says companies are playing Russian Roulette with humans, and governments should step in.
1 day ago
Healthcare providers cited rising costs and denied reimbursements as the reason for the shortfalls.
1 day ago
The affected products have been recalled as the FDA conducts a full-scale investigation.
2 days ago
The customer had to fight for the product that she was willing to purchase.
2 days ago
“It’s, I think, the worst paper I’ve ever seen in the history of the Federal Reserve system," Hassett stated.
2 days ago
The case is notable as it shifts focus from content responsibility, protected under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
2 days ago
Vance has had varied opinions about the technology in the last year, some good and some bad.
2 days ago
The studio audience loved the segment as they cheered the two on whole-heartedly.
2 days ago
While Warsh compared the current situation with the internet boom, economists differ on the opinion.
2 days ago
He suggested some changes to be made to the 401(k) scheme to help Americans save more.
2 days ago