ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

The most valuable thing on Earth still remains a mystery to many — it costs $62 trillion for one gram

It can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
UPDATED OCT 8, 2024
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)

The rarest and most challenging materials to produce on Earth are often the most valuable. While painite and diamonds are certainly among the planet's most expensive substances, they do not hold the top spot. That title belongs to antimatter, which is valued at a staggering $62 trillion per gram.

If you have watched the 2009 Tom Hanks film "Angels and Demons" based on the Dan Brown novel of the same name, then you have come across it without realizing it. Antimatter is almost the same as normal matter only it has the opposite electric charge. 

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

In "Angels and Demons", we learned how it comes into contact with anything made of matter, it can simply explode. This is of course because two opposing forces not liking each other. Unlike normal matter, antimatter is extremely rare, which makes it ultra expensive. 

Antimatter can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which is, in part, why it is so expensive. Back in 1999, NASA scientists had predicted that it would cost $62 trillion to make one gram of antihydrogen or antimatter. A hydrogen atom consists of just one electron and one proton. This means that the simplest form of antimatter, antihydrogen, is made up of an antiproton and a positron. The first antihydrogen was made back in 1995 by CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | 	Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

As mentioned the substance is manufactured which means it cannot be found in nature.  According to UNILAD, it costs about $1 billion per year to run, with electricity costs alone running at $23.5 million per year. For the particle collision to occur to create the substance, scientists need to get up to a speed of 99.99 percent of the speed of light. This process will use a lot of power. Also to create a whole gram with this technology it will take about 100 billion years. Now, that explains why it's so very expensive. 



 

However, despite the cost, the potential applications of the antimatter have sparked intrigue among scientists. It is proposed as a fuse for interstellar space travel, offering an energy yield far superior and to any current propulsion system. Moreover, in medicine, this substance finds applications in imaging and radiation therapy.

The challenges when it comes to this substance are truly significant. Not only is the manufacturing process a mammoth task, but the handling and storage of the substance is also extremely tricky. Also, the entire quantity produced at the moment by humans is not even enough to power a lightbulb for more than a few minutes.  The antihydrogen made in CERN’s laboratory only amounted to a mass of about 1.67 nanograms. The reason why it takes so much time lies in the technology. According to Science to Go, to make antihydrogen, the required antiprotons must be made one atom at a time using a particle accelerator.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The President hopes to make medication cheaper, but he might not have thought it through.
2 hours ago
It seems like things are about to get a lot worse before they get better.
3 hours ago
The shopper was charged more than $80 for her items, and she might have paid that as well.
6 hours ago
The decision makes a lot of sense for the retailer in terms of morale and finances.
23 hours ago
The numbers were unexpected, and those in power will hope to make the most out of this situation.
23 hours ago
This will not be good news for Republicans ahead of the next midterm elections.
1 day ago
No one would want to eat a radioactive shrimp ahead of the holiday season.
1 day ago
The Trump administration will have its hands full if this situation truly unfolds next year.
1 day ago
With the Midterms next year, this crisis has become one of the key areas of conversation.
1 day ago
Gyms are predicted to be popular in 2026 despite the advent of at-home fitness and virtual exercises, according to 86% of Americans surveyed.
2 days ago
The host was not impressed with the question and said that it was shame that he knew the answers.
2 days ago
He was overjoyed at first but that quickly turned into bitter disappointment.
2 days ago
“Our AI-powered inventory management system is essential for supplying customers with what they need, when they need, and at the low costs," it stated.
2 days ago
 “A program that provides roughly $50 an acre will not save the thousands of family farms that will go bankrupt before the end of the year," an expert stated.
2 days ago
"This is another reason why I don’t like the Phrase category in the Bonus Round," a fan reacted.
2 days ago
The host of the show was shocked upon hearing the answer and had to speak to the contestant's wife.
2 days ago
Reports suggest these three companies with strong ties to AI can make it to the coveted club.
2 days ago
Money manager Loius Navellier thinks the U.S. GDP could grow by 5% in 2026.
2 days ago
The contestant could have comfortably won the round but it was not meant to be.
2 days ago
The retailer's low price point may be a positive but product quality still matters.
2 days ago