ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

The most valuable thing on Earth still remains a mystery to many — it costs $62 trillion for one gram

It can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
UPDATED OCT 8, 2024
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Monty Rakusen (Representative)

The rarest and most challenging materials to produce on Earth are often the most valuable. While painite and diamonds are certainly among the planet's most expensive substances, they do not hold the top spot. That title belongs to antimatter, which is valued at a staggering $62 trillion per gram.

If you have watched the 2009 Tom Hanks film "Angels and Demons" based on the Dan Brown novel of the same name, then you have come across it without realizing it. Antimatter is almost the same as normal matter only it has the opposite electric charge. 

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

In "Angels and Demons", we learned how it comes into contact with anything made of matter, it can simply explode. This is of course because two opposing forces not liking each other. Unlike normal matter, antimatter is extremely rare, which makes it ultra expensive. 

Antimatter can only be manufactured using CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which is, in part, why it is so expensive. Back in 1999, NASA scientists had predicted that it would cost $62 trillion to make one gram of antihydrogen or antimatter. A hydrogen atom consists of just one electron and one proton. This means that the simplest form of antimatter, antihydrogen, is made up of an antiproton and a positron. The first antihydrogen was made back in 1995 by CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | 	Dean Mouhtaropoulos
Image Source: CERN Lab | Getty Images | Dean Mouhtaropoulos

As mentioned the substance is manufactured which means it cannot be found in nature.  According to UNILAD, it costs about $1 billion per year to run, with electricity costs alone running at $23.5 million per year. For the particle collision to occur to create the substance, scientists need to get up to a speed of 99.99 percent of the speed of light. This process will use a lot of power. Also to create a whole gram with this technology it will take about 100 billion years. Now, that explains why it's so very expensive. 



 

However, despite the cost, the potential applications of the antimatter have sparked intrigue among scientists. It is proposed as a fuse for interstellar space travel, offering an energy yield far superior and to any current propulsion system. Moreover, in medicine, this substance finds applications in imaging and radiation therapy.

The challenges when it comes to this substance are truly significant. Not only is the manufacturing process a mammoth task, but the handling and storage of the substance is also extremely tricky. Also, the entire quantity produced at the moment by humans is not even enough to power a lightbulb for more than a few minutes.  The antihydrogen made in CERN’s laboratory only amounted to a mass of about 1.67 nanograms. The reason why it takes so much time lies in the technology. According to Science to Go, to make antihydrogen, the required antiprotons must be made one atom at a time using a particle accelerator.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
While the economy is estimated to grow in 2026, hiring may remain tepid.
2 days ago
That burden of debt on Americans might go up by the time this year comes to an end.
2 days ago
Getting gifts on Christmas is great but people don't always have to like them.
2 days ago
The retailer is adopting tech to evolve with the times and will even see new leadership.
2 days ago
The former DOGE head's claims might be optimistic at best given the American economy's state.
2 days ago
It was an incredible win and the person can hope for a happy and comfortable New Year's.
2 days ago
This will be a great option for members who make use of the mobile application.
3 days ago
Prices of essentials are still high for low and middle-income families, and job security isn't great.
3 days ago
The President hopes to make medication cheaper, but he might not have thought it through.
3 days ago
It seems like things are about to get a lot worse before they get better.
3 days ago
The shopper was charged more than $80 for her items, and she might have paid that as well.
3 days ago
The decision makes a lot of sense for the retailer in terms of morale and finances.
4 days ago
The numbers were unexpected, and those in power will hope to make the most out of this situation.
4 days ago
This will not be good news for Republicans ahead of the next midterm elections.
4 days ago
No one would want to eat a radioactive shrimp ahead of the holiday season.
4 days ago
The Trump administration will have its hands full if this situation truly unfolds next year.
5 days ago
With the Midterms next year, this crisis has become one of the key areas of conversation.
5 days ago
Gyms are predicted to be popular in 2026 despite the advent of at-home fitness and virtual exercises, according to 86% of Americans surveyed.
5 days ago
The host was not impressed with the question and said that it was shame that he knew the answers.
5 days ago
He was overjoyed at first but that quickly turned into bitter disappointment.
5 days ago