ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

LA Court Dismisses $2.6 Million Defamation Suit Against 50 Women Who Labeled Him a 'Red Flag' Online

The man claimed that the women's Facebook posts caused him "emotional distress and pain and suffering".
PUBLISHED APR 16, 2024
Cover Image Source: Pexels | Photo by Vija Rindo Pratama
Cover Image Source: Pexels | Photo by Vija Rindo Pratama

After being labeled a "red flag" by over 50 women in a Facebook group titled "Are We Dating The Same Guy," a California man, Stewart Lucas Murrey, filed a lawsuit seeking $2.6 million for defamation. The Los Angeles civil court has since dismissed the case, noting that the women had done nothing wrong by expressing their opinions about the man on their Facebook page, The New York Post reported.



 

Hailing from Santa Monica, Murrey sought damages amounting to $2.6 million for defamation and sex-based discrimination. Furthermore, he claimed that the women's Facebook posts caused him "emotional distress and pain and suffering", as per The Post.

On his GoFundMe page, Murrey claimed that at least 238 Facebook accounts were involved in "harming" him. He alleged that these individuals posted his pictures without permission, tracked his whereabouts, fabricated stories, and sensationalized their "unremarkable interactions" with him.

During a press conference last month, several of the women sued by Murrey asserted that they had done nothing wrong and were just "speaking their truth," which happened to be unfavorable to the man. In response, Murrey stated that he had never met the women who participated in the interview and that he "really saw" their faces for the first time on TV.



 

The women also created a GoFundMe page, where they emphasized their unity in "sharing truthful accounts of our personal experiences" and expressing valid concerns about the man's unsettling behavior and background. They asserted that Murrey "poses a legitimate danger to the women of Los Angeles."

In response to Murrey's claims in the lawsuit about the women tracking his whereabouts, Kelly Gibbons, one of the defendants, countered by stating that Murrey showed up at her house twice without notice.

"I never told him where I live, I never gave him my address. He went out of his way to track down where I live. It's disturbing. The second time my roommate was home and told me that somebody was knocking on the door but they didn't answer. He's holding his cellphone pointing at my house, my doors, and windows," Gibbons, 32, told DailyMail.



 

Gibbons also disclosed screenshots of conversations between her and Murrey, who purported to be a scholar on the dating platform "Hinge." She revealed that the man personally delivered the legal papers regarding the lawsuit to her, which she accepted in an attempt to halt his unannounced visits to her house.

According to DailyMail, Murrey defended his actions by claiming that he visited the defendants' residences because they had allegedly tried to evade being served with the papers. He asserted that some of them falsely claimed not to have been served, prompting him to deliver the papers in person and record video evidence of the encounters.

On the contrary, Gibbons labeled the case against her as "frivolous" and "baseless." "The case would establish a precedent and prevent him from abusing the legal system against them," said other women in the press conference. They also invoked California's anti-SLAPP laws, designed to deter meritless lawsuits.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Danielle Perez had gone viral after talking about the awkward moment on "The Price is Right" on social media.
17 hours ago
The singer also got Malone's number but is only focusing on sharing his work with him for now.
20 hours ago
The incident did not bring down the woman's excitement as she kept jumping on stage.
21 hours ago
The guest had no idea whose face was engraved on the top of the box and how much it cost.
1 day ago
The young entrepreneur saw a common problem kids his age faced and came up with an invention.
1 day ago
It was a gift from the father of his first client to whom he had sold a condo.
1 day ago
The singer wanted to celebrate his journey by sending fans to the place linked to his early days.
1 day ago
Wait till you hear the list of weird prizes that 'Price is Right' gave in the '50s.
2 days ago
The bottled water from the popular retailer has nanoplastic particles more than the firm's limits.
2 days ago
Most of the sharks had concerns about water pressure even though the product impressed them.
2 days ago
The host wanted to be sure about the signature that added a lot of value to the doll and the cards.
3 days ago
The incident took place on a busy Friday night and the staff failed to keep track of the group.
3 days ago
Some users also told her to just sell the car back and take cash for it instead of just paying taxes.
4 days ago
The man was initially convinced that there was a gold nugget inside the rock but he just couldn't crack it.
4 days ago
The question may not have been suggestive but fans read between the lines and interpreted it their way.
4 days ago
Sajak acknowledged that his farewell was robbing the players of time and winning opportunities.
4 days ago
The user finally decided to spend what he found on a camera and still had $500 left.
4 days ago
The guest made it clear that he intended to hold on to the precious instrument for life.
5 days ago
The priest could've won the game if he hadn't failed to guess answers based on Bible clues.
6 days ago
The guest's children called it ugly but she held on to it as it made her feel at peace.
7 days ago