ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Who Owns AI-Generated Content? Understanding Ownership and Copyright in the Wake of Generative AI Boom

Tracing the copyrighted content used in generating specific AI outputs is complicated and hence the numerous lawsuits against AI image generators.
PUBLISHED AUG 2, 2023
Cover Image Source: Pexels | ThisIsEngineering
Cover Image Source: Pexels | ThisIsEngineering

The rise of generative AI has sparked debates and legal challenges surrounding the ownership and copyright of AI-generated content. The question of who owns the intellectual property when AI is used to create something has become a complex issue due to uncertainties related to human involvement and training data sources.

The controversy surrounding AI-generated art came into the spotlight when an AI-generated work won an art competition. The artwork was generated by a generative AI image tool called Midjourney, following prompts from artist Jason Allen, per Euronews Next. While some praised the creativity involved in generating the right prompts for the AI, others expressed fear that AI could replace human creativity in the art field. Additionally, the win raised questions about copyright ownership as the AI tool played a significant role in creating the final artwork.

Cover Image Source: Pexels | Tara Winstead
Image Source: Tara Winstead/Pexels 

Legal action and copyright infringement

Some creators and companies believe their content has been stolen by generative AI companies and are now filing lawsuits against them. Getty Images (an American visual media company and supplier of stock images, editorial photography, video, and music for businesses and consumers) is suing Stability AI (the company behind Stable Diffusion) for copying and processing millions of images that are protected by copyright without getting permission or providing compensation, per Built In. Voice actress Bev Standing claimed that TikTok used her voice without permission for its text-to-speech feature and filed a lawsuit against the company. Artists like Sarah Anderson, Kelly McKernan and Karla Ortiz have filed a class-action copyright infringement lawsuit against both Stability AI and Midjourney, claiming that these companies have used their images to train their AI models. Author and comedian Sarah Silverman along with two other authors are pressing similar charges against OpenAI and Meta.

Image Source: cottonbro studio/Pexels
Image Source: cottonbro studio/Pexels

Copyrighting AI-generated content presents various challenges due to the novelty of the technology and its unique characteristics. A recent study explained that existing laws are often applied to new technologies based on court cases and the same is expected for AI-generated content. The history of photography provides a potential guide on how copyright laws might evolve as photographers eventually gain ownership rights over their creations, leading to the establishment of photography as a recognized artform.

Source: GettyImages | Leon Neal  Staff (2)
Image Source:  Leon Neal Staff (2)/Getty Images

EU copyright rules for AI-generated content

The EU has been playing catch-up in terms of regulating AI use and specific laws for copyrighting AI-generated content are yet to be established. However, the AI Act passed by the European Parliament addresses the need for companies deploying AI-generated content to disclose any copyrighted material used in their systems. This is a step in the right direction as copyright challenges often arise due to the possibility of copyrighted material being used to train AI models.

Several challenges make it difficult to copyright AI-generated content. One of the primary issues is the ambiguity surrounding human involvement and intentions in the creative process. Additionally, the training data used to develop AI models often includes copyrighted works without the creators' knowledge or consent. This raises questions about whether the resulting AI-generated content constitutes fair use or requires compensation for the original artists.

Image Source: Getty Image | Andrea Verdelli  Stringer
Image Source: Andrea Verdelli Stringer/Getty Image

Determining ownership and joint copyrights

Tracing the copyrighted content used in generating specific AI outputs is complicated and hence, the numerous lawsuits against AI image generators. Moreover, determining the extent of human involvement required for ownership of AI-generated content remains challenging. As copyright laws aim to protect artists and encourage creativity, lawmakers may need to consider joint ownership in cases where AI-generated content resembles existing works closely.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
It wasn't an ordinary ring but the 2004 Patriots Super Bowl Ring, which Harrison refused to let go.
10 hours ago
Harvey was in disbelief after he misheard what Ming-Na Wen's teammate said.
10 hours ago
Harvey could feel the pain as he collected the answers from the contestants.
12 hours ago
The owner of Harry Karstens' First Ascent Denali Ice Axe was shocked to learn how valuable it was.
1 day ago
As model Rachel Reynolds slammed on the brakes, fellow presenter Alexis Gaube nearly fell over.
1 day ago
Harvey couldn't believe his eyes when an answer did not show up on the board.
2 days ago
The winner, Trish yelled "This cannot be happening!" as she sat in her new car.
2 days ago
Harvey was shocked to see some of the answers show up on the board.
2 days ago
The seemingly tough puzzle cost contestant, Kelly Amodio a brand new Mini Cooper.
2 days ago
The contestant, Jodi Hope took home $75,000, using her puzzle solving skills.
2 days ago
The guest had to promise on camera to share the profits with her friend who gifted the item.
3 days ago
Harvey just couldn't seem to understand what Giuliana Rancic's mother was saying.
3 days ago
Harvey had to take a moment to school the contestant on how the game is played.
3 days ago
It seemed like Veronica forgot she was holding the host's hand after the win.
3 days ago
The owner of the Jean-Michel Basquiat Oil Stick Painting made it clear that it wasn't going anywhere
3 days ago
The player, Jason Warren missed out on taking home more than $86,000.
3 days ago
The TikTok creator @thebiteo87 stirred a debate on social media by exposing the new tactic.
4 days ago
Harvey couldn't believe what the NFLPA stars would choose for their wives to wear
4 days ago
Harvey barely held on to the podium after hearing the answers that shook him.
4 days ago