ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Labor Department Redefines Employee vs Independent Contractor Classification; All You Need To Know

The DOL's new rule is expected to make it challenging for employers to classify workers as independent contractors, potentially leading to more workers being classified as employees eligible for benefits.
PUBLISHED APR 3, 2024
Cover Image Source: The exterior of the U.S. Department of Labor | Getty Images | Photo by Alex Wong
Cover Image Source: The exterior of the U.S. Department of Labor | Getty Images | Photo by Alex Wong

In January, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) instituted new rules for classifying individuals as employees or independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The rule, which went into effect on March 11, revised the DOL’s previous guidance on the classification of workers by adopting a six-factor test. Keep reading to know more!

Representative Image | Unsplash | Photo by Kemal Kozbaev
Image Source: Representative Image | Unsplash | Photo by Kemal Kozbaev

Origin of the Independent Contractor Rule

The Trump-era DOL issued the Independent Contractor Status for consistency in entities covered by the FLSA in 2021. The Prior Rule encompassed a five-factor economic realities test, and it identified two core factors: "the nature and degree of the individual’s control over the work" and "the individual’s opportunity for profit or loss," according to the National Law Review.



 

The Prior Rule was slated to go into effect on March 8, 2021, but after the Biden Administration took office, the DOL published a new independent contractor rule on March 4, 2021, delaying the Trump-era rule.

On May 6, 2021, the DOL published a new rule attempting to repeal the Prior Rule. However, it met with litigation and in 2022 a Texas federal court reinstated the Prior Rule.

The Introduction of the Final Rule

After obtaining feedback from relevant stakeholders, the Final Rule was formally enacted in October 2022, rescinding and substituting the Prior Rule. In place of the "core factors," the Final Rule implemented a distinct analysis approach.



 

The Final Rule introduced by the Department of Labor (DOL) outlines six factors that guide the analysis of a worker's relationship with an employer:

1. Scope and opportunity for profit or loss: This factor assesses the worker's ability to negotiate pay, accept or decline jobs, and other functions affecting potential profit or loss.

2. Investments by the employer and the workers: It considers whether the worker has made significant capital or entrepreneurial investments that enable them to work for multiple companies, thus indicating independent contractor status.

3. Permanency of the working relationship: This factor suggests that if a worker is hired for a fixed period, project-based work, or sporadically, they may be classified as an independent contractor.

4. Nature and degree of control over the work: This factor examines whether the worker controls their schedule, is unsupervised, and is not explicitly restricted from working for other entities, indicating independent contractor status.

5. Nature of the work and its integration with the employer's business: If the work performed by the worker is integral to the employer's business, they may not be classified as an independent contractor.

6. Worker's skill and initiative: If the worker brings specialized skills used for marketing or acquiring business from other entities, they may be classified as an independent contractor.



 

Impact on Employers

The DOL's new rule is expected to make it challenging for employers to classify workers as independent contractors, potentially leading to more workers being classified as employees eligible for benefits. However, it also increases the risk of employee misclassification, exposing employers to liability for failing to provide the required benefits and protections.

Penalties

Employers found to have misclassified workers may face penalties under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including fines of up to $10,000 and potential criminal prosecution.

Legal challenges to the Final Rule are pending in federal courts in Tennessee, Louisiana, and Georgia. Republican Senators have introduced a Congressional Review Act to repeal the Final Rule and reinstate the Prior Rule.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
John considers himself the very best on the show when it comes to licensing deals.
2 hours ago
Fans of the show found the joke tasteless and they let their feelings be known.
3 hours ago
The host was stunned upon hearing the answer and had to ask the contestant about her logic behind it.
4 hours ago
Mr. Wonderful had said no the first time, but promptly came back after learning about the royalty.
7 hours ago
Steve Harvey had a hard time believing the contestant's answer, but she was outdone by her teammate.
1 day ago
The duo worked very well as a team and the victory was well-deserved.
1 day ago
Mr. Wonderful was passionate about bats right from the get-go and was the only one to make an offer.
1 day ago
The pawn shop owner made a deal with the seller that he'd pay more if the gun worked.
2 days ago
Amber Lancaster handled the situation gracefully, and even congratulated the player on his impressive win.
2 days ago
The contestant, Diane, gave a couple of cheeky answers that caught Steve Harvey off guard.
3 days ago
The guest was expecting $22,000 for a Led Zeppelin album that was signed by all four members.
3 days ago
Fans shared their excitement for the upcoming season, with many hoping to see another million-dollar winner.
3 days ago
The host noted that contestant was already a crowd favorite, and his kind gesture made Josh feel like a star.
3 days ago
The item’s uniqueness kept Rick Harrison from making an offer, as there was no reference point for its value.
4 days ago
The entrepreneur 's business was immensely profitable which made her a confident negotiator.
4 days ago
The host did not hold back on his roast, but the contestant took it all in good humor.
4 days ago
The company made sure that pets were well-dressed and taken care of on the owner's wedding day.
5 days ago
The player, Leslie, decided to trust her gut instead of listening to the audience,and it really paid off.
5 days ago
The company had more than $18 million in sales in just the 12 months ahead of taping.
5 days ago
The pawn shop owner did not expect the grinder to be worth so much money.
6 days ago