ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Teenager tries to explain ‘girl math’ to dad in hilarious video and the Starbucks one is so on point

"Once the money leaves my bank it doesn’t exist anymore"
PUBLISHED AUG 25, 2024
Cover Image Source: Pexels |  Karolina Kaboompics
Cover Image Source: Pexels | Karolina Kaboompics

Girl Math, a term used to describe the unique ways in which girls justify their spending habits, has taken the internet by storm. A fresh video on TikTok features a girl trying to explain to her dad what the term means after all. 

Marley Brown, (@thebobmarleyy) onTikTok, posted her four-part video series explaining the cultural phenomenon to her father. In the the first video, she says, "If I buy concert tickets for two people, and those people pay me back, the money they pay me back for is free." She says that as the money had already left her account the money that she then gets from her friends will be considered as "free" as it had already bid her farewell in the first place.

TikTok | @
TikTok | @thebobmarleyy

Her father immediately starts shaking his head in disagreement and says that she is simply using the money twice. Brown then says that according to this logic, returning an item and receiving the money back also makes the returned money "free money."

Each video in the series showed Brown going through a list of rules. The third video really resonated with many as it got more than 11 million views. In the video, she says, "If something’s less than $5, it’s free,” before her father responds. "No. What if you buy a hundred things that are $4?"

Anna | TikTok
Anna | TikTok

"They’re all for free," Brown responds, to which her dad quickly says, "No. It’s $400, which is obviously not free." Brown explains that using money in her Starbucks app to buy a drink, which customers can do by transferring money from their bank account to the Starbucks app, means that it’s actually a no-cost beverage. “If I want to get Starbucks and there’s already money in the account, money in the app, it’s free," she says. 

@romywhatever | TikTok
@romywhatever | TikTok

Her father then points out how she has already loaned them money. She then talks about how these rules also apply to online shopping, adding that when a company offers free shipping for items more than $10, it makes sense to purchase additional items in order to qualify for the free shipping.

"If the shipping is $4, I should spend the $10 because it’s a better investment," Brown tells her dad, to which he simply says: "No."

Many took to the video to talk about the conversation. "Yess once the money leaves my bank it doesn’t exist anymore," writes one user while another writes, "yeees, because I'm buying those tickets with the expectation that I'm not going to see that money again. like, I know I can count on my friends." 

We've all come up with creative justifications for unnecessary purchases, but this particular trend is relatively new. While it may seem amusing, it's more of a financial joke than a serious budgeting strategy. If you're struggling with budgeting, it's best to avoid this trend. 

For more such videos follow, (@marleyvbrown) on TikTok.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
He spoke about the 5% wealth tax proposed in California as a starting point.
2 hours ago
Child care costs are a major concern in Pennsylvania’s 7th District.
3 hours ago
The Shark Tank investor believes that the new Mayor would tax people into oblivion.
4 hours ago
The President's tariffs were recently adjudged illegal by the US Supreme Court.
7 hours ago
“If Wendy’s wants to stay competitive, it needs mouthwatering vegan options—not another animal on the menu,” PETA president Tracy Reiman stated.
8 hours ago
With a net worth of $7.1 billion, Spielberg would have shelled out an estimated $355 million in taxes if the levy were passed. 
8 hours ago
"In the meantime, it's going to be very disruptive. It's going to be painful for a lot of people," he claimed.
10 hours ago
Several major companies have pointed to AI as the major factor behind their workforce reductions.
2 days ago
Reports estimate workers will soon push back against losing their jobs to AI.
3 days ago
The contestant came close to winning it all, but her mistake came right at the very end.
3 days ago
The retailer has often brought back items after a long gap, and the strategy usually always works.
3 days ago
From a sales perspective, Walmart has been on top for several years thanks to high revenue.
3 days ago
He believes that only the global elite will benefit from AI's growth on almost every single front.
3 days ago
He claimed that traditional ingredients had been replaced with cheap substitutes.
3 days ago
"So, they will always point the finger at the president and say it's his fault and not take the blame," they said.
3 days ago
"All it took was a president willing to impose tariffs, willing to present manufacturers with the appropriate economic incentives," they said.
3 days ago
The contestant was feeling good about his chances but ended up with nothing.
4 days ago
Several large-scale projects will be undertaken as part of the deal.
4 days ago
Stuart Russel says companies are playing Russian Roulette with humans, and governments should step in.
4 days ago