ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

'Shark Tank' contestants bring an Olympic gold medalist to win a massive deal with two judges

They were asking for a massive $20 million valuation, which put a lot of the sharks off at first.
PUBLISHED JUN 3, 2025
Screenshots showing the gold medalist with one of the founders (L) and the sharks discussing their offer (Cover image source: YouTube | Shark Tank)
Screenshots showing the gold medalist with one of the founders (L) and the sharks discussing their offer (Cover image source: YouTube | Shark Tank)

Celebrity endorsements are often used by brands to woo customers, and entrepreneurs on “Shark Tank” don't shy away from using those to their advantage. When founders on the show wanted to justify a $20 million valuation of their firm, they roped in an Olympic gold medalist for their pitch. Anthony Kjenstad and Lauren Campbell asked for $500,000 for 2.5% of their company, Firefly Recovery, and were accompanied by professional beach volleyball player Kerri Walsh Jennings.

The company’s product was a small band that can be attached to the legs to help the body pump more blood, in order to support recovery after an intense workout session or sporting event. The product was a lot more portable than other products available for the same purpose at the time. The three-time Olympic gold medalist Kerri Walsh Jennings was brought in as a loyal customer of the brand, and she gave her two cents on the product.



 

“When I’m training and trying to be the best in the world and win gold medals, I would use them and I would notice my legs are lighter. I’m fresher,” she said. The sharks were impressed by the product, but the problem was valuation. A $20 million valuation is massive, and no shark wanted to pay half a million dollars for only a 2.5% stake in a company. Kevin O’Leary flat-out said no as he did not believe it was worth it.

Daymond John was also concerned about the valuation, and his lack of knowledge and experience in the fitness industry at the time also prompted him to back out. Mark Cuban simply believed that the product was too expensive. Paying $48 per month for recovery did not seem like a feasible price. However, despite the high price, the company had made $7.5 million in lifetime sales and $4 million the past year at the time of recording.

Screenshot showing the entrepreneurs pitching their product on
Screenshot showing the entrepreneurs pitching their product on "Shark Tank." (Image source: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)

While Cuban was adamant about his point about the price, Lori Greiner defended the company and soon made a joint offer alongside guest shark Rashaun Williams. Williams had been in the fitness industry for quite a while and had the necessary experience and expertise to make the company go big. Greiner, too, had her connections in the retail industry that would make the product more accessible to the masses.

However, what the entrepreneurs were offering was too low. Instead, the sharks offered $500,000 for a 5% stake in the company with a $1.5 per unit royalty until the money was paid back and a 50-cent royalty in perpetuity. This was a decent offer, but the entrepreneurs did not want to make a royalty deal and played hardball with the sharks. They said that they would do the deal with no royalty and for a 3.5% stake.



 

This, again, was too little for two sharks to bite. They did away with the royalty bid but would not budge from the 5% stake they had asked for. The entrepreneurs did not have much of a choice at that point and accepted the terms.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
She did her best but her choice of letters was not good enough.
14 hours ago
Shoppers are urged to be wary of the product and throw them away if purchased.
15 hours ago
Despite their point of difference, both masters of trivia have a lot of respect for one another.
15 hours ago
The product in question contained peanuts, a known allergen, and was mislabeled.
18 hours ago
In an interview, Pichai stated that organizations will need to work through the disruption.
20 hours ago
The money from the donation will go to millions of children and will help them be financially secure.
21 hours ago
Kiyosaki urged people to invest in precious metals and cryptocurrency to be prepared.
1 day ago
She's not made a lot of public appearances since her mammoth win on the show.
1 day ago
Despite the cancellation of its contract, Musk believes that DOGE was on the right track.
1 day ago
Hundreds of shoppers waited in line overnight in the cold, only to be left utterly disappointed.
1 day ago
Speaking to CNN, Yang talked about how AI will impact communities and what could be the solution
1 day ago
The move has been hailed by those who already own houses, but those who do not will be in trouble.
1 day ago
Many believe that the cost of a college degree is a debt they'd want to bear for years to come.
2 days ago
Tim Wu, a Columbia Law School professor, says companies are trying to find power over people.
2 days ago
These young Americans are often condemned for their trading habits, but there is logic to it.
2 days ago
This adds another chapter to the seemingly endless product recalls this year has seen so far.
2 days ago
The new format added an element of unpredictability, which might not have been present earlier.
2 days ago
There was no official announcement or statement by the company about the move.
5 days ago
He also cautioned that investors are ill-prepared for the challenges that lie ahead as the AI cycle enters a "more dangerous phase."
5 days ago
The price point of these passes may come as a surprise to some as prices of necessities are rising.
5 days ago