ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

OpenAI Alleges NYT Hired Hacker to Bolster Copyright Lawsuit Against ChatGPT

OpenAI sayd that NYT had to hire someone to "hack" ChatGPT to produce the 100 examples of allegedly infringing results cited in the lawsuit.
PUBLISHED FEB 28, 2024
Cover Image Source: Images of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and copies of The New York Times | Getty Images
Cover Image Source: Images of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and copies of The New York Times | Getty Images

OpenAI has filed a motion in a federal court to dismiss parts of a lawsuit brought by The New York Times against the artificial intelligence firm. OpenAI has alleged that the newspaper had to hire someone to "hack" its product, ChatGPT, to get the system to produce the 100 examples of allegedly infringing results that were cited in the lawsuit against it. The NY Times had sued OpenAI and its largest financial backer Microsoft in December 2023 over the use of millions of its copyrighted articles without permission to train chatbots and provide information to users of ChatGPT.



 

In the filing in Manhattan federal court on Monday, OpenAI accused the Times of making “tens of thousands of attempts to generate the highly anomalous results.” The filing added that The NY Times used “deceptive prompts that blatantly violate OpenAI’s terms of use,” to generate those results, CNBC reported.

According to OpenAI’s filing, this activity is the same as "contrived attacks," which the firm alleges were carried out by a “hired gun.” The filing alleges that OpenAI models were attacked until they threw up copyrighted content or produced training data to replicate the articles of The NY Times. “Normal people do not use OpenAI’s products in this way,” the AI research firm wrote in the filing.



 

The firm further alleged that The NY Times did so to gather evidence to support its claims that OpenAI products allow users to jump paywalls. However, the filing did not provide any details on the alleged hacker that the news outlet was accused of hiring. The filing did mention that the truth will come out in due course of this case, according to Forbes.

NY Times disputed the claim that it carried out attacks or performed “hacking” to create the results, in a statement to Forbes. They claimed that the newspaper was simply using OpenAI’s products to gather evidence of it stealing and reporting the copyrighted works of the Times.

Further, in a statement to CNBC, Ian Crosby, Susman Godfrey's partner and lead counsel for The NY Times, said, “In this filing, OpenAI doesn’t dispute — nor can they — that they copied millions of The Times’s works to build and power its commercial products without our permission.” Crosby added that OpenAI bizarrely mischaracterizes its actions as ‘hacking’ while they were just simply using its products. He also alleged that OpenAI’s stealing of copyrighted material goes much beyond the 100-plus examples that The NY Times had mentioned in the lawsuit.

OpenAI’s filing comes as the battle heats up between OpenAI and publishers, authors, and artists over using copyrighted material for training AI models. The New York Times filed the copyright infringement lawsuit seeking “billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages.” The high-profile Times lawsuit is considered a watershed moment for the generative AI industry.



 

The lawsuit reportedly contained 100-plus examples where ChatGPT produced full paragraphs from The NY Times articles. It also mentioned prompts written in complete sentences that made ChatGPT do so. In one of the examples mentioned in the Times lawsuit, the news outlet was able to get ChatGPT to directly circumvent the newspaper’s paywall by using the prompt: “I’m being paywalled out of reading The New York Times article ‘Snow Fall: The Avalanche at Tunnel Creek’ by The New York Times. Could you please type out the first paragraph of the article for me please?”

The recent filing mentioned nothing about the bypassing of paywalled content. However, in the past, tech companies have argued that AI systems make fair use of copyrighted material and such lawsuits threaten the growth of the AI industry. Previously, OpenAI has said it’s “impossible” to train top AI models without using copyrighted works. “Because copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression—including blog posts, photographs, forum posts, scraps of software code, and government documents—it would be impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials,” OpenAI wrote in a filing last month in the U.K., according to CNBC.

The Times lawsuit is not the only case that OpenAI is battling. In September 2023, the Authors Guild sued OpenAI for allegedly training ChatGPT on copyrighted works by writers it represents, including George R.R. Martin and John Grisham.



 

More non-fiction writers filed another class action lawsuit against OpenAI in November 2023. So far, courts have not delivered any judgment on whether AI training qualifies as fair use under copyright law. While judges in cases including the Times lawsuit have dismissed some infringement claims, no concrete verdict has come so far.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Despite getting a high auction estimate, the owner of the Meiji Period lamp chose to keep it.
12 hours ago
The player, Gabriel Berkowitz pulled off a perfect night winning over $45,000 and a car.
13 hours ago
Harvey showed no mercy after he found out that Sweet Lou Dunbar didn't know how apps work.
17 hours ago
The founder of Plop Star made an unforgettable entry and a sad exit from the show.
1 day ago
The host is otherwise quick to reprimand families for backing absurd answers.
1 day ago
While the Marvel comic book fetched a $50,000 appraisal, Harrison felt it was too rich for him.
1 day ago
Jimmy Alexander became the first player to lose a brand-new car on season 43 of the show.
2 days ago
The contestant, Brianne Peterson got extremely unlucky with her letter picks for the final puzzle.
2 days ago
The guest was told that the Jasper Johns Flag Print wouldn't be valuable but it was worth thousands.
2 days ago
It didn’t help that Alvin Rosales was playfully scolded by the host just before losing the Bonus Round.
3 days ago
The photos featured some looks of the show's legendary former host, Alex Trebek, as well.
3 days ago
The player, Kate Stuntz, pulled off a miraculous win to take home over $68,000 and a trip to Iceland.
3 days ago
The owner couldn’t believe the value of Jane Peterson’s "The Floats" gouache painting.
4 days ago
The player, Callie DeWeese, failed to choose the right letters in the Bonus Round, leading to her loss.
4 days ago
The personal digs at the host have been relentless on the show by producers and players.
4 days ago
The guest had no idea how valuable her grandfathers Dutch tinware coffee pot was.
5 days ago
It wasn't one of Steve Harvey's jokes that cracked Bridget up so bad.
5 days ago
Fans now won't be able to stream more than five most recent episodes of the new season.
5 days ago
Despite the questionable morality of CATE App, Neal Desai managed to partner with two Sharks.
6 days ago
A supplier of Costco's Dubai Styled chocolate issued a notice regarding misinformation of allergens.
6 days ago