ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Texas Judge Orders Lawyers To Attest They Haven't Used ChatGPT For Case Briefs

The judge cited the inherent limitations and risks associated with current generative AI platforms, such as hallucinations, bias, and unreliable outputs.
UPDATED JUN 6, 2023
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Leon Neal
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Leon Neal

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought forth numerous innovations, transforming various industries. However, its integration into the legal profession has raised concerns about the potential risks and limitations associated with AI-generated content.

Recently, US District Judge Brantley Starr of the Northern District of Texas issued a groundbreaking order requiring attorneys to attest that they will not use generative AI technology, such as ChatGPT, to draft legal briefs.

Image Source: Getty Images | Pool
Image Source: Getty Images | Pool

Judge's Order and Reasoning

Judge Starr's order was prompted by a case in which a lawyer employed ChatGPT to prepare a legal brief. Upon examination, the brief was found to contain errors and even fabricated court cases. The judge acknowledged the usefulness of AI in certain legal aspects, such as generating standard documents or suggesting errors in existing content.

However, he emphasized that legal briefing should not be entrusted solely to generative AI due to its propensity to hallucinate or invent facts. In his ban, Judge Starr cited the inherent limitations and risks associated with current generative AI platforms, such as hallucinations, bias, and unreliable outputs.

"These platforms in their current states are prone to hallucinations and bias. On hallucinations, they make stuff up — even quotes and citations," Judget Starr wrote in his order.

Image Source: Getty Images | Chris McGrath  Staff
Image Source: Getty Images | Chris McGrath Staff

AI's Role in the Legal Profession

Although the judge imposed limitations on the use of generative AI in legal briefs, he recognized its potential benefits in other areas of the legal profession. AI tools can streamline processes by assisting in tasks like form divorces, discovery requests, and identifying potential questions for oral arguments. By automating these routine tasks, attorneys can allocate more time to strategic thinking, case analysis, and client interaction. Moreover, AI-powered tools can enhance legal research by providing access to vast databases of legal precedents and statutes, expediting the process of finding relevant information.

Potential Risks and Limitations of Generative AI

Image Source: Getty Image | Andrea Verdelli  Stringer
Image Source: Getty Image | Andrea Verdelli Stringer

Generative AI, while impressive, is still an evolving technology and comes with limitations and risks. One major concern is the possibility of incorrect answers or information generated by AI models like ChatGPT. Due to the evolving nature of these models, they can make factual, grammatical, and reasoning errors. Users must exercise caution and independently verify the accuracy of AI-generated content.

Additionally, biases can be introduced through AI models, as they are trained on data that may exhibit inherent biases. This raises concerns about perpetuating cultural, racial, and gender stigmas.

The Case of the Lawyer and the AI-Generated Brief

The incident involving the lawyer and the AI-generated brief illustrates the potential pitfalls of relying solely on generative AI for legal content creation. Fabricated court cases and inaccuracies undermine the integrity of the legal system and can adversely affect the outcome of a case. This serves as a reminder that human oversight and critical analysis remain essential in the legal profession, ensuring accuracy, integrity, and ethical representation.

Image Source: Getty Image | Pool Pool
Image Source: Getty Image | Pool Pool

Sworn Attestation Requirement

Judge Starr's requirement for attorneys to file a sworn attestation regarding the use of generative AI in their filings serves as a safeguard against the potential misuse or misrepresentation of AI-generated content. By ensuring that either no portion of the document was generated by AI or that a human has verified the AI-generated text, the judge aims to uphold the principles of truth, accountability, and professionalism within the legal profession.



 

A Lot of Companies in the US Have Embraced AI Chatbots

According to a survey by ResumeBuilder.com, it was found that 49% of companies in the United States are currently using ChatGPT, with an additional 30% planning to adopt the technology in the near future. The survey highlights the growing popularity of ChatGPT among businesses, with a significant number of companies already reaping its benefits. The data indicates a positive trend, as 93% of current users express their intention to expand their use of ChatGPT. This suggests that AI chatbots are increasingly becoming a valuable tool for various industries in the US.

Image Source: Getty Images | Lintao Zhang  Staff
Image Source: Getty Images | Lintao Zhang Staff
MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Dwyane 'the Rock' Johnson said that his friend's actions changed the course of his life.
54 minutes ago
The Texas inventor pitched a generator named after him on the third season of Shark Tank.
16 hours ago
Despite putting the contestant in an awkward position the host did get the audience to laugh.
23 hours ago
Although fans have admired his energy on the episode for years, Paul revealed why he wasn't too happy.
1 day ago
It took more than a decade and an amazing invention for Les Cookson to secure a deal on Shark Tank.
1 day ago
The contestant was also defended by some who said they would've made the same mistake.
1 day ago
While the item received a record-breaking appraisal, a flaw prevented its value from going higher.
2 days ago
She has starred in classic films such as "Sixteen Candles", "The Lost Boys", and "Twister".
2 days ago
What is Judy Sheindlin’s salary per episode? Here’s what we know about the TV judge and her new IMDb TV show, ‘Judy Justice.’
3 days ago
Sajak was criticized by fans on the internet but the contestant clarified that it was just for fun.
3 days ago
Danielle Perez had gone viral after talking about the awkward moment on "The Price is Right" on social media.
3 days ago
The singer also got Malone's number but is only focusing on sharing his work with him for now.
4 days ago
The incident did not bring down the woman's excitement as she kept jumping on stage.
4 days ago
The guest had no idea whose face was engraved on the top of the box and how much it cost.
4 days ago
The young entrepreneur saw a common problem kids his age faced and came up with an invention.
5 days ago
It was a gift from the father of his first client to whom he had sold a condo.
5 days ago
The singer wanted to celebrate his journey by sending fans to the place linked to his early days.
5 days ago
Wait till you hear the list of weird prizes that 'Price is Right' gave in the '50s.
6 days ago
The bottled water from the popular retailer has nanoplastic particles more than the firm's limits.
6 days ago
Most of the sharks had concerns about water pressure even though the product impressed them.
6 days ago