ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Here’s How AI Chatbots ‘Hallucinate’ And Why It Is Dangerous For Users

Turns out, AI chatbots are also capable of hallucinating and they do so by making up false information in response to a user’s prompt.
PUBLISHED DEC 29, 2023
Cover Image Source: Pexels | Photo by cottonbro studio
Cover Image Source: Pexels | Photo by cottonbro studio

The word “hallucination” is commonly associated with people hearing sounds and seeing things that no one else seems to hear or see. However, since the advancement of AI chatbots, the world has taken a different stand. Turns out, AI chatbots are also capable of hallucinating and they do so by making up false information in response to a user’s prompt. Further, “hallucinate” in the AI sense, is Dictionary.com’s word of the year as it best represents the potential impact that AI may have on “the future of language and life.”



 

An AI hallucination occurs when a large language model (LLM) generates false information. LLMs are AI models that power the commonly known chatbots like ChatGPT and Google Bard.

Photo illustration of the welcome screen for the OpenAI
Photo illustration of the welcome screen for the OpenAI "ChatGPT" app | Getty Images | Photo by Leon Neal

An AI chatbot hallucinates when users provide a prompt that is either made up or about something that the LLMs have no understanding of. In this case, the LLMs use statistics to generate false information in language that is grammatically correct and within the context of the prompt. Thus, the information appears plausible but it necessarily isn’t true. Sometimes AI hallucinations appear to be nonsensical but it is often hard to differentiate between true information and a hallucination.

One infamous example of an AI hallucination mentioned in a TechTarget report involved Google's chatbot, Bard. When the chatbot was prompted “What discoveries from the James Webb Space Telescope can I tell my 9-year-old about?" Bard responded with an untrue claim that the James Webb Space Telescope was the first to take pictures of an exoplanet outside this solar system. However, in reality, the first images of an exoplanet were taken in 2004 according to NASA, and it was not the James Webb Space Telescope as it was launched in 2021.



 

Despite that, Bard's answer sounded plausible and was consistent with the prompt. This poses a risk to users as someone who is not looking at the information with a skeptical eye may believe that the chatbot’s reply is true.

Photo illustration of the OpenAI ChatGPT's  answer to the question
Photo illustration of the OpenAI ChatGPT's answer to the question "What can AI offer to humanity?" | Getty Images | Photo by Leon Neal

There is no clear way to determine the exact causes of AI hallucinations on a case-by-case basis. Further, an immediate risk that AI hallucinations pose is that they significantly hurt user trust. With the development of advanced chatbots, users begin to experience AI as more real and develop more inherent trust. However, false information given out in hallucinations can corrode that trust leaving users with the feeling of betrayal.

Another problem with AI hallucinations is the lack of awareness of the problem. Users can be fooled with false information and this can even be used to spread misinformation, fabricate citations and references, and even be weaponized in cyberattacks. Another challenge is mitigating the AI hallucinations as it can be difficult or in many cases impossible to determine why the LLM generated the specific hallucination. Further, there are limited ways to fix these hallucinations as going into the model to change the training data can use a lot of energy.

Both OpenAI and Google have warned users about the mistakes that their AI chatbots can make. The firms have advised users to double-check their responses.

Image of Person's hand holding an iPhone using the Google Bard generative AI language model (chatbot) | Getty Images | Photo by Smith Collection
Image of Person's hand holding an iPhone using the Google Bard generative AI language model (chatbot) | Getty Images | Photo by Smith Collection

Tech organizations are also working on ways to reduce hallucination, as per a CNBC report. Google handles hallucinations through user feedback. When Bard generates an inaccurate response, users are encouraged to click the thumbs-down button and describe why the answer was wrong to help the chatbot improve. Further, OpenAI has implemented a strategy called “process supervision” in which the AI model rewards itself for using proper reasoning to arrive at an output instead of just rewarding the system for generating a correct response to a prompt.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The guest kept his grandparents' antique instruments under his bed for years.
2 minutes ago
Harris wasn't the only one who came up with an answer that shocked everyone.
1 hour ago
Despite getting a high auction estimate, the owner of the Meiji Period lamp chose to keep it.
20 hours ago
The player, Gabriel Berkowitz pulled off a perfect night winning over $45,000 and a car.
21 hours ago
Harvey showed no mercy after he found out that Sweet Lou Dunbar didn't know how apps work.
1 day ago
The founder of Plop Star made an unforgettable entry and a sad exit from the show.
1 day ago
The host is otherwise quick to reprimand families for backing absurd answers.
1 day ago
While the Marvel comic book fetched a $50,000 appraisal, Harrison felt it was too rich for him.
2 days ago
Jimmy Alexander became the first player to lose a brand-new car on season 43 of the show.
2 days ago
The contestant, Brianne Peterson got extremely unlucky with her letter picks for the final puzzle.
3 days ago
The guest was told that the Jasper Johns Flag Print wouldn't be valuable but it was worth thousands.
3 days ago
It didn’t help that Alvin Rosales was playfully scolded by the host just before losing the Bonus Round.
3 days ago
The photos featured some looks of the show's legendary former host, Alex Trebek, as well.
3 days ago
The player, Kate Stuntz, pulled off a miraculous win to take home over $68,000 and a trip to Iceland.
3 days ago
The owner couldn’t believe the value of Jane Peterson’s "The Floats" gouache painting.
4 days ago
The player, Callie DeWeese, failed to choose the right letters in the Bonus Round, leading to her loss.
4 days ago
The personal digs at the host have been relentless on the show by producers and players.
4 days ago
The guest had no idea how valuable her grandfathers Dutch tinware coffee pot was.
5 days ago
It wasn't one of Steve Harvey's jokes that cracked Bridget up so bad.
5 days ago
Fans now won't be able to stream more than five most recent episodes of the new season.
6 days ago