ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Now, AI-Backed Scams Are Targeting News Editors with Elaborate Copyright Threats

Scammers are looking to dupe news editors into providing links for their bogus websites.
PUBLISHED DEC 20, 2023
Cover Image Soure: Pexels | Photo by Rodrigo Santos
Cover Image Soure: Pexels | Photo by Rodrigo Santos

The advent of generative artificial intelligence has opened multiple avenues of innovation. While AI has now become a creator of content, it also serves as an optimal tool for data analysis. With this, it is no surprise that AI-backed scams have also emerged to rob unsuspecting victims on the internet. A recent AI-backed scam is looking to dupe news editors into providing links for their bogus websites within their content.



 

The deputy editor for Cointelegraph's Asia-Pacific news desk based in Sydney recently alleged that an alleged law firm emailed a “DMCA Copyright Infringement Notice”, claiming that an article of the publication had used a copyrighted stock image owned by a vague cryptocurrency firm.

However, the image was not even present in the mentioned article. Yet, the alleged law firm hit the editor with another email claiming to be working on behalf of a different AI-backed crypto platform.

The threat was demanding that Cointelegraph link the content to the alleged owner’s website. A person named “Alicia Weber,” a purported employee for “Nationwide Legal Services,” issued the threat and gave the editor five days to provide a link or else she would file a copyright lawsuit.

Image source: Pexels
Image source: Pexels

The scammer further claimed that removing the image would not rectify the issue and demanded the editor to include a link to the “notable entity” and “prominent organization” mentioned by her.

The editor mentioned that the website of the law firm has a .site instead of a .com extension, which is a clear red flag. The editor also noticed that the headshots of the so-called lawyers on the firm’s website looked like they were generated by AI or were deep fakes. Also, the corporate headshots of the vague crypto firm's “dream team” had AI-generated hallmarks and glossed-over eyes.



 

Meanwhile, the second fake firm named in the email had mentioned on its website’s team page “Our AI Generated Cyborg Team.” Both of the websites contained a huge amount of AI-generated content to make them look authentic.

Unsuspecting editors, who are too busy to crosscheck, may easily provide backlinks to these websites thinking they are genuine publishers and to stave off a potential lawsuit. Thus, it is important to conduct thorough research before accepting any demand coming from a dubious email.

However, the editor claimed that the two websites did not have any other scams running. Even signing up with an email on the website did nothing for the editor.

The scam mentioned in the Cointelegraph report shows similarities to the lazier phishing scams that operated on X (formerly Twitter). In those scams, automated AI bots posted links to Google forms to collect seed phrases.

Another example of an AI-backed scam is an investment scam where scammers are presenting fake investment opportunities backed by AI-generated data to lure unsuspecting investors into putting their money in fraudulent schemes.



 

While there have been useful chatbots like Chat-GPT, BARD, and more, dubious AI-powered chatbots are also used by scammers to disguise as genuine service providers and gather personal information, sensitive financial information or even convince unsuspecting victims to transfer money into their accounts.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The painting had been with the guest for 30 years, and she was curious about it.
3 hours ago
It was hard for Harvey to digest what he was hearing from the senior players.
4 hours ago
The best friends, Hanna Chung and Laura Tarpley, got tricked by just one word in the end.
1 day ago
The player, Shannon Hunt got the host excited before missing the puzzle by a few letters.
1 day ago
The founder of Hairfin managed to make it through the heckling to get a deal.
1 day ago
The player, Jeff Richardson put up a stunning performance to drive home a new car.
2 days ago
Since Kevin O'Leary made the offer just to mess with Corcoran, the deal hit the Shark where it hurts.
2 days ago
Harrison chose to pass on the most important item of the collection for a strange reason.
2 days ago
The contestant, Alexa Kalanz was doing well throughout the game despite a rough start.
2 days ago
Despite having just 25% ownership of her company, Meagan Bowman managed to bag a $400,000 deal.
3 days ago
In the end, Harrison felt like he hit the jackpot as he knew every collector would be after the item.
3 days ago
Former players and audience members shared how the show deals with controversial statements.
4 days ago
Fans were divided on whether Adam Wredberg's Bonus Round puzzle was solvable or not.
4 days ago
The lucky win delighted the fans as the contestant, Sunita Baru took home more than $50,000.
5 days ago
Chris and Jeanie Rodgers didn't just beat up the zombie on the show, but also had him present their product to the judges.
5 days ago
Fans on Reddit complained complained that some games are either overly difficult by design or favor only physically fit contestants.
5 days ago
Contestant Joey Sweet took the loss in stride, but the show's viewers weren't happy with the puzzle selection.
6 days ago
A lot of things on set were put to the test during the "Is it real or is it cake?" challenge, including the host.
6 days ago
Fans were left disappointed after the contestant, Alicia Slagle, failed to guess an easy phrase in the finale.
6 days ago