ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

'Shark Tank' founders were called 'greedy' on the show — then they got a 6-figure deal from four judges

It's not every day that a business finds four big investors from "Shark Tank" on its side.
PUBLISHED MAR 27, 2025
Screenshots showing the entrepreneurs and the sharks on "Shark Tank" (Cover image source: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)
Screenshots showing the entrepreneurs and the sharks on "Shark Tank" (Cover image source: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)

The common belief is that greed isn't good, and entrepreneurs who have asked for too much money have also received some sharp words from “Shark Tank” investors. It's very rare for people to get four sharks on board on the show, and that happens only after a lot of scrutiny and negotiations. But all those odds didn't stop Ellen Hodges and Omayya Atout, founders of Songlorious, from asking for a whopping $400,000 for a 10% stake in the company. They even sang a song for the judges, which was hilarious.



 

Songlorious specializes in personalized gifts but not material objects like flowers or cards. Instead, the company has a massive roster of freelance musicians who can write a song for a customer who intends to gift it to a loved one. The customer base isn’t restricted to individuals either. The songs can be used in weddings and corporate setups, and this was intriguing for the sharks.

Screenshot showing the entreprenuers perform a song for the sharks on
Screenshot showing the entreprenuers perform a song for the sharks on "Shark Tank" (Image source: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)

Another reason why they were all excited is the company's numbers. At the time of recording, the founders claimed that they had made $700,000 the year before and $1.1 million year to that point. They even claimed to have two companies as their customers who were frequently asking for new songs to be made every time an employee got a promotion.

Impressed by this, the first shark to get a taste was British investor Peter Jones. He said, “In the UK, I owned a company called Red Letter Days. Basically, it was an experienced company. You could buy a recording for whatever you wanted…very similar. We sold it, and we made a lot of money." Jones then claimed that he would be the perfect partner for Songlorious given his experience and his international reach but asked for a third of the business for $400,000.

Screenshot showing Peter Jones on
Screenshot showing Peter Jones on "Shark Tank" (Image source: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)

Daymond John, who also has a good connection with the music industry, made an offer of the same money for 20% of the business. While all of this was going on, Kevin O’Leary got up from his chair and spoke to Mark Cuban. O’Leary was intrigued from the moment he heard about having customers in the wedding industry. Cuban, on the other hand, knew more about technology.

Screenshot showing Mark Cuban and Kevin O'Leary having a conversation. (Image credit: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)
Screenshot showing Mark Cuban and Kevin O'Leary having a conversation. (Image source: YouTube | Sony Pictures Television)

Cuban's firm Synthesia, which specializes in making AI music, can take the voice of anyone and emulate it into the vocals of a full-length song with proper production. O’Leary loved the technology side of things and wanted to partner with Cuban. They offered $400,000 for 25% of the business. However, Mr. Wonderful was also interested in Jones’s access to an international market.

The three of them teamed up to offer the money for a third of the business, but Daymond John would not be left out. He came on board in the end, and the final offer was $500,000 for 40% of the business, split equally among four sharks. The entrepreneurs needed a moment to discuss and came back with a counter. They wanted $800,000 for the same share of the business.



 

This was too much money, and Jones made it clear. He said, “I think you might be too greedy now. I think you’ve got a good deal at $500,000 for four at 40%.” In the end, it was Mr. Wonderful who brilliantly sold the offer. “If you give us the 40%, we will blow this thing up, and your competitors will be in the dust,” he said. That was all the reassurance that the entrepreneurs needed to close the deal.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
A new report suggests the investment led growth had made the rich richer and put pressure on workers
15 hours ago
The low-middle class of the country is feeling the crippling pressure of the affordability crisis
15 hours ago
Thankfully, no illness or injury has been reported yet because of the foreign objects.
16 hours ago
The OpenAI boss believes that it is impossible to scale such a model at this moment.
16 hours ago
He asked Americans to forget about the stimulus checks until the tariffs issue is dealt with.
18 hours ago
The technology will see millions out of jobs, cutting their spending power by a huge margin.
18 hours ago
He spoke about the 5% wealth tax proposed in California as a starting point.
1 day ago
Child care costs are a major concern in Pennsylvania’s 7th District.
1 day ago
The Shark Tank investor believes that the new Mayor would tax people into oblivion.
1 day ago
The President's tariffs were recently adjudged illegal by the US Supreme Court.
1 day ago
“If Wendy’s wants to stay competitive, it needs mouthwatering vegan options—not another animal on the menu,” PETA president Tracy Reiman stated.
1 day ago
With a net worth of $7.1 billion, Spielberg would have shelled out an estimated $355 million in taxes if the levy were passed. 
1 day ago
"In the meantime, it's going to be very disruptive. It's going to be painful for a lot of people," he claimed.
1 day ago
Several major companies have pointed to AI as the major factor behind their workforce reductions.
3 days ago
Reports estimate workers will soon push back against losing their jobs to AI.
4 days ago
The contestant came close to winning it all, but her mistake came right at the very end.
4 days ago
The retailer has often brought back items after a long gap, and the strategy usually always works.
4 days ago
From a sales perspective, Walmart has been on top for several years thanks to high revenue.
4 days ago
He believes that only the global elite will benefit from AI's growth on almost every single front.
4 days ago