ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Texas Judge Orders Lawyers To Attest They Haven't Used ChatGPT For Case Briefs

The judge cited the inherent limitations and risks associated with current generative AI platforms, such as hallucinations, bias, and unreliable outputs.
UPDATED JUN 6, 2023
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Leon Neal
Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Leon Neal

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought forth numerous innovations, transforming various industries. However, its integration into the legal profession has raised concerns about the potential risks and limitations associated with AI-generated content.

Recently, US District Judge Brantley Starr of the Northern District of Texas issued a groundbreaking order requiring attorneys to attest that they will not use generative AI technology, such as ChatGPT, to draft legal briefs.

Image Source: Getty Images | Pool
Image Source: Getty Images | Pool

Judge's Order and Reasoning

Judge Starr's order was prompted by a case in which a lawyer employed ChatGPT to prepare a legal brief. Upon examination, the brief was found to contain errors and even fabricated court cases. The judge acknowledged the usefulness of AI in certain legal aspects, such as generating standard documents or suggesting errors in existing content.

However, he emphasized that legal briefing should not be entrusted solely to generative AI due to its propensity to hallucinate or invent facts. In his ban, Judge Starr cited the inherent limitations and risks associated with current generative AI platforms, such as hallucinations, bias, and unreliable outputs.

"These platforms in their current states are prone to hallucinations and bias. On hallucinations, they make stuff up — even quotes and citations," Judget Starr wrote in his order.

Image Source: Getty Images | Chris McGrath  Staff
Image Source: Getty Images | Chris McGrath Staff

AI's Role in the Legal Profession

Although the judge imposed limitations on the use of generative AI in legal briefs, he recognized its potential benefits in other areas of the legal profession. AI tools can streamline processes by assisting in tasks like form divorces, discovery requests, and identifying potential questions for oral arguments. By automating these routine tasks, attorneys can allocate more time to strategic thinking, case analysis, and client interaction. Moreover, AI-powered tools can enhance legal research by providing access to vast databases of legal precedents and statutes, expediting the process of finding relevant information.

Potential Risks and Limitations of Generative AI

Image Source: Getty Image | Andrea Verdelli  Stringer
Image Source: Getty Image | Andrea Verdelli Stringer

Generative AI, while impressive, is still an evolving technology and comes with limitations and risks. One major concern is the possibility of incorrect answers or information generated by AI models like ChatGPT. Due to the evolving nature of these models, they can make factual, grammatical, and reasoning errors. Users must exercise caution and independently verify the accuracy of AI-generated content.

Additionally, biases can be introduced through AI models, as they are trained on data that may exhibit inherent biases. This raises concerns about perpetuating cultural, racial, and gender stigmas.

The Case of the Lawyer and the AI-Generated Brief

The incident involving the lawyer and the AI-generated brief illustrates the potential pitfalls of relying solely on generative AI for legal content creation. Fabricated court cases and inaccuracies undermine the integrity of the legal system and can adversely affect the outcome of a case. This serves as a reminder that human oversight and critical analysis remain essential in the legal profession, ensuring accuracy, integrity, and ethical representation.

Image Source: Getty Image | Pool Pool
Image Source: Getty Image | Pool Pool

Sworn Attestation Requirement

Judge Starr's requirement for attorneys to file a sworn attestation regarding the use of generative AI in their filings serves as a safeguard against the potential misuse or misrepresentation of AI-generated content. By ensuring that either no portion of the document was generated by AI or that a human has verified the AI-generated text, the judge aims to uphold the principles of truth, accountability, and professionalism within the legal profession.



 

A Lot of Companies in the US Have Embraced AI Chatbots

According to a survey by ResumeBuilder.com, it was found that 49% of companies in the United States are currently using ChatGPT, with an additional 30% planning to adopt the technology in the near future. The survey highlights the growing popularity of ChatGPT among businesses, with a significant number of companies already reaping its benefits. The data indicates a positive trend, as 93% of current users express their intention to expand their use of ChatGPT. This suggests that AI chatbots are increasingly becoming a valuable tool for various industries in the US.

Image Source: Getty Images | Lintao Zhang  Staff
Image Source: Getty Images | Lintao Zhang Staff
MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The painting set a record on the show for being one of the most expensive pieces of art.
11 hours ago
The cups were made thousands of years back and so regulations were not an issue as per the expert.
13 hours ago
The founders of Surprise Ride had a deal but they failed to close it on time.
15 hours ago
Harrison got his hands on one of the most sought-after pieces of American history for $1.45 million.
1 day ago
The popular TikTok creator claimed the food product was one of the worst the store offers.
1 day ago
Harrison wasn't willing to part with it but sold it to UFC boss Data White.
2 days ago
The entrepreneurs who followed Greiner's book to scale their business got the ultimate reward.
2 days ago
The watch was something that the expert himself hadn't seen in his career.
2 days ago
The Season 3 champion, W. Kamau Bell, is looking to become a regular part of the game show.
3 days ago
Harvey was excited to hear the answers as soon as he read the question.
3 days ago
When the show's guitar expert, Jesse Amoroso, cut the item's value by 75% from the asking price, the guest lost his cool.
4 days ago
Fans argued that the show misattributed the song "Life Is A Highway" to another composer.
4 days ago
Jennings opened up about keeping "Jeopardy!" the way it was when he was a fan.
4 days ago
Harvey also mocked the player for an answer that earned his team a second strike.
4 days ago
When she did find out how precious the painting from her mother was, she could hardly speak.
4 days ago
The concern among shoppers is growing after a document suggesting the policy change leaked.
5 days ago
The item was unique since there was only one more of the kind in the world.
5 days ago
Apart from being the trivia expert, Jennings has other talents up his sleeve as well.
5 days ago
The guest had no idea that the beloved artifact was a Japanese Bronze Sculpture from Kaneda Kenjiro.
5 days ago
The guest was merely expecting to get double of what she had paid for the book.
5 days ago