ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Supreme Court Rules Against Race-Based College Admissions; What It Means

The decisions stem from lawsuits against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina and have sparked debates on diversity in higher education.
UPDATED JAN 22, 2024
Cover Image Source: GettyImages | Mark Wilson  Staff
Cover Image Source: GettyImages | Mark Wilson Staff

The Supreme Court recently banned the use of race in college admissions, overturning a long-standing precedent and potentially impacting the enrollment of Black and Hispanic students in elite schools. The decisions, stemming from lawsuits against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, have sparked debates on affirmative action, diversity in higher education and the future of college admissions.



 

In a 237-page opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court's conservative majority, stating that the admissions programs of Harvard and UNC employ race in a negative manner and cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause, per CBS News. Roberts was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The rulings signal a shift away from race-based admissions policies and emphasize the importance of an individual's character and unique abilities rather than the color of their skin in the admissions process.

“Many universities have for too long wrongly concluded that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned, but the color of their skin,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the said opinion. 

Source: GettyImages | Chip Somodevilla  Staff
Source: GettyImages | Chip Somodevilla Staff

The Supreme Court rulings are expected to have significant implications for Black and Hispanic students seeking admission to elite schools. With the removal of race as a factor in admissions decisions, these students may face greater challenges in gaining access to higher education institutions. The rulings come at a time when the country is grappling with the effects of systemic racism and when colleges and universities are striving to expand access for underrepresented students.

Source: GettyImages | Brandon Bell  Staff
Source: GettyImages | Brandon Bell Staff

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the majority opinions. Sotomayor argues that the court's decision "rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress"  and cements a superficial rule of colorblindness in an endemically segregated society.  Jackson highlights the systemic racism ingrained in American history and criticizes the majority's detachment from the country's actual past and present experiences. These dissenting opinions shed light on the concerns surrounding the elimination of race-conscious admissions policies.

Source: GettyImages | Kevin Dietsch  Staff
Source: GettyImages | Kevin Dietsch Staff

The lawsuits against Harvard and UNC were filed by Students for Fair Admissions, an advocacy group opposing race-based admissions policies. The group argued that these policies discriminate against Asian American applicants. Harvard and UNC defended their use of race as one of several factors in admission decisions, emphasizing the importance of maintaining diversity on their campuses.

Source: GettyImages | Chip Somodevilla  Staff
Source: GettyImages | Chip Somodevilla Staff

The Debate on Diversity in Higher Education 

The rulings have reignited the ongoing debate on diversity in higher education. Supporters of affirmative action argue that considering race as a factor in admissions helps address historic inequities and promotes diversity. They emphasize the importance of holistic admissions policies that take into account a range of factors beyond test scores and grades. Critics of affirmative action contend that race-conscious policies can lead to discrimination against certain racial or ethnic groups. They advocate for race-neutral approaches that consider socioeconomic status and other factors to achieve diversity.



 

The Supreme Court rulings raise questions about the future of college admissions and how institutions will ensure diversity on their campuses. In response to the decisions, President Joe Biden says, "I very strongly condemn it." He called on colleges and universities to continue using measures of diversity and adversity in their admissions processes. Recommendations for the future include considering applicants' financial backgrounds and hardships they have faced (including racial discrimination) and expanding outreach efforts to underrepresented communities. Additionally, exploring race-neutral factors that promote diversity, such as socioeconomic status and geographic diversity can help universities maintain inclusive and equitable student bodies. 

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The FSIS announced at least five people were injured from consumption of the affected products.
7 hours ago
In the end, the guest was ready to fight her sister for an item worth thousands of dollars.
9 hours ago
Fans were heartbroken to see the player, Ryan, walk away empty handed.
10 hours ago
Harvey couldn't believe the hard researched facts about catfish on the show.
11 hours ago
Carey demanded the Wikipedia page of "Stack the Deck" game to be updated after the win.
13 hours ago
The player Titus Stevens missed out on taking home nearly $65,000 over an easy puzzle.
1 day ago
Harvey couldn't control himself after hearing some of the answers.
1 day ago
The thrift store find turned out to be quite profitable for the seller named Kimberly.
2 days ago
The creator showed proof that the store jacked up the price of an item by $3 during a sale.
3 days ago
The contestant, Linda Rivera failed to crack a seemingly easy phrase in the finale.
3 days ago
Fans couldn't believe that the player chose to miss out on such a good opportunity.
3 days ago
Host Drew Carey had to point out how loud the viewers were before the emotional victory.
4 days ago
While the guest got a massive appraisal for her grandma's ring, she was clear on her stand.
4 days ago
While some blamed the tough puzzle, a few were disappointed with the player, Rob Schwandt.
4 days ago
The player was a bit too excited for the trip and so was her husband in the audience.
5 days ago
The player, Ashton Hildebrand when on to win the showcase for prizes worth over $52,000.
5 days ago
The guest, Jad managed to bring a deal back from the dead and get exactly the amount he asked for.
5 days ago
While some players played it safe, others destroyed their marriages on the show.
5 days ago
Harvey was sure tha the player, Darren didn't want to be on the show at all.
6 days ago