ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

American States Swing Into Action to Regulate AI as it Plays a Bigger Role in Crucial Decisions

Amidst limited regulations, legislators embark on a complex journey to balance the benefits and risks of AI, focusing on discrimination concerns.
PUBLISHED MAR 9, 2024
Unsplash | Photo by Igor Omilaev
Unsplash | Photo by Igor Omilaev

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has taken the world by storm in the past couple of years with the rise of ChatGPT and its rivals, as these tools are playing an increasingly decisive role in everyday decisions for businesses. But the pervasive nature of AI in various aspects of life raises concerns about discrimination, oversight, and a lack of regulations. To address this, lawmakers are now proposing legislation to regulate bias in AI.

ChatGPT Plus (AI) | Pexels | Photo by Andrew Neel
ChatGPT Plus (AI) | Pexels | Photo by Andrew Neel

Suresh Venkatasubramanian, a co-author of the White House's Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights and a professor at Brown University, emphasizes the pervasive influence of AI on people's lives. Despite its widespread integration, many AI systems have been found to exhibit biases, favoring specific races, genders, or income groups. The lack of effective regulation has spurred state-level initiatives to address these concerns.

The success or failure of these legislative efforts hinges on lawmakers navigating complex problems while engaging with an industry valued in the hundreds of billions of dollars and growing exponentially. Out of over 400 AI-related bills under consideration this year, only a fraction passed into law in the previous year.

The bills introduced last year and those currently under consideration primarily target specific aspects of AI regulation. Approximately 200 bills are aimed at addressing deepfakes, including proposals to ban explicit deepfakes that plague social media platforms. Additionally, efforts are being made to control chatbots, like ChatGPT, to prevent them from providing instructions for harmful activities.

Experts studying AI's discriminatory tendencies contend that states are already behind in establishing necessary guardrails. The bills specifically focus on AI's role in major decisions through "automated decision tools," which have become prevalent yet remain mostly hidden from public view.

Man Working with AI | Pexels | Photo by Matheus Bertelli
Man Working with AI | Pexels | Photo by Matheus Bertelli

Studies estimate that up to 83% of employers, including 99% of Fortune 500 companies, employ algorithms in the hiring process. However, the majority of Americans are unaware of these tools and their potential biases. AI systems can learn bias from historical data, and this issue extends to pivotal decisions, such as hiring and rental applications, potentially leading to discriminatory outcomes.

Several bills target the lack of transparency and accountability in AI decision-making. Bills aim to make it mandatory for companies using automated decision tools to conduct "impact assessments." These assessments would include details on how AI contributes to decisions, the data collected, a discrimination risk analysis, and an explanation of the company's safeguards. Some bills further propose informing customers about AI usage in decision-making, allowing them to opt out with certain conditions.

Craig Albright, senior vice president of U.S. government relations at BSA, the industry lobbying group, notes that industry members generally support certain proposed measures, such as impact assessments.

Despite initial legislative efforts, progress has been modest, with some bills already facing challenges. A bill in Washington state has stalled in committee, and a California proposal from 2023 met a similar fate.

As lawmakers and voters grapple with the ever-growing influence of AI, experts emphasize the need for comprehensive and transparent impact assessments to identify and rectify biases. While the legislative proposals mark a positive step, the conversation continues, urging a balance between innovation, oversight, and accountability in the realm of artificial intelligence.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The FSIS announced at least five people were injured from consumption of the affected products.
15 hours ago
In the end, the guest was ready to fight her sister for an item worth thousands of dollars.
17 hours ago
Fans were heartbroken to see the player, Ryan, walk away empty handed.
18 hours ago
Harvey couldn't believe the hard researched facts about catfish on the show.
19 hours ago
Carey demanded the Wikipedia page of "Stack the Deck" game to be updated after the win.
21 hours ago
The player Titus Stevens missed out on taking home nearly $65,000 over an easy puzzle.
1 day ago
Harvey couldn't control himself after hearing some of the answers.
1 day ago
The thrift store find turned out to be quite profitable for the seller named Kimberly.
2 days ago
The creator showed proof that the store jacked up the price of an item by $3 during a sale.
3 days ago
The contestant, Linda Rivera failed to crack a seemingly easy phrase in the finale.
3 days ago
Fans couldn't believe that the player chose to miss out on such a good opportunity.
3 days ago
Host Drew Carey had to point out how loud the viewers were before the emotional victory.
4 days ago
While the guest got a massive appraisal for her grandma's ring, she was clear on her stand.
4 days ago
While some blamed the tough puzzle, a few were disappointed with the player, Rob Schwandt.
4 days ago
The player was a bit too excited for the trip and so was her husband in the audience.
5 days ago
The player, Ashton Hildebrand when on to win the showcase for prizes worth over $52,000.
5 days ago
The guest, Jad managed to bring a deal back from the dead and get exactly the amount he asked for.
5 days ago
While some players played it safe, others destroyed their marriages on the show.
5 days ago
Harvey was sure tha the player, Darren didn't want to be on the show at all.
6 days ago