ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

Your old Harry Potter book could be worth $100,000 — just look out for these printing mistakes

Small details such as the identity of the author and the date when it was printed need to be checked.
PUBLISHED NOV 22, 2024
Harry Potter Fans at the Toys "R" Us Times Square midnight launch of "Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows" on July 21, 2007 in New York City. (Image Source: Photo by Jason Kempin/FilmMagic/ Getty Images)
Harry Potter Fans at the Toys "R" Us Times Square midnight launch of "Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows" on July 21, 2007 in New York City. (Image Source: Photo by Jason Kempin/FilmMagic/ Getty Images)

Literature is a treasure trove of knowledge and culture in itself, but vintage books and even old comics have emerged as precious collectors' items. "Harry Potter" is one of the most iconic series of books with characters who became pop culture icons in the past couple of decades. That's why it isn't surprising that the first edition of the fantasy fiction book is worth a fortune today. Yes, the first book published in June 1997, has now become a highly sought-after treasure, because only 500 hardcover copies were printed for it. Most of these copies then went to libraries and only around 200 are said to be owned by collectors in mint condition.

An art handler holds the book displaying Original Cover Art for
An art handler holds the book displaying Original Cover Art for "Harry Potter" | (Image Source: Getty Images | Alexi Rosenfeld)

Now, these initial copies have become precious with prices soaring past $100,000 at various auctions. One book was sold for an astronomical  $471,000, showing how books we carried around as kids could someday become a rarity. To identify an early edition, you need to look for indicators such as the author's name appearing as "Joanne Rowling" instead of "J.K Rowling," that we now know her as. There's also a notable misprint on page 53 where "1 wand" is listed twice in the equipment list. The initial edition of the book also signifies the beginning of an iconic literary journey for J.K. Rowling. Most of these original copies of the book were delivered to various libraries where they may have been handled roughly, which makes those that collectors held on to even more precious. 



 

The first print was bound in two different ways, the rarest is the hardback issue with a cover of laminated boards. Also, the publisher must be listed as Bloomsbury at the bottom of the title page. Make sure that the date listed in the copyright information is 1997 and the print line on the copyright page must read “10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1”, from ten down to one. The lowest figure in the print line indicates the edition. (For instance, if your copy has “20 19 18 17”, it’s a less valuable seventeenth print.)

Hanson's Associate Director of Books Jim Spencer spoke to Yahoo News and talked about the qualities that make a book a collectible. "I get hundreds of emails every day from people who think they've found a first edition Harry Potter and want to know how much it's worth. But a lot of them end up disappointed. A genuine first edition of JK Rowling's first book, Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, in good condition, is very scarce," he said. 



 

"A lot of people think they've got a first edition, but technically they aren't. Only 500 first-edition hardback copies of the first book were published and 300 went to schools. So they ended up getting read and passed around a lot and I've seen some that a practically falling apart. A genuine first edition in good edition is very rare and if it was signed by JK Rowling in 1997 at the time of publication it could be worth £100,000," he added.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
It didn’t help that Alvin Rosales was playfully scolded by the host just before losing the Bonus Round.
48 minutes ago
The photos featured some looks of the show's legendary former host, Alex Trebek, as well.
1 hour ago
The player, Kate Stuntz, pulled off a miraculous win to take home over $68,000 and a trip to Iceland.
4 hours ago
The owner couldn’t believe the value of Jane Peterson’s "The Floats" gouache painting.
1 day ago
The player, Callie DeWeese, failed to choose the right letters in the Bonus Round, leading to her loss.
1 day ago
The personal digs at the host have been relentless on the show by producers and players.
1 day ago
The guest had no idea how valuable her grandfathers Dutch tinware coffee pot was.
2 days ago
It wasn't one of Steve Harvey's jokes that cracked Bridget up so bad.
2 days ago
Fans now won't be able to stream more than five most recent episodes of the new season.
2 days ago
Despite the questionable morality of CATE App, Neal Desai managed to partner with two Sharks.
3 days ago
A supplier of Costco's Dubai Styled chocolate issued a notice regarding misinformation of allergens.
3 days ago
While some felt the puzzle was easy, many agreed that the player's letter picks let her down.
3 days ago
Harvey couldn't believe that a contestant mentioned John Madden as a response to the question.
4 days ago
The host was impressed with the contestant, John Boese's puzzle solving skills.
4 days ago
Despite making a decent offer, Harrison could not make a deal for the rare Mormon Bank Dollar.
4 days ago
The player, Lisa Santangelo, was dumbfounded by a puzzle that was allegedly reused by the show.
5 days ago
The player, Brittany Brock was visibly shaken after the big $40,000 win in the Bonus Round.
5 days ago
Steve Harvey was thoroughly entertained by the plans some of the contestants had for their final hour on Earth.
5 days ago
Costco's executive membership costs $130 annually, and with it, you can enter the store up to an hour earlier on most days.
6 days ago
Not only the contestants, but the audience also took a dig at the host with their survey responses.
6 days ago