ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

LA Court Dismisses $2.6 Million Defamation Suit Against 50 Women Who Labeled Him a 'Red Flag' Online

The man claimed that the women's Facebook posts caused him "emotional distress and pain and suffering".
PUBLISHED APR 16, 2024
Cover Image Source: Pexels | Photo by Vija Rindo Pratama
Cover Image Source: Pexels | Photo by Vija Rindo Pratama

After being labeled a "red flag" by over 50 women in a Facebook group titled "Are We Dating The Same Guy," a California man, Stewart Lucas Murrey, filed a lawsuit seeking $2.6 million for defamation. The Los Angeles civil court has since dismissed the case, noting that the women had done nothing wrong by expressing their opinions about the man on their Facebook page, The New York Post reported.



 

Hailing from Santa Monica, Murrey sought damages amounting to $2.6 million for defamation and sex-based discrimination. Furthermore, he claimed that the women's Facebook posts caused him "emotional distress and pain and suffering", as per The Post.

On his GoFundMe page, Murrey claimed that at least 238 Facebook accounts were involved in "harming" him. He alleged that these individuals posted his pictures without permission, tracked his whereabouts, fabricated stories, and sensationalized their "unremarkable interactions" with him.

During a press conference last month, several of the women sued by Murrey asserted that they had done nothing wrong and were just "speaking their truth," which happened to be unfavorable to the man. In response, Murrey stated that he had never met the women who participated in the interview and that he "really saw" their faces for the first time on TV.



 

The women also created a GoFundMe page, where they emphasized their unity in "sharing truthful accounts of our personal experiences" and expressing valid concerns about the man's unsettling behavior and background. They asserted that Murrey "poses a legitimate danger to the women of Los Angeles."

In response to Murrey's claims in the lawsuit about the women tracking his whereabouts, Kelly Gibbons, one of the defendants, countered by stating that Murrey showed up at her house twice without notice.

"I never told him where I live, I never gave him my address. He went out of his way to track down where I live. It's disturbing. The second time my roommate was home and told me that somebody was knocking on the door but they didn't answer. He's holding his cellphone pointing at my house, my doors, and windows," Gibbons, 32, told DailyMail.



 

Gibbons also disclosed screenshots of conversations between her and Murrey, who purported to be a scholar on the dating platform "Hinge." She revealed that the man personally delivered the legal papers regarding the lawsuit to her, which she accepted in an attempt to halt his unannounced visits to her house.

According to DailyMail, Murrey defended his actions by claiming that he visited the defendants' residences because they had allegedly tried to evade being served with the papers. He asserted that some of them falsely claimed not to have been served, prompting him to deliver the papers in person and record video evidence of the encounters.

On the contrary, Gibbons labeled the case against her as "frivolous" and "baseless." "The case would establish a precedent and prevent him from abusing the legal system against them," said other women in the press conference. They also invoked California's anti-SLAPP laws, designed to deter meritless lawsuits.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The owner of the collection of Danny Lyon SNCC Civil Rights Posters was left astonished in the end.
16 hours ago
After Harrison bought a signed speed bag for $250, he happened to meet the star at a dinner.
19 hours ago
The contestant, Doug, had a hard time coming up with a sensible answer.
22 hours ago
While Jennings performed a half-baked trick, it still managed to thoroughly entertain the fans.
1 day ago
The player, Andy Schwartz registered the first loss of a car since Seacrest took over as host.
1 day ago
The guest kept his grandparents' antique instruments under his bed for years.
1 day ago
Harris wasn't the only one who came up with an answer that shocked everyone.
1 day ago
Despite getting a high auction estimate, the owner of the Meiji Period lamp chose to keep it.
2 days ago
The player, Gabriel Berkowitz pulled off a perfect night winning over $45,000 and a car.
2 days ago
Harvey showed no mercy after he found out that Sweet Lou Dunbar didn't know how apps work.
2 days ago
The founder of Plop Star made an unforgettable entry and a sad exit from the show.
3 days ago
The host is otherwise quick to reprimand families for backing absurd answers.
3 days ago
While the Marvel comic book fetched a $50,000 appraisal, Harrison felt it was too rich for him.
3 days ago
Jimmy Alexander became the first player to lose a brand-new car on season 43 of the show.
4 days ago
The contestant, Brianne Peterson got extremely unlucky with her letter picks for the final puzzle.
4 days ago
The guest was told that the Jasper Johns Flag Print wouldn't be valuable but it was worth thousands.
4 days ago
It didn’t help that Alvin Rosales was playfully scolded by the host just before losing the Bonus Round.
5 days ago
The photos featured some looks of the show's legendary former host, Alex Trebek, as well.
5 days ago
The player, Kate Stuntz, pulled off a miraculous win to take home over $68,000 and a trip to Iceland.
5 days ago
The owner couldn’t believe the value of Jane Peterson’s "The Floats" gouache painting.
6 days ago