ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

LA Court Dismisses $2.6 Million Defamation Suit Against 50 Women Who Labeled Him a 'Red Flag' Online

The man claimed that the women's Facebook posts caused him "emotional distress and pain and suffering".
PUBLISHED APR 16, 2024
Cover Image Source: Pexels | Photo by Vija Rindo Pratama
Cover Image Source: Pexels | Photo by Vija Rindo Pratama

After being labeled a "red flag" by over 50 women in a Facebook group titled "Are We Dating The Same Guy," a California man, Stewart Lucas Murrey, filed a lawsuit seeking $2.6 million for defamation. The Los Angeles civil court has since dismissed the case, noting that the women had done nothing wrong by expressing their opinions about the man on their Facebook page, The New York Post reported.



 

Hailing from Santa Monica, Murrey sought damages amounting to $2.6 million for defamation and sex-based discrimination. Furthermore, he claimed that the women's Facebook posts caused him "emotional distress and pain and suffering", as per The Post.

On his GoFundMe page, Murrey claimed that at least 238 Facebook accounts were involved in "harming" him. He alleged that these individuals posted his pictures without permission, tracked his whereabouts, fabricated stories, and sensationalized their "unremarkable interactions" with him.

During a press conference last month, several of the women sued by Murrey asserted that they had done nothing wrong and were just "speaking their truth," which happened to be unfavorable to the man. In response, Murrey stated that he had never met the women who participated in the interview and that he "really saw" their faces for the first time on TV.



 

The women also created a GoFundMe page, where they emphasized their unity in "sharing truthful accounts of our personal experiences" and expressing valid concerns about the man's unsettling behavior and background. They asserted that Murrey "poses a legitimate danger to the women of Los Angeles."

In response to Murrey's claims in the lawsuit about the women tracking his whereabouts, Kelly Gibbons, one of the defendants, countered by stating that Murrey showed up at her house twice without notice.

"I never told him where I live, I never gave him my address. He went out of his way to track down where I live. It's disturbing. The second time my roommate was home and told me that somebody was knocking on the door but they didn't answer. He's holding his cellphone pointing at my house, my doors, and windows," Gibbons, 32, told DailyMail.



 

Gibbons also disclosed screenshots of conversations between her and Murrey, who purported to be a scholar on the dating platform "Hinge." She revealed that the man personally delivered the legal papers regarding the lawsuit to her, which she accepted in an attempt to halt his unannounced visits to her house.

According to DailyMail, Murrey defended his actions by claiming that he visited the defendants' residences because they had allegedly tried to evade being served with the papers. He asserted that some of them falsely claimed not to have been served, prompting him to deliver the papers in person and record video evidence of the encounters.

On the contrary, Gibbons labeled the case against her as "frivolous" and "baseless." "The case would establish a precedent and prevent him from abusing the legal system against them," said other women in the press conference. They also invoked California's anti-SLAPP laws, designed to deter meritless lawsuits.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
With slacking consumer spending and the 43-day shutdown, the GDP grew by just 1.4%.
7 hours ago
Economist Joseph Stiglitz claimed no policy was helping boost blue-collar jobs amid automation.
7 hours ago
Turns out a hug from James O'Halloran was worth more than the cash for Nikki.
7 hours ago
Although the player was off in her guess by nearly $10, she had a buffer to work with.
9 hours ago
Harvey was excited to learn how Amrett impressed his dates.
14 hours ago
Sen. Sanders called out the “greed” and “arrogance” of California's richest in his latest speech.
1 day ago
The guest who wasn't even a fan of Dolphins, owned one of the most important souvenirs of the team.
1 day ago
The mayor and the DCWP has sent out warning notices to 187 big-name gyms and health clubs
1 day ago
The new rule proposed by the VA allegedly changed the basis of determining the benefits.
1 day ago
The guest admitted that she will be "very careful" with the watch once she got home.
2 days ago
New Zealand eased restrictions for its golden visa and Americans are dominating the applications
2 days ago
ZOA Energy agreed to settle a case alleging it misled customers with its zero preservatives claim
2 days ago
Despite being bald, Harvey knew some of the answers didn't make sense.
2 days ago
Yang claims if one company cuts workers, it will turn into a competition which will be devastating.
3 days ago
The President called it a "Democrat Shutdown" blaming his political opponents for stalling talks.
3 days ago
After learning about the item, Harvey politely requested everyone to never gift him that.
3 days ago
After spotting a contestant in an all white family, Harvey had to make sure he was doing okay.
3 days ago
The contestant, Alison Betts hedged a massive bet on her opponents getting the answer wrong.
5 days ago
While customers may benefit, U.S. automakers could suffer due to the cut-throat pricing competition.
5 days ago