ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / NEWS

San Francisco Loses $484 Million in Revenue Due to Remote Work

As remote work became more prevalent, the city's business tax base started eroding.
PUBLISHED JUL 18, 2023
Image Source: Pexels/CadoMaestro
Image Source: Pexels/CadoMaestro

A recent report from top economists at San Francisco City Hall has shed light on the financial implications of remote work on the city's tax revenue. According to the report, the rise of remote work, particularly in the finance, information, and tech sectors, led to a decrease of $484 million in tax revenue for the city in 2021. As mentioned by SFist, this revelation has sparked discussions about the concentration of San Francisco's tax base and its vulnerability to changes in the business landscape.

According to a Chronicle writeup, while the figure of $484 million may seem alarming, it is important to note that this number does not represent an actual loss in the city's budget. The report clarifies that the city's revenue from gross receipts tax and homelessness gross receipts tax did not decline by that amount. Instead, the figure serves as a fiscal impact assessment, illustrating the revenue that the city was not entitled to due to the reduced presence of office employees physically working in San Francisco.



 

Gross receipts taxes in San Francisco are calculated based on the number of employees located within the city. As remote work became more prevalent, the city's business tax base began eroding. The report warns of the challenges posed by this new era of remote work, which is slowly reversing the city's tax revenue growth.



 

One significant issue highlighted in the report is the concentration of San Francisco's tax revenue among a small number of large companies. While the report does not identify these companies, it is likely that tech giants such as Salesforce and Wells Fargo are among them. According to the Chronicle, the five largest taxpayers accounted for $339 million in business taxes, approximately 24% of the total. The San Francisco Business Times takes a broader perspective, stating that the city relies on just 10 companies for a third of its business tax revenue.



 

Dependence on a handful of major corporations poses a significant risk to San Francisco's tax revenue. If one or two of these companies were to falter or relocate their headquarters elsewhere, it could have a substantial impact on the city's finances. Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, who requested the report, is using its findings to drive his political agenda, and future political battles are likely to ensue.

Despite concerns about the concentration of tax revenue, San Francisco's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) experienced substantial growth, increasing by nearly $25 billion in 2020 and 2021. This growth represents the largest increase among counties with over 500,000 residents, even considering the population decline. This data challenges the notion that San Francisco is inherently "anti-business."



 

Many of the prominent tech companies, often referred to as 'Tech Titans' have a significant presence or are headquartered in San Francisco. However, their presence in the city remains uncertain in the future due to the rise of remote work. While these companies contribute to San Francisco's economy, the remote work trend could potentially lead to a shift in their operations and office locations.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The player named Kathy Young missed out on the Showcase Showdown as she had to leave.
2 hours ago
Harrison closed a mega deal by scooping up three post cards for the price of one.
3 hours ago
The guest who brought his father's prized possesion, had already made up his mind.
6 hours ago
Harvey got a genius solution to avoid asking an awkward question to Carson Kressley's family member.
1 day ago
The player could barely control her excitement as she had a near-perfect game on the show.
1 day ago
Harrison knew it was too good of a collection to let go, and he decided to raise the stakes.
2 days ago
The guest who had little no idea about his family heirloom was shocked to know its significance.
2 days ago
Despite making a higher than usual offer, Harrison failed to close the deal.
2 days ago
The guest regretted that she wouldn't be able to keep the highly valued item in her home anymore.
2 days ago
They also triggered a showdown between Mark Cuban and Daniel Lubetsky before closing the deal.
3 days ago
As Heather took a second to solve the final puzzle, Seacrest admitted she made it look easy.
3 days ago
Carey suffered a similar snafu a few months ago while playing the same game of 'Bullseye'.
4 days ago
Fans also share some tips that could've helped Bain win the bonus round but it was too late.
4 days ago
Emily Croke coincidentally got the question related to her great-great aunt, Emily Folger.
4 days ago
Luckily for the veteran host, no one in the studio caught the mistake on time.
4 days ago
The executive producer of the show, Michael Davies later apologized for the spoiled show.
4 days ago
Even the seasoned expert was stumped by the unusual subject of the painting.
4 days ago
In the end, Mr Wonderful cut off Greiner with a deal that the founder of Wad Free couldn't refuse.
5 days ago
Seacrest got geniunely spooked as he couldn't figure out who played a prank on him.
5 days ago
The seller brought some "Secret Service" memorabilia of former Attorney General J. Howard McGrath.
5 days ago