195 House Representatives Voted Against the Contraception Bill

As lawmakers seek to codify the right to contraception into federal law, hundreds of House Representatives voted against the bill.

Rachel Curry - Author

Jul. 22 2022, Published 2:01 p.m. ET

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade — and Justice Clarence Thomas’ comments on revisiting contraception and same-sex marriage rights — lawmakers are pushing to codify potentially at-risk legislation. U.S. House Representatives passed the Right to Contraception Act on Thursday, July 21, but a staggering 195 House Republicans voted against the bill.

Article continues below advertisement
Article continues below advertisement

Those who voted against the bill to solidify Americans’ right to contraception options at a federal level weren’t enough to stall it in the House, but the Senate will likely be a different story due to the filibuster.

The Right to Contraception Act: A rundown

In the draft Right to Contraception Act, lawmakers state, “A person has a statutory right under this Act to obtain contraceptives and to engage in contraception, and a healthcare provider has a corresponding right to provide contraceptives, contraception, and information related to contraception.” The act goes on to limit a state’s ability to interfere with this through its own legislation.

Article continues below advertisement

Without a federal protection, emergency contraception like Plan B and Ella pills could be at the most pressing risk due to the fact that they intercept pregnancy after sex. However, other birth control, such as daily oral contraceptives or internal solutions like Mirena, could also be at risk at the state level. The right to contraception for unmarried individuals passed via Eisenstadt v. Baird in 1972, the same year the Supreme Court passed Roe v. Wade. With Roe v. Wade overturned, the high court could easily overturn adjacent decisions.

Birth control is healthcare and treats conditions including premenstrual dysphoric disorder, anemia, endometriosis, adenomyosis, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and more.

Article continues below advertisement
Article continues below advertisement

Here are details about some of the House members who voted against contraception rights.

Of the total 213 Republicans in the House, only eight voted for the bill that could protect contraceptive healthcare at a federal level. Meanwhile, 195 of the Republicans voted against the bill, and the rest refrained.

Some representatives in the “no” group include:

  • Matt Gaetz (Fla.), who wrote on Twitter, “I support contraception. I’ll be voting NO on the ‘contraception bill’ today. Contraception likely needs protection FROM Congress more than it needs protection BY Congress. If there is any entity you don’t want involved in your contraception choices - it’s the federal gov.”

  • Paul Gosar (Ariz.), who said in a 2014 press release in response to former President Obama’s employee healthcare contraception mandate, “A business owner who believes that paying for contraceptives that can potentially put an end to human life is immoral shouldn’t be forced to do so.”

  • Jack Bergman (Mich.), one of five Michigan House members to vote against the federally codified right to contraception.

  • Robert Aderholt (Ala.), who has been fighting the right to contraception since the early aughts when he said, “Being against abortion I can't support the morning-after pill for anyone.”

  • Mayra Flores (Tex.), who is outspoken about her pro-life stance, which seeps into the contraception converstation.

Meanwhile, Republican Reps. Liz Cheney (Wyo.), Brian Fitzpatrick of (Penn.), Anthony Gonzalez (Ohio), and five others joined Democrats by voting in favor of codified contraceptive rights.


Latest U.S. Economy & Politics News and Updates

    Opt-out of personalized ads

    © Copyright 2024 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.