Where Whiting Petroleum Stands Next to Peers

Whiting Petroleum’s (WLL) forward EV-to-EBITDA multiple of ~5.4x is mostly in line with the peer average of 5.5x.

Keisha Bandz - Author

Dec. 14 2017, Updated 12:26 p.m. ET

uploads///peers comp

Forward EV-to-EBITDA

Whiting Petroleum’s (WLL) forward EV-to-EBITDA (enterprise value to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization) multiple of ~5.4x is mostly in line with the peer average of 5.5x.

Peer SM Energy (SM) is trading at a higher forward EV-to-EBITDA multiple of ~6.1x, while Oasis Petroleum (OAS) and Carrizo Oil & Gas (CRZO) are trading at slightly higher multiples of ~6.04x and ~5.4x, respectively. PDC Energy (PDCE) is trading at a lower multiple of 4.78x.

Article continues below advertisement
Article continues below advertisement

Profit margins

Among major peers, Whiting Petroleum and PDCE have the lowest profit margins of around -45.9%. WLL and PDCE  reported higher net losses of $173 million and $292 million, respectively, in 3Q17, which helps explain their lower profit margins.

By comparison, Oasis reported a net loss of $41.2 million and SM Energy reported a net loss of $89 million 3Q17. Carrizo reported a net income of $5.5 million.

Debt-to-asset ratio

Carrizo has the highest debt-to-asset ratio among its peers at ~62%. SM Energy’s debt-to-asset ratio is the second-highest among peers at 47%, while PDC Energy has the lowest debt-to-asset ratio of ~24.5%.

Remember, a higher debt-to-asset ratio indicates that a higher proportion of a company’s assets are financed through debt, and so the higher the ratio, the higher the financial risk.


Latest Whiting Petroleum Corp News and Updates

    Opt-out of personalized ads

    © Copyright 2024 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.