ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

New York retailer finds a solution to catch shoplifters — but customers have a major issue

The city's law dictates that all businesses using such surveillance tech must make it public.
PUBLISHED 4 DAYS AGO
Representative image of shoppers. (Cover image source: Photo by Jessica McGowan/Getty Images)
Representative image of shoppers. (Cover image source: Photo by Jessica McGowan/Getty Images)

No one wants their biometrics to be collected while they’re out shopping, but that is what Wegmans customers are having to deal with, and they’re not happy about it. The retailer recently revealed that it uses facial recognition at its New York City stores for the safety and security of its customers. The technology is used to keep problematic customers and shoplifters at bay. However, the issue is that everyone’s faces are being recorded and remembered.

Representative image of a Wegmans store. (Image credit: Getty Images | Photo by Erik Gonzalez Garcia)
Representative image of a Wegmans store. (Image source: Getty Images | Photo by Erik Gonzalez Garcia)

Facial recognition has been used for many years, though Americans are usually not happy about it. Retailers do not even have to be transparent about using this technology in certain states. However, New York City law dictates that if facial recognition is being used, it has to be made public. The city’s lawmakers have proposed banning businesses from using the technology, but as per a CNN report, legislation has stalled.

Shoppers were not happy when they learned about this, and some even took to social media to make their discontent known. However, they understood why this was being done. “I'm not particularly fond of this kind of tech, but I understand why it's being used. The state has made it apparent that they won't do anything to curtail shoplifting, so companies have to get creative,” one user wrote on Reddit.

Representative image of a shopper buying meat from Walmart. (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Bob Riha, Jr.)
Representative image of shoppers. (Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Bob Riha, Jr.)

“They’re doing it because the data is valuable. Shoplifting is just a convenient excuse,” quipped another. “Businesses use whatever excuse they want to take away your freedom, and there are no repercussions if they lie. People must push back. Don't shop at Wegmans or wear a mask. Fight back in some way,” a third user wrote. There were also a lot of people who supported the cause. “You think Wegmans wants to do this? This tech probably costs them millions. That means whatever theft it’s protecting against is costing them more than that,” another shopper wrote.

Backlash has forced Wegmans to release a statement, in which they have maintained that the technology was only used for the safety of the store and its customers. “This technology is solely used for keeping our stores secure and safe. The system collects facial recognition data and only uses it to identify individuals who have been previously flagged for misconduct.  We do not collect other biometric data, such as retinal scans or voice prints. Images and video are retained only as long as necessary for security purposes and then disposed of,” it read.

The Wegmans logo on a window. (Image credit: Getty Images | James Leynse)
The Wegmans logo on a window. (Image source: Getty Images | James Leynse)

The problem with facial recognition is that there are no federal, state, or local regulations to check its use. As a result, an instrument so powerful can easily be abused by those with the resources. People have grown skeptical of its use, and it is understandable why.

More on Market Realist:

Walmart shopper points at a major issue over product pricing: 'Make sure you are checking'

Retailers including Walmart and Target can now decline your credit card — key details revealed

Texas-based grocery chain beats big names like Costco and Amazon to become the best in America

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Had she taken their advice, she'd be leaving the stage $15000 richer
48 minutes ago
Multiple services have opened up in the country that charge people for interviews with companies.
1 hour ago
The President spoke about how GDP grew under his watch and called out Democrats over affordability.
3 hours ago
There are now eight municipalities and 21 states that implement this tax.
3 hours ago
The duo has been buying tickets together for a long time and had promised to split a big prize.
3 hours ago
Trump allegedly made dozens of false economic claims about falling prices and inflation
3 hours ago
The President argued that the cuts were aimed that getting the people out that were not necessary.
4 hours ago
Rising college costs and growing student debt are reshaping higher education.
6 hours ago
Scott Bessent said the Dow at 50,000 signals strong growth and gains for Main Street ahead
7 hours ago
Peter Schiff warned Trump’s new tariffs will raise prices and worsen the U.S. affordability crisis.
8 hours ago
For people with allergies, exposure to some of the allergic ingredients can trigger a wide range of reactions.
2 days ago
Numbers gathered by economists show that Trump's claims in his WSJ piece are misinformed at best.
2 days ago
While the ownership rate rebounded after years of decline, millennials still feel cost is a hurdle.
3 days ago
TrumpRx costs may be as much as 80% less than normal listings, though actual savings may differ.
3 days ago
The Amazon boss laid off a third of The Washington Post employees, including reporters on duty.
3 days ago
Members are now required to scan their membership cards simply to get inside a Costco store.
3 days ago
Natalie's younger daughter Bailey couldn't hold back her tears after her mother won a grand total of $63,990.
3 days ago
It seemed at one point that the contestant might have missed her chance to win big.
4 days ago
The FDA recently slapped a Class-II warning label on the product, which was sold by the thousands.
4 days ago
The city's law dictates that all businesses using such surveillance tech must make it public.
4 days ago