Conventional versus unconventional sources
Oil drilling is mainly classified into two categories: offshore and onshore. But the industry can also be classified as conventional or unconventional. Unconventional sources of oil do not flow to the surface, as the conventional sources do, and the former sources need different methods of extraction. Onshore unconventional oil sources include heavy oils, oil sands, shale oil, and tight sand. These unconventional sources have started gaining popularity in recent years, but the crude from these sources are more costly to produce than conventional sources are.
Comparing costs: onshore versus offshore
Traditional onshore drilling is cheaper than offshore drilling, but the overall cost of unconventional onshore oil is on par with or exceeds offshore drilling costs. These costs also differ according to the region of oil production. For example, the lowest breakeven cost is $25 per barrel for onshore oil production in the Middle East (According to Rystad Energy Research). Due to lower breakeven costs for onshore compared to offshore drilling, these companies tend to perform better when oil prices tumble. Offshore drilling companies include Diamond Offshore (DO), Rowan Companies (RDC), Pacific Drilling (PACD), Ocean Rig (ORIG), and Transocean (RIG), among others.
Capex of E&P companies
Global Oil Company’s capex, to use one example, has climbed rapidly over the past few years. According to industry analysts, the approximate investment for offshore drilling in 2005 was around $150 billion, but this figure jumped to $360 billion till 2014. This increase in capex was due to increases in oil consumption as well as to the rising demand for offshore production and to inflation. As oil prices decline, oil company’s profits decline, and this cuts its upstream capex budget.
Falling oil prices more adversely impact the onshore drilling industry as offshore drilling (XLE) contracts and investments have longer lead time. Capital budgets for shale decline the most when oil prices are tumbling, but shale-producing companies are more flexible to short-term price collapses. Operators can drop shale rigs more quickly than they can with offshore rigs. But once oil prices rebound, shale will likely be the fastest to recover. That said, investments in shale have the lowest payback period and the highest internal rate of return.
Continue to the next part for a deeper discussion of high leverage among offshore drilling companies.
Among the biggest ETFs in the offshore drilling space, investors can choose between ETFs like OIH, XLE, and IYE for exposure to offshore drilling.
Broadcom (AVGO) stock fell ~8.5% after markets closed yesterday following the semiconductor giant's fiscal 2019 second-quarter earnings release. It missed analysts' revenue estimate and cut its fiscal 2019 revenue guidance by $2 billion to $22.5 billion due to sluggishness in its semiconductor solutions business.
The SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD), which tracks physical gold prices, has underperformed the broader markets year-to-date, rising just 4.4% compared to the S&P 500’s (SPY) gain of 15.9% as of June 14. The sentiment for gold, however, has been turning around.
Safe havens such as Treasuries and gold were back in favor on June 14 as stocks fell due to rising tensions in the Middle East, concerns over growth, and the looming threat of the US-China trade war. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index fell 0.67% in the first hour of trading.
Lululemon (LULU) stock rose 2.1% on June 13 in reaction to better-than-expected first-quarter results and an upgraded outlook for fiscal 2019 overall. The company's first-quarter adjusted EPS grew 34.5% to $0.74 on revenue growth of 20.4% to $782.32 million. Analysts had expected EPS of $0.70 and revenue of $755.31 million. Here's why the outlook got an upgrade.
As of 4:40 AM Eastern Time today, US crude oil active futures were at $51.83, ~4% below their closing level in the previous week. If US crude oil prices stay at those levels today, they'll mark their third week of decline in five weeks.
Amazon is discontinuing its Amazon Restaurants service, which has been delivering food for restaurants in parts of the United States. Amazon Restaurants launched in the United States in 2015 and entered the British market the following year. However, it met strong opposition in the British market.