Corporate credit yields indicate the rate at which companies can borrow money
“Corporate credit yields” is a general term for the rate at which companies can issue debt (that is, borrow money). Higher corporate credit yields mean more expensive borrowing rates for companies, so higher yields are generally negative for companies—especially those with high funding needs, which includes many upstream energy producers. These needs might include expensive capital expenditure (spending and investment) programs, acquisitions, and refinancing of debt coming due. Inversely, lower yields benefit companies because they result in lower borrowing costs.
Yields finished higher last week
Last week, the yield on the Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BofAML) High Yield Index, the benchmark corporate credit index for non–investment-grade companies (also known as high yield companies) increased from 6.30% on July 26 to 6.36% on August 2, resulting in a negative for high yield companies needing debt funding. For much of 2Q13, rates had been climbing rapidly, as the market worried about the Fed Reserve curtailing stimulus measures. However, during 3Q13, it seemed that the yield on the BofAML High Yield Index began to stabilize.
Investors use the BofA Merrill Lynch High Yield Master Index as a gauge for where rates for high yield companies are trading
“High yield” is a term used to classify companies with below a BBB rating from rating agencies such as Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s. So high yield companies are generally companies with worse credit quality (which could be due to a number of factors such as size, leverage, or diversification). You can monitor general corporate credit yields through an index such as the BofA Merrill Lynch Index, which aggregates data from many corporate bonds. The chart above shows the yields on the BofAML U.S. High Yield Master II Index, which represents the universe of domestic high yield bonds. Recently, the yield on the BofAML HY Index touched its highest point in 2013 after nearly two months of rates increasing. However, the yield on the Index has come down somewhat.
Upstream independent energy companies often spend more than internally generated cash flow and therefore must look to capital markets to raise funds
Investors should consider monitoring corporate yields, as a material move upward in borrowing rates is a negative for companies, as we saw earlier this year. This is especially true for companies that will need to raise money in the debt market and may be forced to do so at higher rates if yields move upward. Companies with planned capital spending above cash flow, for instance, will need to source the cash shortfall somewhere, and one option would be to issue bonds in the debt capital markets. Other companies that might need to access the debt markets include companies planning to make an acquisition or companies with bond maturities coming due that need to be refinanced (and likely not enough cash on the balance sheet to simply pay the bond off). Many upstream independent energy companies spend more than internally generated cash flow—especially those in high growth mode with significant expansion and development plans.
Companies whose capex (capital expenditure) is likely to exceed internally generated cash flow (as determined by consensus estimates of EBITDA and stated capex guidance) include Oasis Petroleum (OAS), Laredo Petroleum (LPI), Chesapeake Energy (CHK), and SandRidge Energy (SD).
The movement higher in high yield rates over the past week was a short-term negative for high yield companies. Plus, though yields have retreated from 2013 highs, they climbed significantly through 2Q13, resulting in a medium-term negative. Given the possibility of sudden rate movements like we’ve seen over the two months, this is a factor that investors may wish to monitor—especially if they expect a company will need access to the debt market in the near future. Note that many high yield energy companies are part of the Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). For more on high yield and debt markets, please see Must-know: High yield fund flows regaining strength, time to dip back in?
© 2013 Market Realist, Inc.