The beans

Starbucks’ (SBUX) main cost driver is its price per pound of coffee beans. The two most consumed coffee beans are Arabica and Robusta blends, which Starbucks sources from numerous continents to keep up with demand. Arabica is the most consumed coffee bean species due to its milder flavor compared to Robusta. Starbucks primarily purchases Arabica beans because the weaker flavor mixes more easily to create the 30 blends used across all product platforms.

Understanding Starbucks’ cost structure and operating expenses

Starbucks’ massive market capitalization allows it to leverage economies of scale. Unfortunately, there are no accurate dollar amounts available concerning the cost Starbucks pays to produce one cup of regular coffee. Amateur speculative estimates range from $0.20 to $0.75. Starbucks’ cost structure is relatively straightforward, resembling those of typical “high-end” fast-casual restaurants, such as Panera (PNRA) or Chipotle (CMG). This means slim margins attributable to industry competition (SBUX’s 2013 profit margin is 0.06% due to an unfavorable litigation outcome involving Kraft Foods). Healthy companies in this industry boast strong operating cash flows and high capital expenditures attributable to kitchen maintenance and vertical integration efforts. Cash flows from financing activities differ at firms’ discretion. Starbucks has recently been repurchasing its own shares and paying dividends to increase returns to investors. Others seek capital to fund international expansion attempts and capital expenses.

Understanding Starbucks’ cost structure and operating expenses


Starbucks initially appears weaker than its main domestic rival, Dunkin’ Donuts (DNKN), in terms of costs and operating margins. However, Dunkin’ doesn’t incur the full cost of beans on its income statements (which Starbucks does) due to the nature of its business model. Dunkin’s revenue largely comprises royalties that its franchises pay to the company. Franchise owners are responsible for managing costs of goods sold. Dunkin’ simply instructs the owners where to purchase inputs and lays claim to a percentage of their profits. This accounting trick benefits Dunkin’ in the eyes of the untrained investor, but Dunkin’s performance depends on bean commodity prices as much as Starbucks’ performance.

Starbucks’ historical operating costs have been declining (2013 operating expenses have been normalized and exclude the $2.8 billion litigation charge mentioned above). The costs of goods sold, depreciation and amortization expenses, and store operating expenses have declined over the last six years, with only general and administrative expenses rising. This translates into improving margins over time due to business growth and efficient cost management.

Latest articles

Today, Canopy Growth announced that it acquired the Saskatchewan-based KeyLeaf Life Sciences along with entities relating to the company and its intellectual property. Here's what you need to know about the completed deal.

Yesterday, Tyson Foods (TSN) and fellow meat producers Pilgrim’s Pride (PPC) and Sanderson Farms (SAFM) took a hit to their stocks after news came out about an investigation over price-fixing allegations.

On June 24, RH (RH) was trading at $115.01, implying a rise of 21.2% since its announcement of its first-quarter earnings results on June 12. Despite the surge in its stock price, the company is still trading at a discount of 29.1% to its 52-week high.

26 Jun

Roku Stock Fell Close to 7.0% Yesterday

WRITTEN BY Aditya Raghunath

Roku stock fell 6.8% yesterday to close trading at $93.25 per share. Roku stock has lost over 9.0% in market value in the last two trading days. Prior to this pullback, Roku stock was up a whopping 235.0% year-to-date.

26 Jun

Beyond Meat Stock Up Today on New Product Launch

WRITTEN BY Rajiv Nanjapla

Today, Beyond Meat (BYND) announced that its new product, Beyond Beef, will hit markets across the US later this week.

FedEx (FDX) ended fiscal 2019 on a dismal note and reported a significant YoY decline in fourth-quarter earnings. The delivery giant posted adjusted EPS of $5.01, which was 15.2% lower than the year-ago quarter’s earnings of $5.91. The company cited sluggish revenue growth and increased expenses as the main reason behind the dismal bottom-line performance.