The beans

Starbucks’ (SBUX) main cost driver is its price per pound of coffee beans. The two most consumed coffee beans are Arabica and Robusta blends, which Starbucks sources from numerous continents to keep up with demand. Arabica is the most consumed coffee bean species due to its milder flavor compared to Robusta. Starbucks primarily purchases Arabica beans because the weaker flavor mixes more easily to create the 30 blends used across all product platforms.

Understanding Starbucks’ cost structure and operating expenses

Starbucks’ massive market capitalization allows it to leverage economies of scale. Unfortunately, there are no accurate dollar amounts available concerning the cost Starbucks pays to produce one cup of regular coffee. Amateur speculative estimates range from $0.20 to $0.75. Starbucks’ cost structure is relatively straightforward, resembling those of typical “high-end” fast-casual restaurants, such as Panera (PNRA) or Chipotle (CMG). This means slim margins attributable to industry competition (SBUX’s 2013 profit margin is 0.06% due to an unfavorable litigation outcome involving Kraft Foods). Healthy companies in this industry boast strong operating cash flows and high capital expenditures attributable to kitchen maintenance and vertical integration efforts. Cash flows from financing activities differ at firms’ discretion. Starbucks has recently been repurchasing its own shares and paying dividends to increase returns to investors. Others seek capital to fund international expansion attempts and capital expenses.

Understanding Starbucks’ cost structure and operating expenses


Starbucks initially appears weaker than its main domestic rival, Dunkin’ Donuts (DNKN), in terms of costs and operating margins. However, Dunkin’ doesn’t incur the full cost of beans on its income statements (which Starbucks does) due to the nature of its business model. Dunkin’s revenue largely comprises royalties that its franchises pay to the company. Franchise owners are responsible for managing costs of goods sold. Dunkin’ simply instructs the owners where to purchase inputs and lays claim to a percentage of their profits. This accounting trick benefits Dunkin’ in the eyes of the untrained investor, but Dunkin’s performance depends on bean commodity prices as much as Starbucks’ performance.

Starbucks’ historical operating costs have been declining (2013 operating expenses have been normalized and exclude the $2.8 billion litigation charge mentioned above). The costs of goods sold, depreciation and amortization expenses, and store operating expenses have declined over the last six years, with only general and administrative expenses rising. This translates into improving margins over time due to business growth and efficient cost management.

Latest articles

JCPenney (JCP) is slated to announce its results for the first quarter of fiscal 2019, which ended on May 4, on May 21.

17 May

What to Know about the US-China Trade War

WRITTEN BY Mayur Sontakke, CFA, FRM

The key point of contention in the US-China trade dispute is the large trade deficit the United States runs against China.

On May 16, the Labor Department reported jobless claims for last week. Initial jobless claims fell by 16,000 to 212,000 for the week ended May 11.

Jeffrey Gundlach recommended investors take advantage of the volatility in interest rates at the recent Sohn Conference.

Tesla (TSLA) has fallen 4.2% as of 11:55 AM EDT on May 17. While US equity markets opened in the red today, they've recouped their losses.

According to Reuters, on May 16, Vale (VALE) told prosecutors that a dam was at risk of rupturing at its Gongo Soco mine.