ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Here's how a Scam Artist Illegally Streamed 37 Songs Created by Others Under his own Name

A man in Denmark was found guilty of wrongly making money from music streaming royalties.
PUBLISHED MAR 24, 2024
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels

Before music streaming services such as Spotify took the industry by storm, record labels and artists were struggling to protect their tunes against piracy through online portals from where users across the world downloaded Mp3 files. But while those platforms may have become irrelevant with genuine tracks available for listening online, a 53-year-old Dane from East Jutland has been jailed for a massive music streaming fraud scheme. He has been convicted of illegally streaming hundreds of songs and raising more than $29 Million. During the trial in Aarhus, the court found that the alleged streaming account was incorrect and that the man had used illegal means to boost it.

Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels
Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels

The man was found guilty of copyright infringement of 37 songs and he did so by hiring other artists, altering the tracks slightly, and then releasing then under his own name.

His punishment included three months in prison for a total of one year and six months. In addition, the judge ruled that two million Danish kroner be seized, half from the guy and half from his business. He also received a 200,000 Danish kroner penalty. Between 2014 and 2017, he became Denmark's 46th highest-earning composer for streaming due to the volume of streams he falsely created.

Copyright campaigners and members of the music industry hailed the decision as a historic one. In 2018, Maria Fredenslund, the CEO of the Danish Rights Alliance said, “We are glad that the court recognized streaming fraud as a serious crime. This verdict is historic and emphasizes the seriousness of the issue of stream manipulation. It also shows that such fraud can be detected and that both rights holders and authorities take it seriously.”

"This sets an important precedent to prevent similar cases, especially with the advancements in artificial intelligence," she said, emphasizing the significance of the case for the future. "This is genuinely a significant and historic case," stated Anna Lidell, chair of Autor, the largest Danish group for composers, songwriters, lyricists, and producers.

Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels
Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels

Anna Lidell added, "By changing and releasing the tracks, the man illegally obtained millions of listens and violated copyright." This undercuts the efforts of individuals who put in a lot of effort every day to make music but struggle to make ends meet. At first, he was charged with earning 4.38 million kroner through the streaming of 689 musical compositions on services like YouSee Musik, Apple Music, and Spotify. The court, however, declared on Thursday that they did not have sufficient information to verify the precise quantity of synthetic tunes played, the frequency of plays, or the royalties received.

Senior expert prosecutor Amir Amirian stressed the importance of the case, pointing out that it is the first of its sort in Denmark. He emphasized that the decision classified this as data fraud, highlighting its illegality as opposed to a legal loophole. He believes that other people thinking of pursuing similar methods will be discouraged by this verdict.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Kiyosaki urged people to invest in precious metals and cryptocurrency to be prepared.
3 hours ago
She's not made a lot of public appearances since her mammoth win on the show.
3 hours ago
Despite the cancellation of its contract, Musk believes that DOGE was on the right track.
4 hours ago
Hundreds of shoppers waited in line overnight in the cold, only to be left utterly disappointed.
4 hours ago
Speaking to CNN, Yang talked about how AI will impact communities and what could be the solution
4 hours ago
The move has been hailed by those who already own houses, but those who do not will be in trouble.
4 hours ago
Many believe that the cost of a college degree is a debt they'd want to bear for years to come.
1 day ago
Tim Wu, a Columbia Law School professor, says companies are trying to find power over people.
1 day ago
These young Americans are often condemned for their trading habits, but there is logic to it.
1 day ago
This adds another chapter to the seemingly endless product recalls this year has seen so far.
1 day ago
The new format added an element of unpredictability, which might not have been present earlier.
1 day ago
There was no official announcement or statement by the company about the move.
4 days ago
He also cautioned that investors are ill-prepared for the challenges that lie ahead as the AI cycle enters a "more dangerous phase."
4 days ago
The price point of these passes may come as a surprise to some as prices of necessities are rising.
4 days ago
The contestant did his best but was not able to get the correct answer in his ten seconds.
4 days ago
He tore the President apart in a video on social media, making his disapproval known.
4 days ago
The faulty products could lead to serious harm and may even result in death in the worst case.
4 days ago
The report paints a picture of how the future of work may look like.
5 days ago
Some of the largest Fortune 500 companies across sectors have announced job cuts this year.
5 days ago
The rise in AI stocks has been triggered by remarks made by Fed officials indicating a greater chance of a rate decrease next month, he warned.
5 days ago