ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Here's how a Scam Artist Illegally Streamed 37 Songs Created by Others Under his own Name

A man in Denmark was found guilty of wrongly making money from music streaming royalties.
PUBLISHED MAR 24, 2024
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels

Before music streaming services such as Spotify took the industry by storm, record labels and artists were struggling to protect their tunes against piracy through online portals from where users across the world downloaded Mp3 files. But while those platforms may have become irrelevant with genuine tracks available for listening online, a 53-year-old Dane from East Jutland has been jailed for a massive music streaming fraud scheme. He has been convicted of illegally streaming hundreds of songs and raising more than $29 Million. During the trial in Aarhus, the court found that the alleged streaming account was incorrect and that the man had used illegal means to boost it.

Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels
Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels

The man was found guilty of copyright infringement of 37 songs and he did so by hiring other artists, altering the tracks slightly, and then releasing then under his own name.

His punishment included three months in prison for a total of one year and six months. In addition, the judge ruled that two million Danish kroner be seized, half from the guy and half from his business. He also received a 200,000 Danish kroner penalty. Between 2014 and 2017, he became Denmark's 46th highest-earning composer for streaming due to the volume of streams he falsely created.

Copyright campaigners and members of the music industry hailed the decision as a historic one. In 2018, Maria Fredenslund, the CEO of the Danish Rights Alliance said, “We are glad that the court recognized streaming fraud as a serious crime. This verdict is historic and emphasizes the seriousness of the issue of stream manipulation. It also shows that such fraud can be detected and that both rights holders and authorities take it seriously.”

"This sets an important precedent to prevent similar cases, especially with the advancements in artificial intelligence," she said, emphasizing the significance of the case for the future. "This is genuinely a significant and historic case," stated Anna Lidell, chair of Autor, the largest Danish group for composers, songwriters, lyricists, and producers.

Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels
Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels

Anna Lidell added, "By changing and releasing the tracks, the man illegally obtained millions of listens and violated copyright." This undercuts the efforts of individuals who put in a lot of effort every day to make music but struggle to make ends meet. At first, he was charged with earning 4.38 million kroner through the streaming of 689 musical compositions on services like YouSee Musik, Apple Music, and Spotify. The court, however, declared on Thursday that they did not have sufficient information to verify the precise quantity of synthetic tunes played, the frequency of plays, or the royalties received.

Senior expert prosecutor Amir Amirian stressed the importance of the case, pointing out that it is the first of its sort in Denmark. He emphasized that the decision classified this as data fraud, highlighting its illegality as opposed to a legal loophole. He believes that other people thinking of pursuing similar methods will be discouraged by this verdict.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The U.S. economy is growing and failing to generate jobs at the same time.
17 hours ago
A World Economic Forum survey revealed that about 41% companies are planning to reduce their workforce.
19 hours ago
The TikTok user shared that the cost of 122 grocery items back then was just $155.
1 day ago
The cost of living adjustment (COLA) won't be as high as it is now in a year's time.
1 day ago
Mortgage rates have been falling in the last year, but the housing market hasn't done well.
1 day ago
The contestant was following the host's advice, but even he did not expect it to work so well.
1 day ago
A man's Walmart experience where an item that cost $12 online, surged to $29 at store, irks the internet
1 day ago
The Treasury Secretary also asked the Fed to go forward with an open mind in 2026.
1 day ago
The South provides a unique shot at affordable living, which is attractive to millions.
1 day ago
"Dan's big win was adding the vowel "I" to his letter combo. Congratulations on $40K!" a fan reacted.
2 days ago
President Trump said he would ask the Congress to 'codify' the ban and share more details soon.
2 days ago
The show also led to a surge of interest in several products that translated into rising sales.
2 days ago
The contestant had the best chance to win the car but her own choices cost her.
2 days ago
It turns out that a lot of Americans are not interested in or adept at doing hands-on work.
2 days ago
The player was able to match five of the six numbers, including the Powerball number.
2 days ago
The HHS Secretary urged Americans to consume healthy food, but their prices are the biggest problem.
2 days ago
The cookies were sold during December of last year and could lead to fatal instances.
2 days ago
"I'm not going to lie, that was a tough puzzle. Deceptively tough. Sorry about the loss! No shade to you for that one," a fan reacted.
3 days ago
Other users were also invested in the way the product turned out days later.
3 days ago
The President has a lot of work to do ahead of the Midterms for his party to do well.
3 days ago