ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Here's how a Scam Artist Illegally Streamed 37 Songs Created by Others Under his own Name

A man in Denmark was found guilty of wrongly making money from music streaming royalties.
PUBLISHED MAR 24, 2024
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels

Before music streaming services such as Spotify took the industry by storm, record labels and artists were struggling to protect their tunes against piracy through online portals from where users across the world downloaded Mp3 files. But while those platforms may have become irrelevant with genuine tracks available for listening online, a 53-year-old Dane from East Jutland has been jailed for a massive music streaming fraud scheme. He has been convicted of illegally streaming hundreds of songs and raising more than $29 Million. During the trial in Aarhus, the court found that the alleged streaming account was incorrect and that the man had used illegal means to boost it.

Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels
Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels

The man was found guilty of copyright infringement of 37 songs and he did so by hiring other artists, altering the tracks slightly, and then releasing then under his own name.

His punishment included three months in prison for a total of one year and six months. In addition, the judge ruled that two million Danish kroner be seized, half from the guy and half from his business. He also received a 200,000 Danish kroner penalty. Between 2014 and 2017, he became Denmark's 46th highest-earning composer for streaming due to the volume of streams he falsely created.

Copyright campaigners and members of the music industry hailed the decision as a historic one. In 2018, Maria Fredenslund, the CEO of the Danish Rights Alliance said, “We are glad that the court recognized streaming fraud as a serious crime. This verdict is historic and emphasizes the seriousness of the issue of stream manipulation. It also shows that such fraud can be detected and that both rights holders and authorities take it seriously.”

"This sets an important precedent to prevent similar cases, especially with the advancements in artificial intelligence," she said, emphasizing the significance of the case for the future. "This is genuinely a significant and historic case," stated Anna Lidell, chair of Autor, the largest Danish group for composers, songwriters, lyricists, and producers.

Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels
Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels

Anna Lidell added, "By changing and releasing the tracks, the man illegally obtained millions of listens and violated copyright." This undercuts the efforts of individuals who put in a lot of effort every day to make music but struggle to make ends meet. At first, he was charged with earning 4.38 million kroner through the streaming of 689 musical compositions on services like YouSee Musik, Apple Music, and Spotify. The court, however, declared on Thursday that they did not have sufficient information to verify the precise quantity of synthetic tunes played, the frequency of plays, or the royalties received.

Senior expert prosecutor Amir Amirian stressed the importance of the case, pointing out that it is the first of its sort in Denmark. He emphasized that the decision classified this as data fraud, highlighting its illegality as opposed to a legal loophole. He believes that other people thinking of pursuing similar methods will be discouraged by this verdict.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Fans of the show caught on to the trick the host was talking about, although he didn't reveal it.
7 hours ago
At one point, it seemed like the contestant would fail to win the car.
7 hours ago
Experts expect buyers and sellers to find common ground while negotiating in 2026.
10 hours ago
Individual and bankruptcy filings have been on the up towards a return to pre-COVID levels.
12 hours ago
One GoFundMe page raised over $480,920 for the Ford employee within 24 hours, while another raised over $330,055.
15 hours ago
"Iceland? I am jealous!!! Oh, yeah, I'm jealous of the $40k, too, LOL. Gr8 solve, Mat!" a fan reacted.
19 hours ago
Despite widespread economic concerns, big banks who posted big profits remain bullish.
1 day ago
One simply has to look at the number on the product tag to gauge its quality.
1 day ago
The contestant was quite nervous towards the end but played the game perfectly.
1 day ago
The retailers were part of a group that sued banks and credit card companies two decades ago.
1 day ago
The President signed an executive order about the name change back in September.
1 day ago
The company laid off more than 5,500 employees and that affected its income for the year.
1 day ago
"We're going to have tremendous workforce availability. We're also going to have robots helping us," Trump had stated earlier.
1 day ago
"He almost had it, that was so close," an upset fan said about the disappointing loss.
1 day ago
The President reiterated that believes the affordability crisis is a Democrat hoax.
2 days ago
The contestant was at the show's taping for the first time and was a big fan of Carey's work.
2 days ago
AI is making online shopping easier, but it’s also helping scammers steal more money.
2 days ago
The trend in investors selling US stocks and diversifying in European stocks is growing.
2 days ago
BlackRock is also ready to bet big on the AI boom as it feels the tech is here to stay.
2 days ago
The products were sold both in stores and online, but no illness has been reported yet.
2 days ago