ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Here's how a Scam Artist Illegally Streamed 37 Songs Created by Others Under his own Name

A man in Denmark was found guilty of wrongly making money from music streaming royalties.
PUBLISHED MAR 24, 2024
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels

Before music streaming services such as Spotify took the industry by storm, record labels and artists were struggling to protect their tunes against piracy through online portals from where users across the world downloaded Mp3 files. But while those platforms may have become irrelevant with genuine tracks available for listening online, a 53-year-old Dane from East Jutland has been jailed for a massive music streaming fraud scheme. He has been convicted of illegally streaming hundreds of songs and raising more than $29 Million. During the trial in Aarhus, the court found that the alleged streaming account was incorrect and that the man had used illegal means to boost it.

Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels
Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels

The man was found guilty of copyright infringement of 37 songs and he did so by hiring other artists, altering the tracks slightly, and then releasing then under his own name.

His punishment included three months in prison for a total of one year and six months. In addition, the judge ruled that two million Danish kroner be seized, half from the guy and half from his business. He also received a 200,000 Danish kroner penalty. Between 2014 and 2017, he became Denmark's 46th highest-earning composer for streaming due to the volume of streams he falsely created.

Copyright campaigners and members of the music industry hailed the decision as a historic one. In 2018, Maria Fredenslund, the CEO of the Danish Rights Alliance said, “We are glad that the court recognized streaming fraud as a serious crime. This verdict is historic and emphasizes the seriousness of the issue of stream manipulation. It also shows that such fraud can be detected and that both rights holders and authorities take it seriously.”

"This sets an important precedent to prevent similar cases, especially with the advancements in artificial intelligence," she said, emphasizing the significance of the case for the future. "This is genuinely a significant and historic case," stated Anna Lidell, chair of Autor, the largest Danish group for composers, songwriters, lyricists, and producers.

Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels
Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels

Anna Lidell added, "By changing and releasing the tracks, the man illegally obtained millions of listens and violated copyright." This undercuts the efforts of individuals who put in a lot of effort every day to make music but struggle to make ends meet. At first, he was charged with earning 4.38 million kroner through the streaming of 689 musical compositions on services like YouSee Musik, Apple Music, and Spotify. The court, however, declared on Thursday that they did not have sufficient information to verify the precise quantity of synthetic tunes played, the frequency of plays, or the royalties received.

Senior expert prosecutor Amir Amirian stressed the importance of the case, pointing out that it is the first of its sort in Denmark. He emphasized that the decision classified this as data fraud, highlighting its illegality as opposed to a legal loophole. He believes that other people thinking of pursuing similar methods will be discouraged by this verdict.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The contestant said she was bad at it but there is no excuse for mistaking a continent for a country
5 hours ago
Corey Harrison did not know much about the jersey, but he got a lot of help from the expert.
8 hours ago
The contestant would have become the first man to achieve the big prize.
9 hours ago
The question was about some of the most popular boy bands of all time.
23 hours ago
The guest did not create a fuss but was adamant about the authenticity of his item.
1 day ago
The host's speech made for a sombre moment but he found a way to make that funny as well.
1 day ago
Fans once again called out the puzzle, which, according to them, was too tough.
2 days ago
The guest wanted a five-figure sum at first but was left disappointed by Harrison's stubbornness.
2 days ago
Rick Harrison was not as careful with this item as one would have expected him to be.
2 days ago
The contestant got a couple of chances to answer, and Harvey was left unimpressed on both occasions.
2 days ago
The contestant has denied the host's claims on social media that has fans intrigued.
2 days ago
It must have felt like a full circle moment for the family that had felt similar emotions back then.
3 days ago
The entrepreneur did not have a clear plan to grow the business despite having such a big ask.
3 days ago
All of the other sharks said no due to the risks, but Cuban seemed eager to take the gamble.
4 days ago
The contestant started the game strong but had to wait until the end for the big win.
4 days ago
The contestant faced a tough puzzle and she was not prepared for that at all.
4 days ago
Cuban had seen enough of Mr. Wonderful's greedy tactics, and he decided to take a stand.
5 days ago
Fans were also left as confused as the contestant after seeing the puzzle.
5 days ago
The iconic "Jeopardy!" champion has been hosting the show for many years now.
5 days ago
The host remembered the times he was bullied as a young kid after hearing the chant.
6 days ago