ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Here's how a Scam Artist Illegally Streamed 37 Songs Created by Others Under his own Name

A man in Denmark was found guilty of wrongly making money from music streaming royalties.
PUBLISHED MAR 24, 2024
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels

Before music streaming services such as Spotify took the industry by storm, record labels and artists were struggling to protect their tunes against piracy through online portals from where users across the world downloaded Mp3 files. But while those platforms may have become irrelevant with genuine tracks available for listening online, a 53-year-old Dane from East Jutland has been jailed for a massive music streaming fraud scheme. He has been convicted of illegally streaming hundreds of songs and raising more than $29 Million. During the trial in Aarhus, the court found that the alleged streaming account was incorrect and that the man had used illegal means to boost it.

Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels
Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels

The man was found guilty of copyright infringement of 37 songs and he did so by hiring other artists, altering the tracks slightly, and then releasing then under his own name.

His punishment included three months in prison for a total of one year and six months. In addition, the judge ruled that two million Danish kroner be seized, half from the guy and half from his business. He also received a 200,000 Danish kroner penalty. Between 2014 and 2017, he became Denmark's 46th highest-earning composer for streaming due to the volume of streams he falsely created.

Copyright campaigners and members of the music industry hailed the decision as a historic one. In 2018, Maria Fredenslund, the CEO of the Danish Rights Alliance said, “We are glad that the court recognized streaming fraud as a serious crime. This verdict is historic and emphasizes the seriousness of the issue of stream manipulation. It also shows that such fraud can be detected and that both rights holders and authorities take it seriously.”

"This sets an important precedent to prevent similar cases, especially with the advancements in artificial intelligence," she said, emphasizing the significance of the case for the future. "This is genuinely a significant and historic case," stated Anna Lidell, chair of Autor, the largest Danish group for composers, songwriters, lyricists, and producers.

Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels
Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels

Anna Lidell added, "By changing and releasing the tracks, the man illegally obtained millions of listens and violated copyright." This undercuts the efforts of individuals who put in a lot of effort every day to make music but struggle to make ends meet. At first, he was charged with earning 4.38 million kroner through the streaming of 689 musical compositions on services like YouSee Musik, Apple Music, and Spotify. The court, however, declared on Thursday that they did not have sufficient information to verify the precise quantity of synthetic tunes played, the frequency of plays, or the royalties received.

Senior expert prosecutor Amir Amirian stressed the importance of the case, pointing out that it is the first of its sort in Denmark. He emphasized that the decision classified this as data fraud, highlighting its illegality as opposed to a legal loophole. He believes that other people thinking of pursuing similar methods will be discouraged by this verdict.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
Housing search data flags a shift in buyer sentiment as Californians look beyond Las Vegas for cheaper housing.
3 minutes ago
The company is doing whatever it can to stay ahead of its competitors in the field of AI.
2 hours ago
Industry leaders warn that the Iran conflict could push fertilizer costs higher and eventually drive food inflation.
3 hours ago
This could lead to domestic migration of the wealthy from the state before the law takes effect
3 hours ago
Karoline Leavitt says it won’t affect married women, but critics argue name-change documentation could create new barriers.
3 hours ago
As regulators tighten rules and refineries shut down, the Golden State, also known as the ‘fuel island’, grapples with extremely high gas prices.
21 hours ago
The answer isn't clear yet, but early signs point to his policy backfiring in a bad way.
21 hours ago
Find out how to identify the affected products and what steps to take.
21 hours ago
From skipping meals to avoiding driving, Americans have been backed into a corner financially.
22 hours ago
The company followed the likes of Block and Oracle in axing thousands of jobs.
22 hours ago
In the end, it all came down to luck, and the contestant simply did not have that.
22 hours ago
US consumers could witness another wave of inflation in March despite the IEA releasing oil reserves
1 day ago
There are safeguards to the use of the technology but day-to-day activities are allowed.
2 days ago
The contestant came quite close to winning but it was not to be.
2 days ago
A budget watchdog has sounded the alarm, warning that this would not be sustainable.
2 days ago
Multiple states are taking part in testing programs to ensure that the dream becomes reality soon.
2 days ago
Homeowners are going for adjustable mortgage rates in record rates, reminiscent of the 2008 crisis.
2 days ago
The contestant’s win was impressive, as the game she played is not easy to get right.
2 days ago
The contestant was just happy to be on the show but a surprise win made her experience even better.
2 days ago
People are already struggling with affordability and the war could make things a lot worse.
3 days ago