ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Here's how a Scam Artist Illegally Streamed 37 Songs Created by Others Under his own Name

A man in Denmark was found guilty of wrongly making money from music streaming royalties.
PUBLISHED MAR 24, 2024
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels

Before music streaming services such as Spotify took the industry by storm, record labels and artists were struggling to protect their tunes against piracy through online portals from where users across the world downloaded Mp3 files. But while those platforms may have become irrelevant with genuine tracks available for listening online, a 53-year-old Dane from East Jutland has been jailed for a massive music streaming fraud scheme. He has been convicted of illegally streaming hundreds of songs and raising more than $29 Million. During the trial in Aarhus, the court found that the alleged streaming account was incorrect and that the man had used illegal means to boost it.

Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels
Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels

The man was found guilty of copyright infringement of 37 songs and he did so by hiring other artists, altering the tracks slightly, and then releasing then under his own name.

His punishment included three months in prison for a total of one year and six months. In addition, the judge ruled that two million Danish kroner be seized, half from the guy and half from his business. He also received a 200,000 Danish kroner penalty. Between 2014 and 2017, he became Denmark's 46th highest-earning composer for streaming due to the volume of streams he falsely created.

Copyright campaigners and members of the music industry hailed the decision as a historic one. In 2018, Maria Fredenslund, the CEO of the Danish Rights Alliance said, “We are glad that the court recognized streaming fraud as a serious crime. This verdict is historic and emphasizes the seriousness of the issue of stream manipulation. It also shows that such fraud can be detected and that both rights holders and authorities take it seriously.”

"This sets an important precedent to prevent similar cases, especially with the advancements in artificial intelligence," she said, emphasizing the significance of the case for the future. "This is genuinely a significant and historic case," stated Anna Lidell, chair of Autor, the largest Danish group for composers, songwriters, lyricists, and producers.

Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels
Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels

Anna Lidell added, "By changing and releasing the tracks, the man illegally obtained millions of listens and violated copyright." This undercuts the efforts of individuals who put in a lot of effort every day to make music but struggle to make ends meet. At first, he was charged with earning 4.38 million kroner through the streaming of 689 musical compositions on services like YouSee Musik, Apple Music, and Spotify. The court, however, declared on Thursday that they did not have sufficient information to verify the precise quantity of synthetic tunes played, the frequency of plays, or the royalties received.

Senior expert prosecutor Amir Amirian stressed the importance of the case, pointing out that it is the first of its sort in Denmark. He emphasized that the decision classified this as data fraud, highlighting its illegality as opposed to a legal loophole. He believes that other people thinking of pursuing similar methods will be discouraged by this verdict.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
The tech giant was accused of collecting users' cellular data in an illegal and unethical manner.
10 hours ago
It turns out that if the packaging does not have a harvest date, the olive oil isn't real.
10 hours ago
The rapper said that the hate she received for supporting Trump has only made her support stronger.
10 hours ago
Trump even accused the California Governor of running a drug-money laundering scheme.
13 hours ago
The President has reportedly landed on a candidate who is close to his White House aide.
14 hours ago
"Not very helpful with only one letter on the board, and I can’t believe we have 3 car losses in one week," a fan reacted.
21 hours ago
The guest said that his great-great-grandmother documented everything that went on back then.
1 day ago
Fans of the show were happy with the win but not with how the game was played.
1 day ago
Customers have been urged to destroy the affected products and ask for a refund.
1 day ago
Powell claimed that wealthy Americans held most of the high value assets like real estate and stocks
1 day ago
The company said that affected employees will have 90 days to find a new role internally.
1 day ago
"We applaud that the federal government is providing innovative solutions for employees and families to plan for their future," BoAf stated.
1 day ago
"Twanda was caught up in the "Busy Highway" and missed out on the Mustang. She ended up with a disappointing under $15,000 in prize," a fan reacted.
1 day ago
At that point the "Abbott Elementary" star absolutely had to get the answer right.
2 days ago
It must have been a hard loss to take as he came mighty close to winning it all.
2 days ago
The affected products first went on sale in 2019, with some even sold overseas.
2 days ago
The FDA quickly took note of the matter and slapped a Class II warning on the affected products.
2 days ago
This could be good news for many who may be eligible for compensation.
2 days ago
"These actions are designed to reduce complexity, improve flexibility, and build a responsive and efficient operation," Nike stated.
2 days ago
"Amazing that she solved it before the clock even started!" a fan reacted.
2 days ago