ECONOMY & WORK
MONEY 101
NEWS
PERSONAL FINANCE
NET WORTH
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use DMCA Opt-out of personalized ads
© Copyright 2023 Market Realist. Market Realist is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved. People may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
MARKETREALIST.COM / ECONOMY & WORK

Here's how a Scam Artist Illegally Streamed 37 Songs Created by Others Under his own Name

A man in Denmark was found guilty of wrongly making money from music streaming royalties.
PUBLISHED MAR 24, 2024
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels
Image Source: Photo by Brett Sayles | pexels

Before music streaming services such as Spotify took the industry by storm, record labels and artists were struggling to protect their tunes against piracy through online portals from where users across the world downloaded Mp3 files. But while those platforms may have become irrelevant with genuine tracks available for listening online, a 53-year-old Dane from East Jutland has been jailed for a massive music streaming fraud scheme. He has been convicted of illegally streaming hundreds of songs and raising more than $29 Million. During the trial in Aarhus, the court found that the alleged streaming account was incorrect and that the man had used illegal means to boost it.

Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels
Image Source: Photo by Zulian Yuliansyah | Pexels

The man was found guilty of copyright infringement of 37 songs and he did so by hiring other artists, altering the tracks slightly, and then releasing then under his own name.

His punishment included three months in prison for a total of one year and six months. In addition, the judge ruled that two million Danish kroner be seized, half from the guy and half from his business. He also received a 200,000 Danish kroner penalty. Between 2014 and 2017, he became Denmark's 46th highest-earning composer for streaming due to the volume of streams he falsely created.

Copyright campaigners and members of the music industry hailed the decision as a historic one. In 2018, Maria Fredenslund, the CEO of the Danish Rights Alliance said, “We are glad that the court recognized streaming fraud as a serious crime. This verdict is historic and emphasizes the seriousness of the issue of stream manipulation. It also shows that such fraud can be detected and that both rights holders and authorities take it seriously.”

"This sets an important precedent to prevent similar cases, especially with the advancements in artificial intelligence," she said, emphasizing the significance of the case for the future. "This is genuinely a significant and historic case," stated Anna Lidell, chair of Autor, the largest Danish group for composers, songwriters, lyricists, and producers.

Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels
Image Source: Photo by David Bartus | pexels

Anna Lidell added, "By changing and releasing the tracks, the man illegally obtained millions of listens and violated copyright." This undercuts the efforts of individuals who put in a lot of effort every day to make music but struggle to make ends meet. At first, he was charged with earning 4.38 million kroner through the streaming of 689 musical compositions on services like YouSee Musik, Apple Music, and Spotify. The court, however, declared on Thursday that they did not have sufficient information to verify the precise quantity of synthetic tunes played, the frequency of plays, or the royalties received.

Senior expert prosecutor Amir Amirian stressed the importance of the case, pointing out that it is the first of its sort in Denmark. He emphasized that the decision classified this as data fraud, highlighting its illegality as opposed to a legal loophole. He believes that other people thinking of pursuing similar methods will be discouraged by this verdict.

MORE ON MARKET REALIST
There were a total of 48,307 layoffs in February, down 55% from January.
21 hours ago
There could even be a situation in which one may have to give away half of it as income tax.
22 hours ago
The company even went as far as to make fun of McDonald's to promote their post.
22 hours ago
The contestant was dealt a rather easy hand, and she took full advantage of it.
22 hours ago
The survey found the tariffs were a 'financial challenge' for four out of 10 small businesses.
1 day ago
There are a number of reasons for this, but some are not complying with federal and state laws.
1 day ago
The X boss recently praised Grok for helping a woman get a higher refund.
1 day ago
The affected product was sold nationwide and contains undeclared wheat and soy.
1 day ago
The likes of Subway, Burger King, and Wendy's all joined in on the action.
1 day ago
While the president touted the tariffs as an economic weapon, numbers show they only hurt Americans
1 day ago
The decision was taken to prevent people from disturbing the peace of others in the plane.
2 days ago
Those who might have purchased the affected products must throw them away or ask for a refund.
2 days ago
“It can help ensure that items shifted on the shelf during busy shopping periods are accurately reflected in the inventory systems," Walmart stated.
2 days ago
The investment bank did not point its finger at AI as the reason for the mass dismissals.
2 days ago
Education, health services, and construction led hiring while other sectors saw weaker growth.
2 days ago
If it's a mansion, then it should have parking, right? Steve Harvey thinks so too.
2 days ago
Karla Lance, a school teacher, took home a huge haul from the 'Price is Right' because her husband is a wise man.
2 days ago
48% of small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) are expected to raise prices during the next six months, up from 36% the year before.
3 days ago
Economists warn that taxpayers will be burdened with $20 million per day in interest for tariff refund delays
3 days ago
He called AI the new front of wonderful stuff coming, while mentioning its possible benefits.
3 days ago