7 Nov

Must-know: Comparing Agrium with its peers

WRITTEN BY Samantha Nielson

Agrium versus its peers

In the last part of this series, we noted JANA’s argument in 2012 that Agrium’s (AGU) profitable retail division was undervalued. JANA said that the company had “consistently underperformed the weighted average of its pure play peers on a long-term basis.”

While JANA exited its position in Agrium last year, ValueAct has seen “significant strategic value” in Agrium, according to Newswire reports. ValueAct disclosed an activist stake in October.

Must-know: Comparing Agrium with its peers

A comparison of enterprise value (EV) to the earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (or EBITDA) multiple for Agrium and its peers in the fertilizer sector, shows that the Canadian fertilizer producer trades almost in line with its peers.

Its peers include companies like CF Industries (CF), PotashCorp (POT), Mosaic (MOS), Intrepid Potash (or IPI), and Monsanto.

However, its forward EV to EBITDA multiple is slightly lower than the peer average of 9.2x. The company’s dividend yield is also the second highest among its peers—after CF Industries.

While the fertilizer and agriculture sectors are currently facing challenging market conditions due to falling crop prices and lower planted acreage, a report on the Market Realist website said that hedge funds owned more than 10% of the VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO) in 2Q14.

Retail division has no direct publicly-traded peers

Although Agrium’s retail division has no direct publicly-traded peers, a 2012 analysis from Agrium’s advisor—Morgan Stanley—said the Retail unit’s forward EV to EBITDA trades at around eight times. This was comparable to its peers.

Morgan Stanley compared the retail segment to “distribution comparables” like Brenntag AG (or BNTGF), Beacon Roofing Supply Inc. (or BECN), Airgas Inc. (or ARG), MRC Global Inc. (or MRC), and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (or RS). A current evaluation of the forward EV to EBITDA multiple of its peers showed that Agrium trades almost in line with the peer average.

In 2012, analysts and JANA noted that Agrium lowered its retail valuation by changing its peer group from those outlined in an earlier 2011 investor presentation. The previous peer group included Tractor Supply (or TSCO) Co., Watsco Inc. (or WSO), W.W. Grainger Inc. (or GWW), and Genuine Parts Co. The group had a higher EV to EBITDA multiple of 11x.

Since 2012, Agrium grew its retail division through acquisitions and product portfolio expansions. It’s targeting an EBITDA of $1.3 billion in 2015.

In the next part of this series, we’ll discuss Agrium’s results for 3Q14.

Latest articles

23 May

Trade War Subdues Manufacturing PMIs around the World

WRITTEN BY Mayur Sontakke, CFA, FRM

Today, IHS Markit published its purchasing managers' indexes or PMIs for May countries around the world.

Best Buy (BBY) reported better-than-expected earnings for the first quarter of fiscal 2020, which ended on May 4.

23 May

Why Apple Stock Is Down 2.7% Today

WRITTEN BY John Parker

On May 23 at 12:46 PM EDT, Apple (AAPL) was trading at $179.12 with a 2.0% loss for the day.

The CBOE Volatility Index has been sitting at very low levels for most of 2019.

23 May

Cannabis Stocks Fell Due to Trade Fears

WRITTEN BY Adam Jones

On May 23, CannTrust (CTST) was trading nearly 4.1% lower, while Cronos Group (CRON) fell 3.3%.

US equity markets are in the red today amid the escalation in the US-China trade war.

172.31.38.64