Introducing Chicago Bridge & Iron: A Company Overview

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Part 7
Introducing Chicago Bridge & Iron: A Company Overview PART 7 OF 11

Why Chicago Bridge & Iron’s Gross Margins Fell

Cost of revenue

Chicago Bridge & Iron Company’s (CBI) cost of revenue for long-term contracts is comprised of direct contract costs such as materials and labor and indirect costs that are attributable to contract activity.

Why Chicago Bridge &#038; Iron&#8217;s Gross Margins Fell

Interested in CBI? Don't miss the next report.

Receive e-mail alerts for new research on CBI

Success! You are now receiving e-mail alerts for new research. A temporary password for your new Market Realist account has been sent to your e-mail address.

Success! has been added to your Ticker Alerts.

Success! has been added to your Ticker Alerts. Subscriptions can be managed in your user profile.

CBI’s cost of revenue came in at $9.7 billion, nearly 15.4% less than $11.4 billion in 2015, primarily due to lower revenues.

Gross profit

CBI’s gross profit margins fell to 9.6% in fiscal 2016 compared to 11.7% in fiscal 2015. The fall was due to the net impact of the increase in forecast costs of three US projects and changes in estimated recoveries on certain projects as a result of lower-than-anticipated labor, lower revenue volume for the higher margin Technology operating group, and reduced leverage of operating costs. The decline was partially offset by a higher margin mix. In absolute terms, gross profit came in at $1 billion in fiscal 2016 compared to $1.5 billion in fiscal 2015.

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization) came in at $780.8 million, and the EBITDA margin was 7.3% in 2016. That result was less than adjusted EBITDA of $1.2 billion and an EBITDA margin of 9.6% in 2015. The gross profit margin contracted.

KBR’s (KBR) adjusted EBITDA margin fell sharply from 6.8% in 2015 to 2% in 2016. Fluor’s (FLR) EBITDA margin also fell significantly, from 6.3% in 2015 to 4.3% in 2016. Jacobs Engineering (JEC) witnessed minimal EBITDA loss, from 6.2% in 2015 to 6% in 2016. It rose to 6.6% in fiscal 2017.


Please select a profession that best describes you: