<

Why potash stocks could be a winner for investors in 2014

Why potash stocks could be a winner for investors in 2014 (Part 1 of 5)

Why Uralkali’s potash contract rumor is more than just speculation

Golden days for Potash producers

Things are looking good for potash producers as of January 14 and 15, 2014. While an optimistic stock market contributed to a rise in stock prices, stocks like Potash Corp. (POT), Mosaic Co. (MOS), Agrium Inc. (AGU), and Intrepid Potash Inc. (IPI) jumped on rumors and speculation that Uralkali would be asking for higher potash prices—a move that could kick-start higher potash and share prices. The Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO) also outperformed the S&P 500 for the two-day period.

Potash Price End of 2013Enlarge Graph

Uralkali’s negotiated price

While Uralkali declined to comment on the negotiations, J.P. Morgan analysts said that Uralkali was signaling that Brazilian buyers will pay $350 to $360 a ton—including costs to transport to a named destination port—for March volumes, according to Reuters. This is up from the current $320 per ton. Uralkali could also sign a contract with China for a quoted price of $300, which could set a price floor, according to Renaissance Capital. Analysts and industry experts often view this contract with China as the benchmark for all other buyers.

Speculation of supporting prices

J.P. Morgan also noted that it has seen the first clear evidence of Uralkali’s return to the price-over-volume strategy, speculating that the company has joined Canpotex (the international potash selling arm of Canadian producers) to keep prices above $300 per tonne, equivalent to $272 per ton. If Canpotex does sell potash to China for $300 a tonne, it could suggest the bottom for potash producers.

Believing in sound fundamentals

As we write, potash prices in Saskatchewan, Canada, have fallen to a new low of $315 per metric tonne, $285.71 per ton, FOB (not including transportation costs). While some might just take this as a rumor, and we could see stocks fall once the news is out (buy the rumor, sell the news), we believe there’s real fundamental support behind the speculation. These potash companies and the Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO) are likely to do well in 2014 following two years of underperformance and negative returns.

The Realist Discussions

  • Joan

    You just keep repeating the obvious and what has already happened, without proving that Uralkali’s move is more than speculation as your title states. And it took you five pages?
    And work on the grammer. Companies “such as” ….. not “like”……. Your English is hard to read.
    Your pie charts are pasted from Uralkali’s slide presentation without giving them credit.
    I don’t think you understand this industry at all. Fertilizer companies are not allowed to “coordinate” prices between themselves. That’s called price-fixing and collusion and is illegal. The Fertilizer Institute posts a Guide to Anti-Trust Compliance for its members.
    You might want to read it.

    • D

      Astute critique Joan.
      Most journalists today repackage old information for the mass media to regergitate. Investigative journalists, like Woodward and Bernstein are rare.
      US gasoline prices are “set” to within a few pennies throughout every local. How is that not price fixing? Any idea why that is legal?

    • Xun Yao Chen

      Appreciate your comments. Keep it coming.

  • Jeremy

    why do you think the price fell 24%?? the cartel that was choking out supply set the price where they wanted it broke up. when 4 or 5 people have over 80% of the world supply they can set the price regardless of what the rules. I suspect that before the end of 2014 the cartel will be in full swing again and potash prices will be closer to $400. selling less product for more money is more profitable!