How to position yourself after of the FOMC meeting
Last week was the FOMC meeting—and the Fed decided to reduce purchases of both bonds and MBS. If you’re a REIT investor, you want to know about tapering, as MBS have been underperfoming Treasuries lately. This is probably due to bond fund outflows and hedge fund redemptions as much as anything, but repositioning ahead of the FOMC has to be playing a part as well.
The most important economic report these days came out two weeks ago—the monthly jobs report. The Street had set the bar relatively low, with a 183 thousand increase in payrolls forecast, along with a 7.2% unemployment rate. The economy ended up adding 203,000 jobs and the unemployment rate fell from 7.3% to 7.0%. Finally, the labor force participation rate ticked up, which marks one of the few times that the unemployment rate fell for the right reasons (more people working) and not for the wrong reason (lower labor force participation rate).
The post meeting press conference was interesting, especially since Ben Bernanke gave some further guidance regarding short term interest rates. He changed the language of the statement such that we can now expect to see a low fed funds rate for a period well after the unemployment rate breaches the 6.5% threshold. It was this language that got the stock market so excited.
Bernanke also claimed that fiscal policy was a headwind, which is surprising since as a percentage of GDP, government spending has averaged 24% since 2009, the highest since Harry Truman. As a percentage of GDP, The 7 highest deficits have been 2009, 2010, 2011, 1946, 2012, 1983, 2013. It seems hard to argue that fiscal policy is anything but extraordinarily loose.
The Fed wants to see a robust labor market before it makes any changes
That said, the Fed took down its forecast for 2014 unemployment. Don’t forget the Fed looks at the employment market holistically and isn’t about to pin the fate of monetary policy solely on the unemployment rate, especially if it remains stuck at levels we haven’t seen since the Carter Administration.
A low labor force participation rate means wage growth will be hard to come by. It represents a “shadow inventory” of workers who would rather be working than not working. Employers know there’s this huge reservoir of experienced workers they can tap, and employees know it too. This means very little bargaining power for workers, which will keep a lid on wage inflation. And if there’s no wage inflation, there’s no wage-price spiral, which is the driver of inflation in the first place.
REITs like Annaly (NLY), American Capital (AGNC), MFA Financial (MFA), Capstead (CMO), and Hatteras (HTS) sold off on the stronger-than-expected November jobs report. That said, the REITs are in a much better place as far as leverage than they were six months ago. Even if the Fed begins to taper in December, its stock prices are discounting this scenario, and the risk versus reward looks reasonable at these levels.
In this environment (increasing interest rates and a stronger-than-expected economy), it makes sense for income investors to focus on the non-agency REIT space—think names like Two Harbors (TWO) and Newcastle (NCT). While they have interest rate risk, they have less of it than the big agency names, and they benefit from improving credit. The agency REITs will be at risk from a Mel Watt FHFA as well, as prepayment speeds will probably increase—especially if the government extends the eligibility dates for HARP (the Home Affordable Refinance Program). That said, Mel just threw the originators a bone, by delaying Ed Demarco’s planned increases in conforming loan level pricing adjustments. On the other hand, this means higher prepayments at the margin for agency REITs
© 2013 Market Realist, Inc.
But if I knew how to manage my portfolio safer and smarter than most hedge fund managers, I could realistically grow my wealth.