Why coal prices affect fertilizer producers
While most of the world uses natural gas as an input, 80% of China’s plants use coal to produce nitrogen-based fertilizers like urea and ammonia. As one of the costlier producers of the fertilizer used to support plant growth, fluctuations in coal prices can have a significant impact on global prices. The higher the coal price, the better it is for other fertilizer producers like CF Industries Holdings Inc. (CF), Agrium Inc. (AGU), Terra Nitrogen Company LP (TNH), and Potash Corp. (POT), which don’t use coal.
Receive e-mail alerts for new research on POT:
Interested in POT?
Don’t miss the next report.
Coal has performed poorly earlier this year
The coal industry has been one of the worst performers in the global equity market this year. Companies like Peabody and Alpha Natural Resource have performed poorly in the wakes of increased supply from Australia and Indonesia and weak electricity consumption growth during the first half of the year in China. Prices of thermal coal at Newcastle fell almost 20% since the start of the year.
Coal prices have risen since summer
But since summer, prices of thermal coal have been rising. Prices for Newcastle thermal coal last traded at $80.60 per metric tonne on October 25, 2013, rising from the low of $76.30 per metric tonne on September 5. Some of the key factors that drove prices higher include improving economic growth in Europe and China, supply cuts in Australia, and higher use of thermal coal for electricity as a drought curtailed the use of hydro plants in China.
Analysts say Indonesia is also considering cutting supply in the current excess supply market. However, expected slower economic growth in China in 2014 and a shift towards cleaner fuels could limit price gains. A weaker Indian rupee could also postpone coal purchases. Look no further than coal price if investors want to know how coal demand and supply are shaping up.
Higher prices benefit fertilizer producers
So far, global economic growth is expected to pick up in 2014. This case would generally be positive for commodities like coal. While increased output has negatively impacted coal prices this year, actions taken by coal producers to cut output are encouraging. As long as these trends stay on course, coal prices should rise. Note, however, that we haven’t seen significant price gains since summer started. So it may be best to assume coal prices won’t jump by a large amount.
Higher coal prices will have a positive impact on urea prices in China and possibly on the global market, which would be revenue- and earnings-positive for manufacturers like CF Industries Holdings Inc. (CF), Terra Nitrogen Company LP (TNH), Agrium Inc. (AGU), and, to a lesser extent, Potash Corp. (POT)—holding everything else constant. This also applies to the VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO), if the market hasn’t priced in this potential move and analysts’ earnings estimates aren’t too optimistic.